Omid Abbasi1, Jan Hirschmann2, Georg Schmitz3, Alfons Schnitzler2, Markus Butz2. 1. Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany; Department of Medical Engineering, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany. Electronic address: Omid.Abbasi@med.uni-duesseldorf.de. 2. Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Germany. 3. Department of Medical Engineering, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recording brain activity during deep brain stimulation (DBS) using magnetoencephalography (MEG) can potentially help clarifying the neurophysiological mechanism of DBS. The DBS artefact, however, distorts MEG data significantly. We present an artefact rejection approach to remove the DBS artefact from MEG data. NEW METHODS: We developed an approach consisting of four consecutive steps: (i) independent component analysis was used to decompose MEG data to independent components (ICs); (ii) mutual information (MI) between stimulation signal and all ICs was calculated; (iii) artefactual ICs were identified by means of an MI threshold; and (iv) the MEG signal was reconstructed using only non-artefactual ICs. This approach was applied to MEG data from five Parkinson's disease patients with implanted DBS stimulators. MEG was recorded with DBS ON (unilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus) and DBS OFF during two experimental conditions: a visual attention task and alternating right and left median nerve stimulation. RESULTS: With the presented approach most of the artefact could be removed. The signal of interest could be retrieved in both conditions. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: In contrast to existing artefact rejection methods for MEG-DBS data (tSSS and S(3)P), the proposed method uses the actual artefact source, i.e. the stimulation signal, as reference signal. CONCLUSIONS: Using the presented method, the DBS artefact can be significantly rejected and the physiological data can be restored. This will facilitate research addressing the impact of DBS on brain activity during rest and various tasks.
BACKGROUND: Recording brain activity during deep brain stimulation (DBS) using magnetoencephalography (MEG) can potentially help clarifying the neurophysiological mechanism of DBS. The DBS artefact, however, distorts MEG data significantly. We present an artefact rejection approach to remove the DBS artefact from MEG data. NEW METHODS: We developed an approach consisting of four consecutive steps: (i) independent component analysis was used to decompose MEG data to independent components (ICs); (ii) mutual information (MI) between stimulation signal and all ICs was calculated; (iii) artefactual ICs were identified by means of an MI threshold; and (iv) the MEG signal was reconstructed using only non-artefactual ICs. This approach was applied to MEG data from five Parkinson's diseasepatients with implanted DBS stimulators. MEG was recorded with DBS ON (unilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus) and DBS OFF during two experimental conditions: a visual attention task and alternating right and left median nerve stimulation. RESULTS: With the presented approach most of the artefact could be removed. The signal of interest could be retrieved in both conditions. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: In contrast to existing artefact rejection methods for MEG-DBS data (tSSS and S(3)P), the proposed method uses the actual artefact source, i.e. the stimulation signal, as reference signal. CONCLUSIONS: Using the presented method, the DBS artefact can be significantly rejected and the physiological data can be restored. This will facilitate research addressing the impact of DBS on brain activity during rest and various tasks.
Authors: Matthew J Boring; Zachary F Jessen; Thomas A Wozny; Michael J Ward; Ashley C Whiteman; R Mark Richardson; Avniel Singh Ghuman Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2019-05-31 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Lennard I Boon; Arjan Hillebrand; Wouter V Potters; Rob M A de Bie; Naomi Prent; Maarten Bot; P Richard Schuurman; Cornelis J Stam; Anne-Fleur van Rootselaar; Henk W Berendse Journal: Neuroimage Clin Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 4.881
Authors: Richard Wennberg; J Martin Del Campo; Nat Shampur; Nathan C Rowland; Taufik Valiante; Andres M Lozano; Luis Garcia Dominguez Journal: Epilepsia Open Date: 2016-12-09