Literature DB >> 35605114

A quantitative synthesis of soil microbial effects on plant species coexistence.

Xinyi Yan1, Jonathan M Levine2, Gaurav S Kandlikar3,4.   

Abstract

Soil microorganisms play a major role in shaping plant diversity, not only through their direct effects as pathogens, mutualists, and decomposers, but also by altering the outcome of plant interactions. In particular, previous research has shown that the soil community often generates frequency-dependent feedback loops among plants that can either stabilize or destabilize species interactions and thereby promote or hinder species coexistence. However, recent insights from modern coexistence theory have shown that microbial effects on plant coexistence depend not only on these stabilizing or destabilizing effects, but also on the degree to which they generate competitive fitness differences. While many previous experiments have generated the data necessary for evaluating microbially mediated fitness differences, these effects have rarely been quantified in the literature. Here, we present a meta-analysis of data from 50 studies, which we used to quantify the microbially mediated (de)stabilization and fitness differences derived from a classic plant-soil feedback model. We found that across 518 plant species pairs, soil microbes generated both stabilization (or destabilization) and fitness differences, but also that the microbially mediated fitness differences dominated. As a consequence, if plants are otherwise equivalent competitors, the balance of soil microbe–generated (de)stabilization and fitness differences drives species exclusion much more frequently than coexistence or priority effects. Our work shows that microbially mediated fitness differences are an important but overlooked effect of soil microbes on plant coexistence. This finding paves the way for a more complete understanding of the processes that maintain plant biodiversity.

Entities:  

Keywords:  competition; fitness differences; modern coexistence theory; plant-soil feedbacks; plant–microbe interactions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35605114      PMCID: PMC9295794          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2122088119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   12.779


  49 in total

1.  Functional diversity of microbial decomposers facilitates plant coexistence in a plant-microbe-soil feedback model.

Authors:  Takeshi Miki; Masayuki Ushio; Shin Fukui; Michio Kondoh
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Reduced water-availability lowers the strength of negative plant-soil feedbacks of two Asclepias species.

Authors:  Amelia E Snyder; Alexandra N Harmon-Threatt
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Mixed evidence for plant-soil feedbacks in forest invasions.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Ping Zhu; Pengdong Chen; Qiaoqiao Huang; Xinfu Bai; Guangyan Ni; Yuping Hou
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Negative plant-phyllosphere feedbacks in native Asteraceae hosts - a novel extension of the plant-soil feedback framework.

Authors:  Briana K Whitaker; Jonathan T Bauer; James D Bever; Keith Clay
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  On the Consequences of the Interdependence of Stabilizing and Equalizing Mechanisms.

Authors:  Chuliang Song; György Barabás; Serguei Saavedra
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Specificity between Neotropical tree seedlings and their fungal mutualists leads to plant-soil feedback.

Authors:  Scott A Mangan; Edward A Herre; James D Bever
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.499

7.  A quantitative synthesis of soil microbial effects on plant species coexistence.

Authors:  Xinyi Yan; Jonathan M Levine; Gaurav S Kandlikar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 12.779

8.  MycoDB, a global database of plant response to mycorrhizal fungi.

Authors:  V Bala Chaudhary; Megan A Rúa; Anita Antoninka; James D Bever; Jeffery Cannon; Ashley Craig; Jessica Duchicela; Alicia Frame; Monique Gardes; Catherine Gehring; Michelle Ha; Miranda Hart; Jacob Hopkins; Baoming Ji; Nancy Collins Johnson; Wittaya Kaonongbua; Justine Karst; Roger T Koide; Louis J Lamit; James Meadow; Brook G Milligan; John C Moore; Thomas H Pendergast; Bridget Piculell; Blake Ramsby; Suzanne Simard; Shubha Shrestha; James Umbanhowar; Wolfgang Viechtbauer; Lawrence Walters; Gail W T Wilson; Peter C Zee; Jason D Hoeksema
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 6.444

9.  Mutualist and pathogen traits interact to affect plant community structure in a spatially explicit model.

Authors:  John W Schroeder; Andrew Dobson; Scott A Mangan; Daniel F Petticord; Edward Allen Herre
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The fungal collaboration gradient dominates the root economics space in plants.

Authors:  Joana Bergmann; Alexandra Weigelt; Fons van der Plas; Daniel C Laughlin; Thom W Kuyper; Nathaly Guerrero-Ramirez; Oscar J Valverde-Barrantes; Helge Bruelheide; Grégoire T Freschet; Colleen M Iversen; Jens Kattge; M Luke McCormack; Ina C Meier; Matthias C Rillig; Catherine Roumet; Marina Semchenko; Christopher J Sweeney; Jasper van Ruijven; Larry M York; Liesje Mommer
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  1 in total

1.  A quantitative synthesis of soil microbial effects on plant species coexistence.

Authors:  Xinyi Yan; Jonathan M Levine; Gaurav S Kandlikar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.