| Literature DB >> 31159302 |
Ekaterina Blinova1,2, Dmitry Roshchin3, Evgenya Kogan4, Elena Samishina5, Tatiana Demura6, Olga Deryabina7, Irina Suslova8, Dmitry Blinov9, Pavel Zhdanov10, Usif Osmanov11, Mikhail Nelipa12, Andrey Kaprin13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Establishment of heterotopic patient-derived xenografts of primary and relapsed non-muscular invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) to explore the biological property of PD-L1 signaling that may impact bladder tumor growth in humanized animals.Entities:
Keywords: anti-PD-L1 treatment; metastasis; molecular subtypes; non-muscular invasive bladder cancer; patient-derived xenograft
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31159302 PMCID: PMC6628037 DOI: 10.3390/cells8060526
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
The list of patients from whom the tumor tissues have been taken for patient-derived xenografts (PDX) establishment.
| No | Sex | Age | The Tumor Source | Tumor Histology | Grade, Stage | PDX | PDX’s Metastasis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Male | 47 | Primarynode | Urothelial papillary carcinoma | Grade 1 T1 | Established | Lung |
| 2 | Female | 67 | Primarynode | Glandular carcinoma | Garde 2 T1 | Established | Lung |
| 3 | Male | 61 | Primarynode | Micropapillary carcinoma | Grade 2 T1 | Established | Lung |
| 4 | Male | 53 | Relapsed node | Urothelial papillary carcinoma | Grade 3 T1 | Established | Lung |
| 5 | Female | 72 | Relapsed node | Squamous carcinoma | Grade 2 T1 | Established | Lung |
| 6 | Male | 59 | Relapsed node | Urothelial papillary carcinoma | Grade 3 T1 | Established | Lung |
Figure 1(A) PD-L1 expression in bladder cancer PDXs in dependence on PD-L1 treatment; PD-L1 expression as scatterplots of individual % of positively stained tumor cells with estimated median for maternal tumor used for engraftment (I), for PDX of control subgroup mice (II), and animals (III) utilized specific therapy (n = 20 in maternal tumor group; n = 10 in each subgroup); p < 0.05 when compared with control (Student’s t-test). (B) PD-L1-positive staining of primary luminal (1), basal (2), and p53 subtypes (3) of NMIBC, and relapsed luminal (4), basal (5), and p53 (6) subtypes of bladder cancer in maternal tumor’s specimens; IHC staining, x600.
Figure 2(A) Average survival of animals in experimental groups; average survival (n = 10) presented in days of life (scatterplots and median); ÷ p < 0.05 when compared with control (Gehan’s criterion with Yates’s correction). (B) Expression of GATA 3 (1, 4, 7, and 10), KRT 5/6 (2, 5, 8, and 11), and p53 (3, 6, 9, and 12) in maternal tumor’s specimens and in established PDX’s ones; IHC staining, ×600.
Treatment inhibits bladder cancer PDXs growth and lung metastasis (initially n = 10 in each subgroup).
| Tumor Subtype | T/C Index | Tumor-Doubling Time, Days | Number of Metastasis, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 7 | Day 14 | Day 21 | ||||
| Primary luminal NMIBC | 89 | 80 | 76 | V | 9.4 ± 0.3 | 24.6 ± 3.9 |
| D | 21.2 ± 2.8 † | 0 ± 0 † | ||||
| Primary basal NMIBC | 71 | 65 | 63 | V | 10.8 ± 1.6 | 16.5 ± 2.4 |
| D | 17.3 ± 1.7 † | 4.3 ± 1.7 † | ||||
| p53 NMIBC | 32 | 17 | 4 | V | 8.3 ± 0.9 | 44.7 ± 4.5 ‡ |
| D | 12.7 ± 2.6 | 16.2 ± 5.8 † | ||||
| Relapsed luminal NMIBC | 76 | 62 | 50 | V | 9.6 ± 0.7 | 56.1 ± 6.4 ‡ |
| D | 15.2 ± 1.4 † | 13.5 ± 4.3 † | ||||
| Relapsed basal NMIBC | 77 | 58 | 53 | V | 10.0 ± 0.5 | 47.8 ± 6.1 ‡ |
| D | 18.3 ± 1.9 † | 7.2 ± 3.5 † | ||||
| Relapsed p53 NMIBC | 47 | 29 | 17 | V | 10.1 ± 0.7 | 63.4 ± 7.5 ‡ |
| D | 13.4 ± 2.1 | 22.8 ± 5.4 † | ||||
Note: V—vehicle (control subgroup); D—Durvalumab treated mice; p < 0.05 when compared with relative control subgroup (Student’s t test); ‡ p < 0.05 when compared with primary both luminal and basal NMIBC subgroups (one-way ANOVA, the Tukey’s criterion).
Figure 3CD8+ population of T cells in PDX’s tumor specimens of mice utilized anti-PD-L1 specific treatment. IHC staining, ×600.
CD8+ expression in tumor specimens and serum sPD-L1 level in mice, non-muscular invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) PDXs carriers, depending on specific pharmacological intervention utilized (n = 10 in each subgroup).
| No | Tumor Subtype | Subgroup | CD8+ Expression, % | sPD-L1, ng/mL | Correlation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Primary luminal NMIBC | V | 27.6 ± 2.7 | 17.6 ± 1.4 | |
| D | 33.4 ± 4.1 | 2.7 ± 0.5 † | |||
| 2 | Primary basal NMIBC | V | 18.5 ± 3.2 | 21.8 ± 4.3 | |
| D | 25.7 ± 2.9 | 4.1 ± 1.3 † | |||
| 3 | Primary p53 NMIBC | V | 3.6 ± 1.1 ‡ | 31.5 ± 3.6 ‡ | |
| D | 5.4 ± 2.3 ‡ | 8.4 ± 2.8 ‡† | |||
| 4 | Relapsed luminal NMIBC | V | 19.2 ± 2.1 | 25.4 ± 2.0 | |
| D | 26.1 ± 3.5 | 6.2 ± 0.8 † | |||
| 5 | Relapsed basal NMIBC | V | 22.5 ± 2.1 | 18.4 ± 1.3 | |
| D | 27.7 ± 3.8 | 5.2 ± 1.2 † | |||
| 6 | Relapsed p53 NMIBC | V | 2.1 ± 0.9 ‡ | 37.5 ± 3.8 ‡ | |
| D | 4.2 ± 1.5 ‡ | 10.3 ± 2.1 ‡† |
Note: V—vehicle (control subgroup); D—Durvalumab-treated mice; † p < 0.05 when compared with relative control subgroup (Student’s t test); ‡ p < 0.05 when compared with primary both luminal and basal NMIBC subgroups (one-way ANOVA, Tukey’s criterion).