| Literature DB >> 31159865 |
Maria Luisa Aznar1,2, Theodore K Marras3, Ahmed Said Elshal3,4, Mahtab Mehrabi3, Sarah K Brode3,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treatment guidelines suggest either a low-dose or high-dose approach when prescribing amikacin for nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease (NTM PD), but data supporting the low-dose approach are limited. The purpose of this study was to describe the safety and efficacy of the use of a low-dose of intravenous amikacin in a cohort of patients with NTM PD.Entities:
Keywords: Amikacin; NTM lung disease; Nontuberculous mycobacteria
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31159865 PMCID: PMC6547538 DOI: 10.1186/s40360-019-0302-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pharmacol Toxicol ISSN: 2050-6511 Impact factor: 2.483
Baseline characteristics of patients treated with amikacin
| Baseline characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Sex, Female | 70 (65.4) |
| Age (Years), Mean (SD) | 58.3 (14.9) |
| Race | |
| Caucasian | 72 (67.3) |
| South Asian | 4 (3.7) |
| East Asian | 28 (26.2) |
| African | 3 (2.8) |
| Comorbidities | |
| COPD/Emphysema | 19 (17.7) |
| Previous TB | 13 (12.1) |
| Cystic fibrosis | 6 (5.6) |
| Asthma | 5 (4.7) |
| Autoimmune disorders | 5 (4.7) |
| Alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency | 2 (1.9) |
| Sarcoidosis | 2 (1.9) |
| ABPA | 2 (1.9) |
| Allogenic stem cell transplant | 2 (1.9) |
| HIV infection | 1 (0.9) |
| Species | |
| MACa | 69 (64.5) |
| | 21 (19.6) |
| | 11 (10.3) |
| MAC and | 4 (3.7) |
| | 1 (0.9) |
| | 1 (0.9) |
| AFB smear positive ever | 100 (93.5) |
| Aspergillus isolation | 39 (36.4) |
| CT pattern | |
| Nodular bronchiectatic | 55 (51.4) |
| Fibrocavitary | 40 (37.4) |
| Random nodules | 2 (1.9) |
| Consolidation | 0 (0) |
| Unclassifiable | 10 (9.3) |
| Cavity | 66 (61.7) |
| Indication for treatment | |
| First line | 39 (36.4) |
| Second line | 68 (63.6) |
SD Standard deviation, COPD Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, TB Tuberculosis, SLE Systemic Lupus Erythematous, ABPA Allergic Bronchopulmonary Aspergillosis, HIV Human Immunodeficiency Virus, MAC Mycobacterium avium complex, AFB Acid Fast Bacilli, CT Computed Tomography
aFive patients had Clarithromycin resistant MAC; MAC isolates were not identified to the species level prior to 2010, and so are reported as MAC herein
Adverse effects associated with amikacin
| Adverse effects | N (%) |
|---|---|
| Ototoxicity | |
| Subjective symptoms | 43/107 (40.2%) |
| Hearing impairment seen in audiograms | 30/77 (39.0%) |
| Nephrotoxicity | 6/96 (6.2%) |
| Vestibular toxicity | 4/107 (3.7%) |
| PICC related complications | |
| Venous thromboembolism | 7/107 (6.5%) |
| Bloodstream infection | 1/107 (0.9%) |
| Fatigue | 6/107 (5.6%) |
| Skin rash | 5/107 (4.7%) |
| Paresthesias | 1/107 (0.9%) |
| Restless extremities | 1/107 (0.9%) |
PICC Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter
Comparison of demographic and clinical characteristics in patients with and without audiographically demonstrated ototoxicity
| Ototoxicity | No ototoxicity | Univariate model | Multivariate modela | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |||
| Sex, female | 24 (80%) | 29 (61.7%) | 2.48 (0.85–7.24) | 0.096 | 4.96 (1.24–19.87) | 0.024 |
| Age (years), median (IQR) | 61 (43–65) | 65 (51–72) | 0.98 (0.95–1.01) | 0.247 | 0.98 (0.94–1.02) | 0.297 |
| Race | ||||||
| Caucasian | 22 (73.3%) | 29 (61.7%) | 1.71 (0.63–4.64) | 0.295 | ||
| South Asian | 1 (3.3%) | 1 (2.1%) | 1.59 (0.09–26.36) | 0.748 | ||
| East Asian | 6 (20%) | 16 (34%) | 0.48 (0.16–1.42) | 0.188 | 0.24 (0.06–0.95) | 0.042 |
| African | 1 (3.3%) | 1 (2.1) | 1.59 (0.09–26.36) | 0.748 | ||
