Literature DB >> 31158270

Prevalence and Cost of Care Cascades After Low-Value Preoperative Electrocardiogram for Cataract Surgery in Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries.

Ishani Ganguli1,2,3, Claire Lupo2, Alexander J Mainor4, Stephanie Raymond4, Qianfei Wang4, E John Orav2,5, Chiang-Hua Chang6, Nancy E Morden4, Meredith B Rosenthal7, Carrie H Colla4,8, Thomas D Sequist1,2,3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Low-value care is prevalent in the United States, yet little is known about the downstream health care use triggered by low-value services. Measurement of such care cascades is essential to understanding the full consequences of low-value care.
OBJECTIVE: To describe cascades (tests, treatments, visits, hospitalizations, and new diagnoses) after a common low-value service, preoperative electrocardiogram (EKG) for patients undergoing cataract surgery. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational cohort study using fee-for-service Medicare claims data from beneficiaries aged 66 years or older without known heart disease who were continuously enrolled between April 1, 2013, and September 30, 2015, and underwent cataract surgery between July 1, 2014 and June 30, 2015. Data were analyzed from March 12, 2018, to April 9, 2019. EXPOSURES: Receipt of a preoperative EKG. The comparison group included patients who underwent cataract surgery but did not receive a preoperative EKG. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Cascade event rates and associated spending in the 90 days after preoperative EKG, or in a matched timeframe for the comparison group. Secondary outcomes were patient, physician, and area-level characteristics associated with experiencing a potential cascade.
RESULTS: Among 110 183 cataract surgery recipients, 12 408 (11.3%) received a preoperative EKG (65.6% of them were female); of those, 1978 (15.9%) had at least 1 potential cascade event. The comparison group included 97 775 participants (63.1% female). Those who received a preoperative EKG experienced between 5.11 (95% CI, 3.96-6.25) and 10.92 (95% CI, 9.76-12.08) additional events per 100 beneficiaries relative to the comparison group. This included between 2.18 (95% CI, 1.34-3.02) and 7.98 (95% CI, 7.12-8.84) tests, 0.33 (95% CI, 0.19-0.46) treatments, 1.40 (95% CI, 1.18-1.62) new patient cardiology visits, and 1.21 (95% CI, 0.62-1.79) new cardiac diagnoses. Spending for the additional services was up to $565 per Medicare beneficiary (95% CI, $342-$775), or an estimated $35 025 923 annually across all Medicare beneficiaries in addition to the $3 275 712 paid for the preoperative EKGs. Among preoperative EKG recipients, those who were older (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for patients aged 75 to 84 years vs 66 to 74 years old, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.28-1.57), had more chronic conditions (aOR for each additional Elixhauser condition, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.14-1.22), lived in more cardiologist-dense areas (aOR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.09), or had their preoperative EKG performed by a cardiac specialist rather than a primary care physician (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10-1.43) were more likely to experience a potential cascade. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Care cascades after preoperative EKG for cataract surgery are infrequent but costly. Policy and practice interventions to reduce low-value services and the cascades that follow could yield substantial savings.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31158270      PMCID: PMC6547245          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.1739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  16 in total

1.  Limited Utility of Routine Tests Prior to Ophthalmologic Surgery: An Observational Study in a Japanese Hospital.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Matsuo; Yoshinori Takemura; Mitsuaki Yamazaki
Journal:  JMA J       Date:  2021-07-06

2.  Is Low-value Testing Before Low-risk Hand Surgery Associated With Increased Downstream Healthcare Use and Reimbursements? A National Claims Database Analysis.

Authors:  Jessica M Welch; Thompson Zhuang; Lauren M Shapiro; Alex H S Harris; Laurence C Baker; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  Association of Low-Value Testing With Subsequent Health Care Use and Clinical Outcomes Among Low-risk Primary Care Outpatients Undergoing an Annual Health Examination.

Authors:  Zachary Bouck; Andrew J Calzavara; Noah M Ivers; Eve A Kerr; Cherry Chu; Jacob Ferguson; Danielle Martin; Joshua Tepper; Peter C Austin; Peter Cram; Wendy Levinson; R Sacha Bhatia
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  A Health Systems Ethical Framework for De-implementation in Health Care.

Authors:  Alison S Baskin; Ton Wang; Jacquelyn Miller; Reshma Jagsi; Eve A Kerr; Lesly A Dossett
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 2.192

5.  Variability and Costs of Low-Value Preoperative Testing for Cataract Surgery Within the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Seshadri C Mudumbai; Suzann Pershing; Tom Bowe; Robin N Kamal; Erika D Sears; Mary T Hawn; Dan Eisenberg; Andrea K Finlay; Hildi Hagedorn; Alex H S Harris
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-05-03

6.  Longitudinal Content Analysis of the Characteristics and Expected Impact of Low-Value Services Identified in US Choosing Wisely Recommendations.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Nitya Thakore; Meredith B Rosenthal; Deborah Korenstein
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings in a US National Survey of Physicians.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Arabella L Simpkin; Claire Lupo; Arlene Weissman; Alexander J Mainor; E John Orav; Meredith B Rosenthal; Carrie H Colla; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-10-02

8.  Trends in Use of Low-Value Care in Traditional Fee-for-Service Medicare and Medicare Advantage.

Authors:  Sungchul Park; Jeah Jung; Robert E Burke; Eric B Larson
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-03-01

9.  High-deductible health plans and low-value imaging in the emergency department.

Authors:  Shih-Chuan Chou; Arthur S Hong; Scott G Weiner; J Frank Wharam
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.734

10.  Changing patterns of use of implantable cardiac monitors from 2011 to 2018 for a large commercially-insured U.S. population.

Authors:  Michael I Ellenbogen; Kathleen M Andersen; Joseph E Marine; Nae-Yuh Wang; Jodi B Segal
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.