T E Baldock1, L R Brown2, R C McLean2. 1. County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust, Darlington Memorial Hospital, Darlington, UK. 2. Health Education England North East, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, several management options have been used in the management of perforated diverticulitis, ranging from conservative treatment to laparotomy. General surgery has also become increasingly specialised over time. This retrospective cohort study investigated changes in patient outcomes following perforated diverticulitis, management approach and the influence of consultant subspecialisation over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was collected on patients admitted with perforated diverticulitis in the North of England between 2002 and 2016. Subspecialisation was categorised as colorectal or other general subspecialties. The primary outcome of interest was overall 30-day mortality; secondary outcomes included surgical approach, stoma and anastomosis rate. RESULTS: A total of 3394 cases of perforated diverticulitis were analysed (colorectal, n = 1290 and other subspecialists, n = 2104) with a 30-day mortality of 11.6%. There was a significant reduction in mortality over time (2002-2006: 18.6% to 2012-2016: 6.8, P < 0.001).There was a significant reduction in open surgery (60% to 25.3%, P < 0.001) with increased conservative management (37.4% to 63.5%, P < 0.001), laparoscopic resection (0.1% to 4.9%, P < 0.001) and laparoscopic washout (0.1% to 5.7%, P < 0.001).Patients admitted under colorectal surgeons had lower mortality than other subspecialists (9.9% vs 12.4%, P = 0.027), which remained significant following multivariate adjustment (hazard ratio 1.44, P = 0.039). These patients had fewer stomas (13.9% vs. 21.0%, P = 0.001) and higher anastomosis rates (22.1% vs 15.8%, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated considerable improvements in the management of perforated diverticulitis alongside the positive impact of subspecialisation on patient outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, several management options have been used in the management of perforated diverticulitis, ranging from conservative treatment to laparotomy. General surgery has also become increasingly specialised over time. This retrospective cohort study investigated changes in patient outcomes following perforated diverticulitis, management approach and the influence of consultant subspecialisation over time. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data was collected on patients admitted with perforated diverticulitis in the North of England between 2002 and 2016. Subspecialisation was categorised as colorectal or other general subspecialties. The primary outcome of interest was overall 30-day mortality; secondary outcomes included surgical approach, stoma and anastomosis rate. RESULTS: A total of 3394 cases of perforated diverticulitis were analysed (colorectal, n = 1290 and other subspecialists, n = 2104) with a 30-day mortality of 11.6%. There was a significant reduction in mortality over time (2002-2006: 18.6% to 2012-2016: 6.8, P < 0.001).There was a significant reduction in open surgery (60% to 25.3%, P < 0.001) with increased conservative management (37.4% to 63.5%, P < 0.001), laparoscopic resection (0.1% to 4.9%, P < 0.001) and laparoscopic washout (0.1% to 5.7%, P < 0.001).Patients admitted under colorectal surgeons had lower mortality than other subspecialists (9.9% vs 12.4%, P = 0.027), which remained significant following multivariate adjustment (hazard ratio 1.44, P = 0.039). These patients had fewer stomas (13.9% vs. 21.0%, P = 0.001) and higher anastomosis rates (22.1% vs 15.8%, P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated considerable improvements in the management of perforated diverticulitis alongside the positive impact of subspecialisation on patient outcomes.
Authors: Renato Costi; François Cauchy; Alban Le Bian; Jean-François Honart; Nicolas Creuze; Claude Smadja Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2012-01-25 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Sekhar Dharmarajan; Steven R Hunt; Elisa H Birnbaum; James W Fleshman; Matthew G Mutch Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Massimo Sartelli; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Federico Coccolini; Ewen A Griffiths; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Salomone Di Saverio; Jan Ulrych; Yoram Kluger; Ofir Ben-Ishay; Frederick A Moore; Rao R Ivatury; Raul Coimbra; Andrew B Peitzman; Ari Leppaniemi; Gustavo P Fraga; Ronald V Maier; Osvaldo Chiara; Jeffry Kashuk; Boris Sakakushev; Dieter G Weber; Rifat Latifi; Walter Biffl; Miklosh Bala; Aleksandar Karamarkovic; Kenji Inaba; Carlos A Ordonez; Andreas Hecker; Goran Augustin; Zaza Demetrashvili; Renato Bessa Melo; Sanjay Marwah; Sanoop K Zachariah; Vishal G Shelat; Michael McFarlane; Miran Rems; Carlos Augusto Gomes; Mario Paulo Faro; Gerson Alves Pereira Júnior; Ionut Negoi; Yunfeng Cui; Norio Sato; Andras Vereczkei; Giovanni Bellanova; Arianna Birindelli; Isidoro Di Carlo; Kenneth Y Kok; Mahir Gachabayov; Georgios Gkiokas; Konstantinos Bouliaris; Elif Çolak; Arda Isik; Daniel Rios-Cruz; Rodolfo Soto; Ernest E Moore Journal: World J Emerg Surg Date: 2016-07-29 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: M Fernanda Bellolio; Herbert C Heien; Lindsey R Sangaralingham; Molly M Jeffery; Ronna L Campbell; Daniel Cabrera; Nilay D Shah; Erik P Hess Journal: West J Emerg Med Date: 2017-07-19
Authors: A Kohl; J Rosenberg; D Bock; T Bisgaard; S Skullman; A Thornell; J Gehrman; E Angenete; E Haglind Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2018-04-16 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Nick Freemantle; Matthew Richardson; John Wood; Daniel Ray; Sajan Khosla; Ping Sun; Domenico Pagano Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2013-01-30 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: R Nascimbeni; A Amato; R Cirocchi; A Serventi; A Laghi; M Bellini; G Tellan; M Zago; C Scarpignato; G A Binda Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Ivan Facile; Raffaele Galli; Alberto Posabella; Raoul André Droeser; Pavlo Dinter; Robert Rosenberg; Markus Von Flüe; Daniel Christian Steinemann Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 3.445