Literature DB >> 33015847

Collecting e-cigarette aerosols for in vitro applications: A survey of the biomedical literature and opportunities to increase the value of submerged cell culture-based assessments.

Daniel J Smart1, Gary Phillips2.   

Abstract

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) are being developed as potentially reduced-risk alternatives to the continued use of combustible tobacco products. Because of the widespread uptake of ENDS-in particular, e-cigarettes-the biological effects, including the toxic potential, of their aerosols are under investigation. Preclinically, collection of such aerosols is a prerequisite for testing in submerged cell culture-based in vitro assays; however, despite the growth in this research area, there is no apparent standardized collection method for this application. To this end, through an Institute for in vitro Sciences, Inc. workshop initiative, we surveyed the biomedical literature catalogued in PubMed® to map the types of methods hitherto used and reported publicly. From the 47 relevant publications retrieved, we identified seven distinct collection methods. Bubble-through (with aqueous solvents) and Cambridge filter pad (CFP) (with polar solvents) collection were the most frequently cited methods (57% and 18%, respectively), while the five others (CFP + bubble-through; condensation; cotton filters; settle-upon; settle-upon + dry) were cited less often (2-10%). Critically, the collected aerosol fractions were generally found to be only minimally characterized chemically, if at all. Furthermore, there was large heterogeneity among other experimental parameters (e.g., vaping regimen). Consequently, we recommend that more comprehensive research be conducted to identify the method(s) that produce the fraction(s) most representative of the native aerosol. We also endorse standardization of the aerosol generation process. These should be regarded as opportunities for increasing the value of in vitro assessments in relation to predicting effects on human health.
© 2020 The Authors. Journal of Applied Toxicology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aerosol collection; e-cigarette; in vitro assays; literature survey; submerged cell cultures

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33015847      PMCID: PMC7756347          DOI: 10.1002/jat.4064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  76 in total

1.  Distribution, quantification and toxicity of cinnamaldehyde in electronic cigarette refill fluids and aerosols.

Authors:  Rachel Z Behar; Wentai Luo; Sabrina C Lin; Yuhuan Wang; Jackelyn Valle; James F Pankow; Prue Talbot
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 7.552

Review 2.  Safety evaluation and risk assessment of electronic cigarettes as tobacco cigarette substitutes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Konstantinos E Farsalinos; Riccardo Polosa
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2014-04

3.  Airway Exposure to E-Cigarette Vapors Impairs Autophagy and Induces Aggresome Formation.

Authors:  Prashanth Chandramani Shivalingappa; Rachel Hole; Colin Van Westphal; Neeraj Vij
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 8.401

4.  An inter-laboratory in vitro assessment of cigarettes and next generation nicotine delivery products.

Authors:  Shigeaki Ito; Mark Taylor; Sakura Mori; David Thorne; Tomoki Nishino; Damien Breheny; Marianna Gaça; Kei Yoshino; Christopher Proctor
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.372

5.  Tobacco and e-cigarette products initiate Kupffer cell inflammatory responses.

Authors:  David A Rubenstein; Sarah Hom; Berhane Ghebrehiwet; Wei Yin
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 4.407

Review 6.  Electronic cigarettes: product characterisation and design considerations.

Authors:  Christopher J Brown; James M Cheng
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Characterization of Electronic Cigarette Aerosol and Its Induction of Oxidative Stress Response in Oral Keratinocytes.

Authors:  Eoon Hye Ji; Bingbing Sun; Tongke Zhao; Shi Shu; Chong Hyun Chang; Diana Messadi; Tian Xia; Yifang Zhu; Shen Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Lung Toxicity of Condensed Aerosol from E-CIG Liquids: Influence of the Flavor and the In Vitro Model Used.

Authors:  Rossella Bengalli; Emanuele Ferri; Massimo Labra; Paride Mantecca
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-20       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  Electronic Cigarette Smoke Impairs Normal Mesenchymal Stem Cell Differentiation.

Authors:  A Shaito; J Saliba; A Husari; M El-Harakeh; H Chhouri; Y Hashem; A Shihadeh; M El-Sabban
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 10.  Collecting e-cigarette aerosols for in vitro applications: A survey of the biomedical literature and opportunities to increase the value of submerged cell culture-based assessments.

Authors:  Daniel J Smart; Gary Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.446

View more
  7 in total

1.  The in vitro ToxTracker and Aneugen Clastogen Evaluation extension assay as a tool in the assessment of relative genotoxic potential of e-liquids and their aerosols.

Authors:  Lukasz Czekala; Fiona Chapman; Liam Simms; Kathryn Rudd; Edgar Trelles Sticken; Roman Wieczorek; Lisa Maria Bode; Jutta Pani; Nynke Moelijker; Remco Derr; Inger Brandsma; Giel Hendriks; Matthew Stevenson; Tanvir Walele
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Use of a rapid human primary cell-based disease screening model, to compare next generation products to combustible cigarettes.

Authors:  Liam Simms; Elizabeth Mason; Ellen L Berg; Fan Yu; Kathryn Rudd; Lukasz Czekala; Edgar Trelles Sticken; Oleg Brinster; Roman Wieczorek; Matthew Stevenson; Tanvir Walele
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2021-08-17

3.  Use of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes to Predict the Cardiotoxicity Potential of Next Generation Nicotine Products.

Authors:  Liam Simms; Fan Yu; Jessica Palmer; Kathryn Rudd; Edgar Trelles Sticken; Roman Wieczorek; Fiona Chapman; Lukasz Czekala; Matthew Stevenson; Grant O'Connell
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-16

4.  New Insights into How JUUL™ Electronic Cigarette Aerosols and Aerosol Constituents Affect SARS-CoV-2 Infection of Human Bronchial Epithelial Cells.

Authors:  Rattapol Phandthong; Man Wong; Ann Song; Teresa Martinez; Prue Talbot
Journal:  bioRxiv       Date:  2022-08-24

5.  Use of new approach methodologies (NAMs) to meet regulatory requirements for the assessment of tobacco and other nicotine-containing products.

Authors:  Jacqueline Miller-Holt; Holger P Behrsing; Amy J Clippinger; Carole Hirn; Todd J Stedeford; Andreas O Stucki
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-09-09

6.  Fabrication and Validation of an Economical, Programmable, Dual-Channel, Electronic Cigarette Aerosol Generator.

Authors:  Dominic L Palazzolo; Jordan Caudill; James Baron; Kevin Cooper
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Collecting e-cigarette aerosols for in vitro applications: A survey of the biomedical literature and opportunities to increase the value of submerged cell culture-based assessments.

Authors:  Daniel J Smart; Gary Phillips
Journal:  J Appl Toxicol       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 3.446

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.