Literature DB >> 31149765

When and where plant-soil feedback may promote plant coexistence: a meta-analysis.

Kerri M Crawford1, Jonathan T Bauer2,3, Liza S Comita4, Maarten B Eppinga5, Daniel J Johnson6, Scott A Mangan7, Simon A Queenborough4, Allan E Strand8, Katharine N Suding9, James Umbanhowar10, James D Bever11.   

Abstract

Plant-soil feedback (PSF) theory provides a powerful framework for understanding plant dynamics by integrating growth assays into predictions of whether soil communities stabilise plant-plant interactions. However, we lack a comprehensive view of the likelihood of feedback-driven coexistence, partly because of a failure to analyse pairwise PSF, the metric directly linked to plant species coexistence. Here, we determine the relative importance of plant evolutionary history, traits, and environmental factors for coexistence through PSF using a meta-analysis of 1038 pairwise PSF measures. Consistent with eco-evolutionary predictions, feedback is more likely to mediate coexistence for pairs of plant species (1) associating with similar guilds of mycorrhizal fungi, (2) of increasing phylogenetic distance, and (3) interacting with native microbes. We also found evidence for a primary role of pathogens in feedback-mediated coexistence. By combining results over several independent studies, our results confirm that PSF may play a key role in plant species coexistence, species invasion, and the phylogenetic diversification of plant communities.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd/CNRS.

Keywords:  coexistence; meta-analysis; mutualists; pathogens; phylogenetic relatedness; plant-soil feedback; soil communities

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31149765     DOI: 10.1111/ele.13278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  23 in total

1.  Short-lived legacies of Prunus serotina plant-soil feedbacks.

Authors:  Clarice M Esch; Richard K Kobe
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Distribution of plant mycorrhizal traits along an elevational gradient does not fully mirror the latitudinal gradient.

Authors:  C Guillermo Bueno; M Gerz; M Moora; D Leon; D Gomez-Garcia; D García de Leon; X Font; Saleh Al-Quraishy; Wael N Hozzein; M Zobel
Journal:  Mycorrhiza       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.387

3.  Soil microbes alter seedling performance and biotic interactions under plant competition and contrasting light conditions.

Authors:  Nianxun Xi; Juliette M G Bloor; Chengjin Chu
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 4.357

4.  Changes in precipitation patterns can destabilize plant species coexistence via changes in plant-soil feedback.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Dudenhöffer; Noah C Luecke; Kerri M Crawford
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  A quantitative synthesis of soil microbial effects on plant species coexistence.

Authors:  Xinyi Yan; Jonathan M Levine; Gaurav S Kandlikar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  The soil biotic community protects Rhododendron spp. across multiple clades from the oomycete Phytophthora cinnamomi at a cost to plant growth.

Authors:  Yu Liu; Juliana S Medeiros; Jean H Burns
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The effects of plant-soil feedback on invasion resistance are soil context dependent.

Authors:  Pengdong Chen; Qiaoqiao Huang; Yanhui Zhuge; Chongwei Li; Ping Zhu; Yuping Hou
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Arbuscular mycorrhizal trees influence the latitudinal beta-diversity gradient of tree communities in forests worldwide.

Authors:  Yonglin Zhong; Chengjin Chu; Jonathan A Myers; Gregory S Gilbert; James A Lutz; Jonas Stillhard; Kai Zhu; Jill Thompson; Jennifer L Baltzer; Fangliang He; Joseph A LaManna; Stuart J Davies; Kristina J Aderson-Teixeira; David F R P Burslem; Alfonso Alonso; Kuo-Jung Chao; Xugao Wang; Lianming Gao; David A Orwig; Xue Yin; Xinghua Sui; Zhiyao Su; Iveren Abiem; Pulchérie Bissiengou; Norm Bourg; Nathalie Butt; Min Cao; Chia-Hao Chang-Yang; Wei-Chun Chao; Hazel Chapman; Yu-Yun Chen; David A Coomes; Susan Cordell; Alexandre A de Oliveira; Hu Du; Suqin Fang; Christian P Giardina; Zhanqing Hao; Andrew Hector; Stephen P Hubbell; David Janík; Patrick A Jansen; Mingxi Jiang; Guangze Jin; David Kenfack; Kamil Král; Andrew J Larson; Buhang Li; Xiankun Li; Yide Li; Juyu Lian; Luxiang Lin; Feng Liu; Yankun Liu; Yu Liu; Fuchen Luan; Yahuang Luo; Keping Ma; Yadvinder Malhi; Sean M McMahon; William McShea; Hervé Memiaghe; Xiangcheng Mi; Mike Morecroft; Vojtech Novotny; Michael J O'Brien; Jan den Ouden; Geoffrey G Parker; Xiujuan Qiao; Haibao Ren; Glen Reynolds; Pavel Samonil; Weiguo Sang; Guochun Shen; Zhiqiang Shen; Guo-Zhang Michael Song; I-Fang Sun; Hui Tang; Songyan Tian; Amanda L Uowolo; María Uriarte; Bin Wang; Xihua Wang; Youshi Wang; George D Weiblen; Zhihong Wu; Nianxun Xi; Wusheng Xiang; Han Xu; Kun Xu; Wanhui Ye; Mingjian Yu; Fuping Zeng; Minhua Zhang; Yingming Zhang; Li Zhu; Jess K Zimmerman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Does pollen limitation limit plant ranges? Evidence and implications.

Authors:  Emma Dawson-Glass; Anna L Hargreaves
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  Plant-soil feedbacks help explain biodiversity-productivity relationships.

Authors:  Leslie E Forero; Andrew Kulmatiski; Josephine Grenzer; Jeanette M Norton
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.