Safiya Richardson1, Eugene Lucas2, Stuart L Cohen2, Meng Zhang2, Guang Qiu2, Sundas Khan2, Thomas McGinn2. 1. Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 600 Community Drive, Suite 403, Manhasset, NY 11030. Electronic address: srichard12@northwell.edu. 2. Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, 600 Community Drive, Suite 403, Manhasset, NY 11030.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The benefits of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis must be weighed against its risks, radiation-induced malignancy, and contrast-induced nephropathy. Appropriate use of CTPA can be assessed by monitoring yield, the percentage of tests positive for PE. We identify factors that are associated low CTPA yield, which may predict overtesting. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of six emergency departments between June 2014 and February 2017. The electronic health record was queried for CTPAs ordered for adult patients in the emergency department. We assessed the following patient factors: age, gender, body mass index, number of comorbidities, race, and ethnicity, provider factors: type (resident, fellow, attending, physician assistant) and environment factors: test time of day, season of visit, and crowdedness of the department. RESULTS: A total of 14,782 CTPAs were reviewed, of which 1366 were found to be positive for PE, resulting in an overall CTPA yield of 9.24%. Provider type was not associated with a difference in yield. Testing was less likely to be positive in younger patients, females, those with lower body mass indexes and those identifying as Asian or Hispanic. Testing was also less likely to be positive when ordered during the overnight shift and during the winter and spring seasons. CONCLUSION: Our study identified several patient and environmental factors associated with low CTPA yield suggesting potential targets for overtesting. Targeting education and clinical decision support to assist providers in these circumstances may meaningfully improve yields.
BACKGROUND: The benefits of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for pulmonary embolism (PE) diagnosis must be weighed against its risks, radiation-induced malignancy, and contrast-induced nephropathy. Appropriate use of CTPA can be assessed by monitoring yield, the percentage of tests positive for PE. We identify factors that are associated low CTPA yield, which may predict overtesting. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of six emergency departments between June 2014 and February 2017. The electronic health record was queried for CTPAs ordered for adult patients in the emergency department. We assessed the following patient factors: age, gender, body mass index, number of comorbidities, race, and ethnicity, provider factors: type (resident, fellow, attending, physician assistant) and environment factors: test time of day, season of visit, and crowdedness of the department. RESULTS: A total of 14,782 CTPAs were reviewed, of which 1366 were found to be positive for PE, resulting in an overall CTPA yield of 9.24%. Provider type was not associated with a difference in yield. Testing was less likely to be positive in younger patients, females, those with lower body mass indexes and those identifying as Asian or Hispanic. Testing was also less likely to be positive when ordered during the overnight shift and during the winter and spring seasons. CONCLUSION: Our study identified several patient and environmental factors associated with low CTPA yield suggesting potential targets for overtesting. Targeting education and clinical decision support to assist providers in these circumstances may meaningfully improve yields.
Authors: Frank S Drescher; Sharad Chandrika; Ian D Weir; Jeffrey T Weintraub; Lewis Berman; Ronald Lee; Patricia D Van Buskirk; Yun Wang; Adeshola Adewunmi; Jonathan M Fine Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2010-11-02 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Mark D Mamlouk; Eric vanSonnenberg; Rishi Gosalia; David Drachman; Daniel Gridley; Jesus G Zamora; Giovanna Casola; Sanford Ornstein Journal: Radiology Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Aaron R Folsom; Pamela L Lutsey; Vijay Nambi; Christopher R deFilippi; Susan R Heckbert; Mary Cushman; Christie M Ballantyne Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Amy Berrington de González; Mahadevappa Mahesh; Kwang-Pyo Kim; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Rebecca Lewis; Fred Mettler; Charles Land Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2009-12-14
Authors: Christopher Kabrhel; Raphaëlle Varraso; Samuel Z Goldhaber; Eric B Rimm; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2009-04-16 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: David Mountain; Gerben Keijzers; Kevin Chu; Anthony Joseph; Catherine Read; Gabriel Blecher; Jeremy Furyk; Chrianna Bharat; Karthik Velusamy; Andrew Munro; Kylie Baker; Frances Kinnear; Ahses Mukherjee; Gina Watkins; Paul Buntine; Georgia Livesay; Daniel Fatovich Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-12-05 Impact factor: 3.240