| Weekly dose AK per bodyweight (mg/kg/week), median (IQR)b | 29 (23.7–41.3) | 25.2 (21.8–29.4) | 1.05 (1.00–1.10) | 0.047 | 1.03 (0.98–1.09) | 0.248 |
| Months on AK, median (IQR) | 11.5 (7–18.25) | 7 (4–10) | 1.04 (1.00–1.08) | 0.052 | ||
| Total dose AK per bodyweight (g/kg), Median (IQR)c | 1.81 (0.85–3.13) | 0.74 (0.51–1.27) | 1.59 (1.08–2.33) | 0.018 | 1.62 (1.08–2.43) | 0.020 |
| Total dose AK (g), Median (IQR)d | 77.3 (52.9–196.3) | 41.7 (25.6–67.5) | 1.01 (1.00–1.02) | 0.011 | ||
| Repeated exposure to amikacin | 9 (30%) | 10 (21.3%) | 1.59 (0.56–1.52) | 0.388 | ||
| Baseline weight (kg), Median (IQR) | 51.5 (41–66.5) | 55 (48–64) | 0.99 (0.96–1.03) | 0.712 | ||
| Initial serum creatinine (umol/L), mean (SD) | 66.0 (56.7–74.0) | 63 (53–75) | 1.01 (0.97–1.04) | 0.656 | ||
| Baseline disabling hearing impairment | 8 (26.7%) | 24 (51.1%) | 0.35 (0.13–0.94) | 0.037 | 0.54 (0.17–1.74) | 0.305 |
| Current treatment with macrolides | 29 (96.7%) | 45 (95.7%) | 1.23 (0.11–14.87) | 0.839 | ||
| Nephrotoxicity | 1 (3.6%) | 4 (8.5%) | 0.38 (0.04–3.58) | 0.398 | ||
IQR Interquartile Range, AK Amikacin
aVariables with a p-value < 0.2 in the univariate analysis, and variables considered a priori to be clinically important, were included in the multivariate model, wherein multicollinearity was explored using variance inflation factor (VIF). Months on amikacin and total dose amikacin per bodyweight both had VIFs> 10, and so were eliminated
bOR represents risk associated with each increase of 1 mg/kg/week
cOR represents risk associated with each increase of 1 g/kg total dose
dOR represents risk associated with each increase of 1 g total dose
Total dose of amikacin and months on amikacin were excluded from the multivariate analysis due to collinearity
Patient characteristics and their association with sputum culture conversion
| Sputum culture conversion | No sputum culture conversion | Univariate model | Multivariate model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95%CI) | P value | OR (95%CI) | P value | |||
| Sex, female | 23 (74.2%) | 23 (62.2%) | 1.75 (0.62–4.97) | 0.293 | ||
| Age (years), median (IQR) | 58 (50–67) | 61 (44–47.5) | 1.00 (0.97–1.03) | 0.953 | ||
| Species/complex | ||||||
| MAC | 17 (54.8%) | 20 (54.1%) | 1.02 (0.38–2.73) | 0.969 | ||
| | 3 (9.7%) | 10 (27%) | 0.28 (0.76–22.23) | 0.073 | 0.87 (0.18–4.28) | 0.868 |
| | 6 (19.4%) | 2 (5.4%) | 4.12 (0.76–22.23) | 0.099 | 9.50 (0.68–131.82) | 0.094 |
| MAC/ | 1 (3.2%) | 2 (5.4%) | ||||
| Macrolide resistant MAC | 2 (6.5%) | 3 (8.1%) | 0.76 (0.12–4.89) | 0.774 | ||
| | 1 (3.2%) | 0 | ||||
| | 1 (3.2%) | 0 | ||||
| FC pattern | 13 (35.1%) | 13 (41.9%) | 1.33 (0.50–3.56) | 0.566 | ||
| Cavity | 21 (67.7%) | 23 (62.2%) | 1.28 (0.47–3.49) | 0.632 | ||
| AFB positive ever | 30 (96.8%) | 37 (100%) | 3.69 (0.15–93.81) | 0.791 | ||
| Total dose AK per bodyweight (g/kg), median (IQR)b | 0.79 (0.55–2.29) | 1.20 (0.74–2.09) | 0.81 (0.55–1.18) | 0.268 | 0.54 (0.26–1.10) | 0.089 |
| Weekly dose AK per bodyweight (mg/kg/week), median (IQR)a | 26.09 (23.61–33.87) | 27.03 (22.6–40.3) | 0.98 (0.94–1.03) | 0.438 | ||
| Months on AK, median (IQR) | 8 (4–18) | 8 (6–15) | 0.98 (0.94–1.02) | 0.356 | ||
| Total dose AK (g), Median (IQR)c | 46.8 (29.4–130.3) | 60.3 (37.8–118.0) | 1.00 (0.99–1.01) | 0.725 | ||
| Surgery | 19 (61.3%) | 2 (5.4%) | 27.7 (5.61–136.9) | < 0.001 | 33.01 (4.79–227.27) | < 0.001 |
FC Fibrocavitary pattern, IQR Interquartile Range, MAC Mycobacterium avium Complex, AK Amikacin
aOR represents risk associated with each increase of 1 mg/kg/week
bOR represents risk associated with each increase of 1 g/kg total dose
cOR represents risk associated with each increase of 1 g total dose