BACKGROUND: The impact of prior radiation therapy on patient satisfaction following primary artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement is not well described, therefore our aim was to evaluate the effect of radiation on patient satisfaction among men undergoing primary AUS with and without a history of prior radiation. METHODS: From 1983-2011, 1,082 men underwent primary AUS placement at our institution. Of these, 467 were alive, with an intact primary AUS and invited to participate in a mailed survey assessing AUS status, patient satisfaction, and urinary control. Clinical subjective outcomes were assessed via reported change in urinary control from pre-operative to post-AUS placement. RESULTS: In total, 229/467 (49%) of men with an intact primary AUS completed the survey, with a median follow-up of 8.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 5.8-11.4]. Of these, 64 men (28%) had a prior history of radiation therapy. Both men with and without history of radiation, reported a high likelihood of electing to have AUS surgery again, 87% vs. 91% respectively (P=0.87), and of recommending AUS surgery to a family member, 86% vs. 93% respectively (P=0.18). There were no significant differences between those with and without prior radiation with regard to rates of reported: substantial improvement in urinary control following surgery (72% vs. 78%, P=0.30), minimal bothersome leakage (57.1% vs. 66%, P=0.31), and pad use ≤1 pad/day (49% vs. 59%, P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of primary AUS implants with and without prior radiation therapy we noted a high-level of satisfaction and though many patients still utilized 1 or more pads/day with long-term follow-up. Importantly, there was no significant difference in quality of life (QoL) outcomes compared between those with and without prior radiation therapy.
BACKGROUND: The impact of prior radiation therapy on patient satisfaction following primary artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) placement is not well described, therefore our aim was to evaluate the effect of radiation on patient satisfaction among men undergoing primary AUS with and without a history of prior radiation. METHODS: From 1983-2011, 1,082 men underwent primary AUS placement at our institution. Of these, 467 were alive, with an intact primary AUS and invited to participate in a mailed survey assessing AUS status, patient satisfaction, and urinary control. Clinical subjective outcomes were assessed via reported change in urinary control from pre-operative to post-AUS placement. RESULTS: In total, 229/467 (49%) of men with an intact primary AUS completed the survey, with a median follow-up of 8.4 years [interquartile range (IQR) 5.8-11.4]. Of these, 64 men (28%) had a prior history of radiation therapy. Both men with and without history of radiation, reported a high likelihood of electing to have AUS surgery again, 87% vs. 91% respectively (P=0.87), and of recommending AUS surgery to a family member, 86% vs. 93% respectively (P=0.18). There were no significant differences between those with and without prior radiation with regard to rates of reported: substantial improvement in urinary control following surgery (72% vs. 78%, P=0.30), minimal bothersome leakage (57.1% vs. 66%, P=0.31), and pad use ≤1 pad/day (49% vs. 59%, P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: In a large cohort of primary AUS implants with and without prior radiation therapy we noted a high-level of satisfaction and though many patients still utilized 1 or more pads/day with long-term follow-up. Importantly, there was no significant difference in quality of life (QoL) outcomes compared between those with and without prior radiation therapy.
Authors: Simon P Kim; Zubair Sarmast; Stephanie Daignault; Gary J Faerber; Edward J McGuire; Jerilyn M Latini Journal: J Urol Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jim C Hu; Xiangmei Gu; Stuart R Lipsitz; Michael J Barry; Anthony V D'Amico; Aaron C Weinberg; Nancy L Keating Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-10-14 Impact factor: 56.272