Literature DB >> 31149266

THE IMPACT OF LOUPE-ASSISTED INGUINAL VARICOCELECTOMY ON SEMEN QUALITY AND PREGNANCY RATE.

H Shafi1, M A Delavar2.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Open varicocelectomy is generally performed without microscopic equipment in Iran. We report our experience with loupe-assisted inguinal varicocelectomy, and its impact on semen parameters and pregnancy rate. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective interventional study on secondary data obtained from the medical records of 303 men with varicoceles, who underwent an inguinal varicocelectomy between March 2003 and April 2012. The surgical technique involved the use of a 3.0 × loupe during spermatic cord dissection at the level of the internal inguinal ring under spinal anesthesia. Semen samples were analyzed for sperm concentration, motility, and sperm morphology before the varicocelectomy and after 3 months. All the infertile patients were followed-up postoperatively for more than 1 year.
RESULTS: There were 9 (3.0%) varicocele recurrences and 3 (1.0%) hydroceles. After varicocelectomy, sperm concentration and motile spermatozoa increased. In addition, spermatozoa with normal morphology improved significantly postoperatively. Of the 303 subjects treated, 153 (83.2) had a 1-year preoperative history of infertility; the spontaneous pregnancy rate of the spouses during the follow-up period was reported to be 61.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this research indicated that varicocelectomy using loupe-assisted inguinal technique could improve semen parameters and pregnancy rate with a low postoperative complication rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Infertility; Pampiniform plexus veins; Semen; Varicocele

Year:  2018        PMID: 31149266      PMCID: PMC6516506          DOI: 10.4183/aeb.2018.252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)        ISSN: 1841-0987            Impact factor:   0.877


  24 in total

1.  Minimal invasiveness and effectivity of subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a comparative study with retroperitoneal high and laparoscopic approaches.

Authors:  Masami Watanabe; Atsushi Nagai; Norihiro Kusumi; Hiromu Tsuboi; Yasutomo Nasu; Hiromi Kumon
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.369

Review 2.  Role of oxidative stress in pathogenesis of varicocele and infertility.

Authors:  Ashok Agarwal; Rakesh K Sharma; Nisarg R Desai; Sushil Prabakaran; Antonio Tavares; Edmund Sabanegh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-01-23       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Male factor infertility: innovations in varicocele surgery.

Authors:  Joel Marmar
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Comparison of two different microsurgical methods in the treatment of varicocele.

Authors:  I Orhan; R Onur; A Semerciöz; F Firdolas; A Ardicoglu; I T Köksal
Journal:  Arch Androl       Date:  2005 May-Jun

5.  Veterinary and medical aspects of abortion in Danish sheep.

Authors:  Jørgen S Agerholm; Bent Aalbaek; Anne Marie Fog-Larsen; Mette Boye; Elisabeth Holm; Tim K Jensen; Tina Lindhardt; Lars E Larsen; David Buxton
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.205

Review 6.  Varicocele: red flag or red herring?

Authors:  Armand Zini; Jason M Boman
Journal:  Semin Reprod Med       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 1.303

7.  Male infertility.

Authors:  Randall B Meacham; Geoffrey F Joyce; Matthew Wise; Ashay Kparker; Craig Niederberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Surgery or embolisation for varicoceles in subfertile men.

Authors:  Johannes Hans L H Evers; John Collins; Jane Clarke
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-01-21

9.  Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: evaluation of the results.

Authors:  Rajeev Kumar; Narmada P Gupta
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 10.  The role of varicocele repair in the new era of assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Marcello Cocuzza; Mariana Amora Cocuzza; Frances Monette Papa Bragais; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.