Maria C Carrillo1, Demetris Patsios2, Ute Wagnetz2, Frances Jamieson3, Theodore K Marras4. 1. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: maclacarrillo@gmail.com. 2. Joint Department of Medical Imaging, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
AIM: Mycobacterium xenopi is described with upper lobe cavitation ("fibrocavitary" pattern), whereas the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is described with bronchiectasis and centrilobular nodules ("nodular bronchiectasis"). We retrospectively described and compared computed tomography (CT) chest manifestations of disease caused by MAC and M xenopi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed patients who had either MAC or M xenopi lung disease and who had CTs between January 2002 and December 2003. Clinical data were recorded, and the patterns on chest CTs were categorized as "fibrocavitary," "nodular bronchiectatic," and "unclassified." RESULTS: There were 74 patients; 50 with MAC and 24 with M xenopi. The patients with MAC were older (mean 69 vs 58 years; P = .007). Patients with M xenopi more often had emphysema (50% vs 20%; P = .02), cavities (46% vs 16%; P = .01), and nodules ≤5 mm (88% vs 58%; P = .02). M xenopi cases more commonly had a fibrocavitary radiologic pattern (33% vs 18%), with no statistically significant difference (P = .24). MAC was more often associated with a nodular bronchiectatic pattern (68% MAC vs 4% M xenopi; P < .0001). Sixty-three percent of patients with M xenopi had a pattern that was predominantly randomly distributed nodules (11/15 [73%]) or consolidation and/or ground-glass opacities (4/15 [27%]). CONCLUSION: Compared with MAC, patients with M xenopi infection develop more cavities and more nodules, and they less often have a predominant nodular bronchiectatic pattern. Although a predominantly cavitary pattern appears to be more common with M xenopi, the majority of patients with M xenopi had CT patterns of random nodules or consolidation and/or ground-glass opacities rather than classically described findings.
AIM: Mycobacterium xenopi is described with upper lobe cavitation ("fibrocavitary" pattern), whereas the Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) is described with bronchiectasis and centrilobular nodules ("nodular bronchiectasis"). We retrospectively described and compared computed tomography (CT) chest manifestations of disease caused by MAC and M xenopi. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed patients who had either MAC or M xenopi lung disease and who had CTs between January 2002 and December 2003. Clinical data were recorded, and the patterns on chest CTs were categorized as "fibrocavitary," "nodular bronchiectatic," and "unclassified." RESULTS: There were 74 patients; 50 with MAC and 24 with M xenopi. The patients with MAC were older (mean 69 vs 58 years; P = .007). Patients with M xenopi more often had emphysema (50% vs 20%; P = .02), cavities (46% vs 16%; P = .01), and nodules ≤5 mm (88% vs 58%; P = .02). M xenopi cases more commonly had a fibrocavitary radiologic pattern (33% vs 18%), with no statistically significant difference (P = .24). MAC was more often associated with a nodular bronchiectatic pattern (68% MAC vs 4% M xenopi; P < .0001). Sixty-three percent of patients with M xenopi had a pattern that was predominantly randomly distributed nodules (11/15 [73%]) or consolidation and/or ground-glass opacities (4/15 [27%]). CONCLUSION: Compared with MAC, patients with M xenopi infection develop more cavities and more nodules, and they less often have a predominant nodular bronchiectatic pattern. Although a predominantly cavitary pattern appears to be more common with M xenopi, the majority of patients with M xenopi had CT patterns of random nodules or consolidation and/or ground-glass opacities rather than classically described findings.
Authors: M Fleshner; K N Olivier; P A Shaw; J Adjemian; S Strollo; R J Claypool; L Folio; A Zelazny; S M Holland; D R Prevots Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2016-05 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Takashi Hirama; Alex Marchand-Austin; Jennifer Ma; David C Alexander; Sarah K Brode; Theodore K Marras; Frances B Jamieson Journal: Lung Date: 2018-01-18 Impact factor: 2.584
Authors: Charles L Daley; Jonathan M Iaccarino; Christoph Lange; Emmanuelle Cambau; Richard J Wallace; Claire Andrejak; Erik C Böttger; Jan Brozek; David E Griffith; Lorenzo Guglielmetti; Gwen A Huitt; Shandra L Knight; Philip Leitman; Theodore K Marras; Kenneth N Olivier; Miguel Santin; Jason E Stout; Enrico Tortoli; Jakko van Ingen; Dirk Wagner; Kevin L Winthrop Journal: Eur Respir J Date: 2020-07-07 Impact factor: 16.671
Authors: Charles L Daley; Jonathan M Iaccarino; Christoph Lange; Emmanuelle Cambau; Richard J Wallace; Claire Andrejak; Erik C Böttger; Jan Brozek; David E Griffith; Lorenzo Guglielmetti; Gwen A Huitt; Shandra L Knight; Philip Leitman; Theodore K Marras; Kenneth N Olivier; Miguel Santin; Jason E Stout; Enrico Tortoli; Jakko van Ingen; Dirk Wagner; Kevin L Winthrop Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Theodore K Marras; Michael A Campitelli; Hong Lu; Hannah Chung; Sarah K Brode; Alex Marchand-Austin; Kevin L Winthrop; Andrea S Gershon; Jeffrey C Kwong; Frances B Jamieson Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2017-03 Impact factor: 6.883