Literature DB >> 14646434

Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy: evaluation of the results.

Rajeev Kumar1, Narmada P Gupta.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Varicoceles have been established to be the commonest correctable cause of male infertility. Among the various methods available, microsurgical varicocelectomy has one of the lowest complication rates with low failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a 4-year period, 100 patients underwent microsurgical varicocelectomy at our center. One hundred and forty-four surgeries were performed on 90 of these patients through a subinguinal approach and these form the study group. Only clinically diagnosed varicoceles were operated. Pre-operative semen values were compared with the post-operative values and statistical analysis performed using a non-parametric test. All 90 patients provided at least 1 post-operative semen report 3 months after surgery while 50 are on complete follow-up.
RESULTS: Sperm count improved in 71% patients, normal motility in 60% and normal morphology in 49%. Seventeen of the 50 patients on full follow-up (34%) achieved pregnancy, with 16 of these being spontaneous. All patients achieving pregnancy showed improvement in sperm count, 13 improved in motility and 12 in morphology. All improvements were statistically significant. There were 21 (14.6%) minor complications with no testicular atrophy and 1 recurrence.
CONCLUSION: Microsurgical varicocelectomy is a safe and effective option for the management of varicocele-induced male infertility. It leads to improvement in all semen parameters and increases the possibility of spontaneous pregnancies. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14646434     DOI: 10.1159/000074087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  8 in total

1.  Ultrasonic predictors of improved seminal parameters after bilateral laparoscopic varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Darab Mehraban; Mahdi Taghdiri; Shahriar Nategh; Arash Ahmadzadeh; Neda Ranjbarnovin; Amir Pejman Hashemi Taheri
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Varicocele surgery or embolization: Which is better?

Authors:  Darby Cassidy; Keith Jarvi; Ethan Grober; Kirk Lo
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Varicocele and male infertility.

Authors:  Christian Fuglesang S Jensen; Peter Østergren; James M Dupree; Dana A Ohl; Jens Sønksen; Mikkel Fode
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  THE IMPACT OF LOUPE-ASSISTED INGUINAL VARICOCELECTOMY ON SEMEN QUALITY AND PREGNANCY RATE.

Authors:  H Shafi; M A Delavar
Journal:  Acta Endocrinol (Buchar)       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 0.877

5.  A retrospective review of single-institution outcomes with robotic-assisted microsurgical varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Andrew McCullough; Leon Elebyjian; Joseph Ellen; Clay Mechlin
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

6.  Factors Associated with Varicocele Recurrence After Microscopic Sub-Inguinal Varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Alkhamees; Saeed Bin Hamri; Turki Alhumaid; Layla Alissa; Haleema Al-Lishlish; Rula Abudalo; Zafar Iqbal; Ghufran Albajhan; Ahmed Alasker
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2020-12-15

Review 7.  Recurrent varicocele.

Authors:  Katherine Rotker; Mark Sigman
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Varicocele management for infertility and pain: A systematic review.

Authors:  Scott D Lundy; Edmund S Sabanegh
Journal:  Arab J Urol       Date:  2017-12-14
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.