Literature DB >> 12394347

A population-based study of Ashkenazi Jewish women's attitudes toward genetic discrimination and BRCA1/2 testing.

Lisa Soleymani Lehmann1, Jane C Weeks, Neil Klar, Judy E Garber.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Human Genome Project continues to produce an increasing number of genetic susceptibility tests. Some of these genetic tests target social or ethnic groups who are at increased risk of developing a disease. The Ashkenazi Jewish community is one ethnic group that is an ongoing subject of genetic investigation. We assessed the attitudes of a population-based sample of Ashkenazi Jewish women toward breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility testing (BRCA 1/2). In particular, we assessed concerns about group discrimination, perceptions of the advantages and disadvantages of testing, and the relationship between concerns about discrimination and the potential benefits of genetic testing.
METHODS: A telephone survey of a population-based sample of 200 Jewish women.
RESULTS: A minority of women (17%) in this study expressed concern or discomfort with Jews being offered testing. Most women believed there were scientific reasons for testing Jews (71%), and only 5% of women felt that research that focused on Jews was bad for Jews as a group. Increased concern about genetic discrimination was associated with women who were highly educated (odds ratio 2.68). Forty percent of women surveyed were interested in testing, 40% were not interested, and 20% were uncertain about whether they would obtain testing. Increased interest in genetic testing was associated with a desire to obtain information about children's risk of disease and valuing information for its own sake.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of a population-based sample of Jewish women did not express concerns about group discrimination resulting from genetic testing. Women who are highly educated are more concerned about genetic discrimination. There is significant variation among Jewish women's interest in breast cancer susceptibility testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12394347     DOI: 10.1097/00125817-200209000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  14 in total

Review 1.  Global trends on fears and concerns of genetic discrimination: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annet Wauters; Ine Van Hoyweghen
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 3.172

2.  Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice Regarding Genetic Testing and Genetic Counselors in Jordan: A Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Mamoun Ahram; Majd Soubani; Lana Abu Salem; Haneen Saker; Muayyad Ahmad
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Ashkenazi Jews and breast cancer: the consequences of linking ethnic identity to genetic disease.

Authors:  Sherry I Brandt-Rauf; Victoria H Raveis; Nathan F Drummond; Jill A Conte; Sheila M Rothman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  The influence of health care policies and health care system distrust on willingness to undergo genetic testing.

Authors:  Katrina Armstrong; Mary Putt; Chanita Hughes Halbert; David Grande; Jerome Sanford Schwartz; Kaijun Liao; Noora Marcus; Mirar Bristol Demeter; Judy Shea
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Community attitudes towards a Jewish community BRCA1/2 testing program.

Authors:  Nicole Cousens; Rajneesh Kaur; Bettina Meiser; Lesley Andrews
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Understanding Factors Associated with Uptake of BRCA1/2 Genetic Testing among Orthodox Jewish Women in the USA Using a Mixed-Methods Approach.

Authors:  Meghna S Trivedi; Hilary Colbeth; Haeseung Yi; Alejandro Vanegas; Rebecca Starck; Wendy K Chung; Paul S Appelbaum; Rita Kukafka; Isaac Schechter; Katherine D Crew
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 2.000

7.  Factors influencing uptake of genetic testing for colorectal cancer risk in an Australian Jewish population.

Authors:  B J Warner; L J Curnow; A L Polglase; H S Debinski
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Patient perspectives on group benefits and harms in genetic research.

Authors:  A J Goldenberg; S C Hull; B S Wilfond; R R Sharp
Journal:  Public Health Genomics       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 2.000

Review 9.  Hereditary breast cancer in Jews.

Authors:  Wendy S Rubinstein
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Impact of Genetic Counseling and Testing on Altruistic Motivations to Test for BRCA1/2: a Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Rahul Garg; Joseph Vogelgesang; Kimberly Kelly
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.