Literature DB >> 31160820

Identification of rare-disease genes using blood transcriptome sequencing and large control cohorts.

Laure Frésard1, Craig Smail2, Nicole M Ferraro2, Nicole A Teran3, Xin Li4, Kevin S Smith4, Devon Bonner5, Kristin D Kernohan6, Shruti Marwaha5,7, Zachary Zappala3, Brunilda Balliu4, Joe R Davis3, Boxiang Liu8, Cameron J Prybol3, Jennefer N Kohler5, Diane B Zastrow5, Chloe M Reuter5, Dianna G Fisk9, Megan E Grove9, Jean M Davidson5, Taila Hartley10, Ruchi Joshi9, Benjamin J Strober11, Sowmithri Utiramerur9, Lars Lind12, Erik Ingelsson7,13, Alexis Battle11,14, Gill Bejerano15,16,17,18, Jonathan A Bernstein16, Euan A Ashley3,5,13, Kym M Boycott10, Jason D Merker4,9,19, Matthew T Wheeler5,7, Stephen B Montgomery20,21.   

Abstract

It is estimated that 350 million individuals worldwide suffer from rare diseases, which are predominantly caused by mutation in a single gene1. The current molecular diagnostic rate is estimated at 50%, with whole-exome sequencing (WES) among the most successful approaches2-5. For patients in whom WES is uninformative, RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) has shown diagnostic utility in specific tissues and diseases6-8. This includes muscle biopsies from patients with undiagnosed rare muscle disorders6,9, and cultured fibroblasts from patients with mitochondrial disorders7. However, for many individuals, biopsies are not performed for clinical care, and tissues are difficult to access. We sought to assess the utility of RNA-seq from blood as a diagnostic tool for rare diseases of different pathophysiologies. We generated whole-blood RNA-seq from 94 individuals with undiagnosed rare diseases spanning 16 diverse disease categories. We developed a robust approach to compare data from these individuals with large sets of RNA-seq data for controls (n = 1,594 unrelated controls and n = 49 family members) and demonstrated the impacts of expression, splicing, gene and variant filtering strategies on disease gene identification. Across our cohort, we observed that RNA-seq yields a 7.5% diagnostic rate, and an additional 16.7% with improved candidate gene resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31160820      PMCID: PMC6634302          DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0457-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


  70 in total

Review 1.  The frontiers of sequencing in undiagnosed neurodevelopmental diseases.

Authors:  Hane Lee; Stanley F Nelson
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 5.578

2.  Transcriptome-directed analysis for Mendelian disease diagnosis overcomes limitations of conventional genomic testing.

Authors:  David R Murdock; Hongzheng Dai; Lindsay C Burrage; Jill A Rosenfeld; Shamika Ketkar; Michaela F Müller; Vicente A Yépez; Julien Gagneur; Pengfei Liu; Shan Chen; Mahim Jain; Gladys Zapata; Carlos A Bacino; Hsiao-Tuan Chao; Paolo Moretti; William J Craigen; Neil A Hanchard; Brendan Lee
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Genetic regulatory variation in populations informs transcriptome analysis in rare disease.

Authors:  Pejman Mohammadi; Stephane E Castel; Beryl B Cummings; Jonah Einson; Christina Sousa; Paul Hoffman; Sandra Donkervoort; Zhuoxun Jiang; Payam Mohassel; A Reghan Foley; Heather E Wheeler; Hae Kyung Im; Carsten G Bonnemann; Daniel G MacArthur; Tuuli Lappalainen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Using Drosophila to drive the diagnosis and understand the mechanisms of rare human diseases.

Authors:  Nichole Link; Hugo J Bellen
Journal:  Development       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 5.  [Application of RNA sequencing in clinical diagnosis of Mendelian disease].

Authors:  Hui Xiao; Wen-Hao Zhou
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-10

Review 6.  Rare genetic causes of complex kidney and urological diseases.

Authors:  Emily E Groopman; Gundula Povysil; David B Goldstein; Ali G Gharavi
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 28.314

7.  The Role of Host Genetic Factors in Coronavirus Susceptibility: Review of Animal and Systematic Review of Human Literature.

Authors:  Marissa LoPresti; David B Beck; Priya Duggal; Derek A T Cummings; Benjamin D Solomon
Journal:  medRxiv       Date:  2020-06-03

8.  A rare genomic duplication in 2p14 underlies autosomal dominant hearing loss DFNA58.

Authors:  Karina Lezirovitz; Gleiciele A Vieira-Silva; Ana C Batissoco; Débora Levy; Joao P Kitajima; Alix Trouillet; Ellen Ouyang; Navid Zebarjadi; Juliana Sampaio-Silva; Vinicius Pedroso-Campos; Larissa R Nascimento; Cindy Y Sonoda; Vinícius M Borges; Laura G Vasconcelos; Roberto M O Beck; Signe S Grasel; Daniel J Jagger; Nicolas Grillet; Ricardo F Bento; Regina C Mingroni-Netto; Jeanne Oiticica
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Multiomic analysis elucidates Complex I deficiency caused by a deep intronic variant in NDUFB10.

Authors:  Guy Helman; Alison G Compton; Daniella H Hock; Marzena Walkiewicz; Gemma R Brett; Lynn Pais; Tiong Y Tan; Ricardo De Paoli-Iseppi; Michael B Clark; John Christodoulou; Susan M White; David R Thorburn; David A Stroud; Zornitza Stark; Cas Simons
Journal:  Hum Mutat       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.878

10.  Nonsense-mediated decay is highly stable across individuals and tissues.

Authors:  Nicole A Teran; Daniel C Nachun; Tiffany Eulalio; Nicole M Ferraro; Craig Smail; Manuel A Rivas; Stephen B Montgomery
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.