Literature DB >> 31163445

Understanding Factors Associated with Uptake of BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing among Orthodox Jewish Women in the USA Using a Mixed-Methods Approach.

Meghna S Trivedi1,2, Hilary Colbeth3, Haeseung Yi4, Alejandro Vanegas5, Rebecca Starck6, Wendy K Chung7,8,9, Paul S Appelbaum10, Rita Kukafka5,11, Isaac Schechter6,12, Katherine D Crew7,8,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Ashkenazi Jews have a 1:40 prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations. Orthodox Jews are an understudied population with unique cultural and religious factors that may influence BRCA1/2 genetic testing uptake.
METHODS: Using a mixed-methods approach, we conducted a cross-sectional survey and focus groups among Orthodox Jewish women in New York/New Jersey to explore factors affecting decision-making about BRCA1/2 genetic testing.
RESULTS: Among 321 evaluable survey participants, the median age was 47 years (range, 25-82); 56% were Modern Orthodox and 44% Yeshivish/Chassidish/other; 84% were married; 7% had a personal history of breast or ovarian cancer. Nearly 20% of the women had undergone BRCA1/2genetic testing. Predictors of genetic testing uptake included being Modern Orthodox (odds ratio [OR] = 2.31), married (OR = 3.49), and having a personal or family history of breast or ovarian cancer (OR = 9.74). Focus group participants (n = 31) confirmed the importance of rabbinic consultation in medical decision-making and revealed that stigma was a prominent factor in decisions about BRCA1/2 testing due to its potential impact on marriageability.
CONCLUSION: In order to increase the uptake of BRCA1/2 genetic testing among the Orthodox Jewish population, it is crucial to understand religious and cultural factors, such as stigma and effect on marriageability, and engage religious leaders in raising awareness within the community.
© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1; BRCA2; Genetic testing; Orthodox Jewish women

Year:  2019        PMID: 31163445      PMCID: PMC6687531          DOI: 10.1159/000499852

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  34 in total

1.  Tamoxifen and breast cancer incidence among women with inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP-P1) Breast Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  M C King; S Wieand; K Hale; M Lee; T Walsh; K Owens; J Tait; L Ford; B K Dunn; J Costantino; L Wickerham; N Wolmark; B Fisher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Perceptions of Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer patients on genetic testing for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  K A Phillips; E Warner; W S Meschino; J Hunter; M Abdolell; G Glendon; I L Andrulis; P J Goodwin
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Ellyn Micco; Amy Carney; Jill Stopfer; Mary Putt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-04-13       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Racial/ethnic group differences in treatment decision-making and treatment received among older breast carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Rose C Maly; Yoshiko Umezawa; Carl T Ratliff; Barbara Leake
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  A randomized controlled trial of a decision aid for women considering genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer risk.

Authors:  Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser; Judi Homewood; Michelle Peate; Alan Taylor; Elizabeth Lobb; Judy Kirk; Mary-Anne Young; Rachel Williams; Tracy Dudding; Kathy Tucker
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Carrier matching and collective socialization in community genetics: Dor Yeshorim and the reinforcement of stigma.

Authors:  Aviad E Raz; Yafa Vizner
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael J Green; Susan K Peterson; Maria Wagner Baker; Gregory R Harper; Lois C Friedman; Wendy S Rubinstein; David T Mauger
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Cancer genetics knowledge and beliefs and receipt of results in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals receiving counseling for BRCA1/2 mutations.

Authors:  Kimberly Kelly; Howard Leventhal; Monica Marvin; Deborah Toppmeyer; Jill Baran; Marvin Schwalb
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.302

Review 9.  Ethical issues related to BRCA gene testing in orthodox Jewish women.

Authors:  Pnina Mor; Kathleen Oberle
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.874

10.  A population-based study of Ashkenazi Jewish women's attitudes toward genetic discrimination and BRCA1/2 testing.

Authors:  Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Jane C Weeks; Neil Klar; Judy E Garber
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  1 in total

1.  Residential Locale Is Associated with Disparities in Genetic Testing-Related Outcomes Among BRCA1/2-Positive Women.

Authors:  Kate E Dibble; Avonne E Connor
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2022-02-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.