| Literature DB >> 27506679 |
Ho Namkoong1,2,3, Kozo Morimoto4, Tomoyasu Nishimura5, Hiromu Tanaka1, Hiroaki Sugiura6, Yoshitake Yamada6, Atsuko Kurosaki7, Takanori Asakura1, Shoji Suzuki1, Hiroshi Fujiwara8, Kazuma Yagi1, Makoto Ishii1, Sadatomo Tasaka1, Tomoko Betsuyaku1, Yoshihiko Hoshino9, Atsuyuki Kurashima4, Naoki Hasegawa10.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium abscessus (M. abscessus) pulmonary disease is a refractory chronic infectious disease. Options for treating M. abscessus pulmonary disease are limited, especially in outpatient settings. Among parenteral antibiotics against M. abscessus, intravenous amikacin (AMK) is expected to be an effective outpatient antimicrobial therapy. This study evaluated the clinical efficacy and safety of intravenous AMK therapy in outpatients with M. abscessus pulmonary disease.Entities:
Keywords: Amikacin; Intravenous therapy; Mycobacterium abscessus; Outpatient treatment; Rapid-growing mycobacterium
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27506679 PMCID: PMC4977760 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1689-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Flow diagram of patient enrollment
Patient background data
| Backgrounds | ( |
|---|---|
| Age, mean ± SD (range), years | 63.7 ± 8.5 (50–86) |
| Male/Female, no | 2/11 |
| Weight, mean ± SD (range), kg | 44.7 ± 6.1 (35–56) |
| Smoking history, no (%) | 2 (15.4) |
| Medical history, no (%) | |
|
| 5 (38.5) |
| Pulmonary aspergillosis | 2 (15.4) |
| Hypertension | 2 (15.4) |
| Dyslipidemia | 2 (15.4) |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | 1 (7.7) |
| Sarcoidosis | 1 (7.7) |
| Chronic sinusitis | 1 (7.7) |
| Gastric cancer | 1 (7.7) |
| Breast cancer | 1 (7.7) |
| Uterine myoma | 1 (7.7) |
| Ovarian cyst | 1 (7.7) |
Fig. 2Serum creatinine concentrations before treatment, at 1 month after initiation of AMK, at 3 months after initiation of AMK, and at the end of treatment
Clinical characteristics of patients with Mycobacterium abscessus receiving intravenous amikacin therapy
| Case | Age | Body Weight (Kg) | Dose of AMK (mg)/(mg/kg) | Duration of AMK therapy(months) | Prior Treatment | Regimen at Initiation of AMK | Sputum Conversion after AMK therapy | Sputum Conversion 1 year after AMK therapy | Radiological Findings after AMK therapy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 68 | 37 | 400/10.8 | 6 | CAM,EB,RFP | CAM,EB,RFP,FAM | - | - | Unchanged |
| #2 | 54 | 49. | 600/12.2 | 3 | CAM,EB,RFP,LVFX | CAM,FAM,STFX | + | + | Improved |
| #3 | 59 | 56 | 700/12.5 | 4 | CAM,EB,RFP | CAM,FAM,STFX | + | + | Improved |
| #4 | 66 | 48 | 400/15.0 | 4 | CAM,EB,RFP | CAM,FAM,STFX | + | + | Improved |
| #5 | 61 | 46 | 400/8.3 | 4 | CAM,EB,RFP,SM | CAM,EB,FAM,STFX | + | + | Improved |
| #6 | 86 | 49 | 600/12.2 | 8 | CAM,IPM/CS | CAM,FAM,LVFX | + | - | Improved |
| #7 | 50 | 36 | 500/13.9 | 9 | - | CAM,FAM,MINO | + | + | Worsened |
| #8 | 56 | 40 | 600/15.0 | 4 | - | CAM,IPM/CS,MINO | + | + | Improved |
| #9 | 62 | 52 | 750/14.4 | 4 | CAM,EB,RFP,LVFX, | CAM,IPM/CS,MINO | + | + | Worsened |
| #10 | 65 | 46 | 600/13.0 | 4 | CAM,EB,RFP,SM,STFX,FAM | CAM,RFP,FAM | + | + | Worsened |
| #11 | 69 | 43 | 700/16.2 | 4 | - | CAM,IPM/CS | - | - | Worsened |
| #12 | 67 | 35 | 400/11.4 | 9 | CAM,EB,RFP,SM | CAM,RFP,FAM | - | - | Unchanged |
| #13 | 65 | 44 | 400/9.1 | 6 | CAM,EB,RFP | CAM,FAM | + | - | Improved |
M male, F female, CAM clarithromycin, EB ethambutol, RFP rifampicin, LVFX levofloxacin, SM streptomycin, STFX sitafloxacin, FAM faropenem, IPM/CS imipenem/cilostazol, MINO minocycline
Clinical symptoms before and after amikacin treatment
| Clinical symptom | Before treatment ( | After treatment ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Cough | 12 (92.3 %) | 9 (69.2 %) | 0.027 |
| Sputum | 11 (84.6 %) | 7 (53.8 %) | 0.182 |
| Dyspnea | 5 (38.5 %) | 2 (15.4 %) | 0.114 |
| Hemoptysis | 3 (23.1 %) | 0 (0.0 %) | 0.004 |
| Fever | 2 (15.4 %) | 1 (7.7 %) | 0.009 |
| Fatigue | 2 (15.4 %) | 1 (7.7 %) | 0.009 |
| Night sweat | 0 (0.0 %) | 0 (0.0 %) | - |
Data are presented as n (%) *:McNemar’s test