Literature DB >> 16025860

Comparison of two different microsurgical methods in the treatment of varicocele.

I Orhan1, R Onur, A Semerciöz, F Firdolas, A Ardicoglu, I T Köksal.   

Abstract

We reviewed records from patients who underwent two different microsurgical varicocelectomy methods: 147 (high inguinal (MHIV) and 65 sub-inguinal (MSIV) microsurgery) to compare the therapeutic activity and complications. Patients who had 2 different microsurgical varicocelectomies were compared according to preoperative connected vein, number of designated arteries, postoperative semen and improvement degree in hormone parameters, increased ratio related with pregnancy and complications. The ratio of improvement of postoperative semen parameters in patients where MHIV and MSIV were performed was, 42% and 38% (p > 0.05). Pregnancy was achieved in MHIV at a ratio of 41% (34/82) and 33% (22/65) in MSIV (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference according to mean operation periods, the vein connected between the groups. The number of testicular arteries were significantly higher than the ones in MHIV (p < 0.01). However, as a postoperative complication, hydrocele was not seen in any of the patients, while relapses occurred in 1 MHIV and 2 MSIV patients. MHIV and MSIV techniques are effective methods to treat varicocele. However, the excess number of connected veins due to the anatomic feature of MSIV increases the possibility of relapses and the technical difficulty during surgical intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16025860     DOI: 10.1080/01485010590919648

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Androl        ISSN: 0148-5016


  10 in total

1.  Varicocelectomy: microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy is the treatment of choice.

Authors:  Saleh Binsaleh; Kirk C Lo
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Microanatomy of the spermatic cords during microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy: initial experience in Asian men.

Authors:  Xue-Ke Wang; Hong-Zhen Wang; Ding-Jun Fu; Ming-Kuen Lai
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.285

3.  THE IMPACT OF LOUPE-ASSISTED INGUINAL VARICOCELECTOMY ON SEMEN QUALITY AND PREGNANCY RATE.

Authors:  H Shafi; M A Delavar
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.877

4.  A retrospective review of single-institution outcomes with robotic-assisted microsurgical varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Andrew McCullough; Leon Elebyjian; Joseph Ellen; Clay Mechlin
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

5.  Factors Associated with Varicocele Recurrence After Microscopic Sub-Inguinal Varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Alkhamees; Saeed Bin Hamri; Turki Alhumaid; Layla Alissa; Haleema Al-Lishlish; Rula Abudalo; Zafar Iqbal; Ghufran Albajhan; Ahmed Alasker
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2020-12-15

6.  Inguinal and subinguinal micro-varicocelectomy, the optimal surgical management of varicocele: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun Wang; Shu-Jie Xia; Zhi-Hong Liu; Le Tao; Ji-Fu Ge; Chen-Min Xu; Jian-Xin Qiu
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 7.  Clinical Outcomes of Varicocele Repair in Infertile Men: A Review.

Authors:  Koji Chiba; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.400

Review 8.  Recurrent varicocele.

Authors:  Katherine Rotker; Mark Sigman
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Microscopic varicocelectomy as a treatment option for patients with severe oligospermia.

Authors:  Chirag Gupta; Arun Chinchole; Rupin Shah; Hemant Pathak; Deepa Talreja; Ankit Kayal
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2018-04-06

Review 10.  Varicocele management for infertility and pain: A systematic review.

Authors:  Scott D Lundy; Edmund S Sabanegh
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-12-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.