| Literature DB >> 31160820 |
Laure Frésard1, Craig Smail2, Nicole M Ferraro2, Nicole A Teran3, Xin Li4, Kevin S Smith4, Devon Bonner5, Kristin D Kernohan6, Shruti Marwaha5,7, Zachary Zappala3, Brunilda Balliu4, Joe R Davis3, Boxiang Liu8, Cameron J Prybol3, Jennefer N Kohler5, Diane B Zastrow5, Chloe M Reuter5, Dianna G Fisk9, Megan E Grove9, Jean M Davidson5, Taila Hartley10, Ruchi Joshi9, Benjamin J Strober11, Sowmithri Utiramerur9, Lars Lind12, Erik Ingelsson7,13, Alexis Battle11,14, Gill Bejerano15,16,17,18, Jonathan A Bernstein16, Euan A Ashley3,5,13, Kym M Boycott10, Jason D Merker4,9,19, Matthew T Wheeler5,7, Stephen B Montgomery20,21.
Abstract
It is estimated that 350 million individuals worldwide suffer from rare diseases, which are predominantly caused by mutation in a single gene1. The current molecular diagnostic rate is estimated at 50%, with whole-exome sequencing (WES) among the most successful approaches2-5. For patients in whom WES is uninformative, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has shown diagnostic utility in specific tissues and diseases6-8. This includes muscle biopsies from patients with undiagnosed rare muscle disorders6,9, and cultured fibroblasts from patients with mitochondrial disorders7. However, for many individuals, biopsies are not performed for clinical care, and tissues are difficult to access. We sought to assess the utility of RNA-seq from blood as a diagnostic tool for rare diseases of different pathophysiologies. We generated whole-blood RNA-seq from 94 individuals with undiagnosed rare diseases spanning 16 diverse disease categories. We developed a robust approach to compare data from these individuals with large sets of RNA-seq data for controls (n = 1,594 unrelated controls and n = 49 family members) and demonstrated the impacts of expression, splicing, gene and variant filtering strategies on disease gene identification. Across our cohort, we observed that RNA-seq yields a 7.5% diagnostic rate, and an additional 16.7% with improved candidate gene resolution.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31160820 PMCID: PMC6634302 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0457-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Med ISSN: 1078-8956 Impact factor: 53.440