Literature DB >> 34870673

Longitudinal Content Analysis of the Characteristics and Expected Impact of Low-Value Services Identified in US Choosing Wisely Recommendations.

Ishani Ganguli1,2, Nitya Thakore2, Meredith B Rosenthal3, Deborah Korenstein4,5.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The US Choosing Wisely campaign has had substantial reach in mobilizing efforts to reduce low-value care, achieved largely by engaging physician specialty societies in stewardship. While some early recommendations were criticized for avoiding revenue-generating services, there is limited evidence of how the composition of recommendations shifted as more societies contributed.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the characteristics and expected impact of Choosing Wisely recommendations. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study included content and trend analyses of all 626 Choosing Wisely recommendations by US physician societies as of March 1, 2021. Data were analyzed between March and May 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcomes were proportions of identified low-value services by characteristics (society type, service type, indication, do vs avoid, and clinical context) and expected impact (effect on the revenue of society members, cost, number of individuals at risk, direct harm potential, and cascade potential).
RESULTS: Low-value services identified in the 626 Choosing Wisely recommendations largely covered imaging (168 [26.8%]) and laboratory studies (156 [24.9%]) in the context of chronic conditions (169 [27.0%]) and healthy patients with risk factors alone (126 [20.1%]). Most of the identified low-value services were revenue neutral for the recommending society (402 [64.2%]) and the plurality were low cost (<$200; 284 [45.4%]); low-cost services represented a growing share of low-value services identified by Choosing Wisely recommendations (1.2 percentage points per year; P = .001). Nearly half (280 [44.7%]) of recommendations identified services with high direct harm potential, and 388 (62.0%) identified those with high potential for cascades (ie, triggering downstream services). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this qualitative study suggest that the Choosing Wisely recommendations identified services with a range of expected impacts. Stakeholders could explicitly set priorities for future recommendations, while clinical leaders and payers might target intervention efforts on recommendations with the greatest potential for impact based on spending across populations, direct harms, and cascades.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 34870673      PMCID: PMC8649907          DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6911

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  38 in total

1.  Predictive modeling of U.S. health care spending in late life.

Authors:  Liran Einav; Amy Finkelstein; Sendhil Mullainathan; Ziad Obermeyer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  ACOs with risk-bearing experience are likely taking steps to reduce low-value medical services.

Authors:  Margje H Haverkamp; David Peiris; Alexander J Mainor; Gert P Westert; Meredith B Rosenthal; Thomas D Sequist; Carrie H Colla
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.229

3.  Development of a Conceptual Map of Negative Consequences for Patients of Overuse of Medical Tests and Treatments.

Authors:  Deborah Korenstein; Susan Chimonas; Brooke Barrow; Salomeh Keyhani; Aaron Troy; Allison Lipitz-Snyderman
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 21.873

4.  Prevalence and Cost of Care Cascades After Low-Value Preoperative Electrocardiogram for Cataract Surgery in Fee-for-Service Medicare Beneficiaries.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Claire Lupo; Alexander J Mainor; Stephanie Raymond; Qianfei Wang; E John Orav; Chiang-Hua Chang; Nancy E Morden; Meredith B Rosenthal; Carrie H Colla; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Choosing wisely in emergency medicine: Early results and insights from the ACEP emergency quality network (E-QUAL).

Authors:  Arjun K Venkatesh; Jean Elizabeth Scofi; Craig Rothenberg; Carl T Berdahl; Nalani Tarrant; Dhruv Sharma; Pawan Goyal; Randy Pilgrim; Kevin Klauer; Jeremiah D Schuur
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  Do choosing wisely recommendations about low-value care target income-generating treatments provided by members? A content analysis of 1293 recommendations.

Authors:  Joshua R Zadro; John Farey; Ian A Harris; Christopher G Maher
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings in a US National Survey of Physicians.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Arabella L Simpkin; Claire Lupo; Arlene Weissman; Alexander J Mainor; E John Orav; Meredith B Rosenthal; Carrie H Colla; Thomas D Sequist
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-10-02

8.  Unpacking the complexities of de-implementing inappropriate health interventions.

Authors:  Wynne E Norton; David A Chambers
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  Assessment of Prevalence and Cost of Care Cascades After Routine Testing During the Medicare Annual Wellness Visit.

Authors:  Ishani Ganguli; Claire Lupo; Alexander J Mainor; Qianfei Wang; E John Orav; Meredith B Rosenthal; Thomas D Sequist; Carrie H Colla
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 10.  Effects of Monetary Incentives in Physician Groups: A Systematic Review of Reviews.

Authors:  Ann-Kathrin Heider; Harald Mang
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 2.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.