Literature DB >> 31143656

The influence of liver fat deposition on the quantification of the liver-iron fraction using fast-kilovolt-peak switching dual-energy CT imaging and material decomposition technique: an in vitro experimental study.

Tingting Xie1, Yongbin Li2, Guanyong He1, Zhen Zhang1, Qiao Shi1, Guanxun Cheng1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To assess the feasibility of dual-energy spectral computed tomography (DECT) for quantifying the liver iron content (LIC) with material decomposition (MD) technique in vitro.
METHODS: Liver-iron mixture samples (model A) and liver-iron-fat mixture samples (model B) were prepare and scanned by a single source DECT using GSI mode with successive tube currents of 200, 320, and 485 mA. A standard algorithm of 1.25 mm was used to reconstruct iron (fat) MD images and iron (water) MD images. The iron concentrations of all samples were measured and analyzed by Spearman's rank correlation and linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: Significant positive linear correlations were found between virtual iron content (VIC) and LIC in the absence of fat (model A) and in the presence of fat (model B) in the range of LIC 0 to 25 mg/mL. The lines of best fit to model A had slopes around 1.1 and an intercept around (-1.5) mg/mL for iron (water) MD images, and had slopes around 1.1 and an intercept around (-10) mg/mL for iron (fat) MD images. The lines of best fit to the model B had slopes around 1.5 and an intercept around (-15) mg/mL. At the same value of LIC (LIC >0), the VIC values of model A were always higher than those of model B. At the high value of LIC (12.5 mg/mL), the VIC values of model B were similar, but they differed greatly from those of model A.
CONCLUSIONS: The fast-kilovolt-peak switching dual-energy CT imaging and MD techniques allow for quantification of iron content. Fat and the post-reconstruction algorithm of iron (fat) MD images, were confounding factors, and led to the underestimation and overestimation of LIC, respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Single-source dual-energy CT; fat; iron; liver; material decomposition (MD)

Year:  2019        PMID: 31143656      PMCID: PMC6511718          DOI: 10.21037/qims.2019.04.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  27 in total

Review 1.  AGA technical review on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Arun J Sanyal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  The magnetic susceptibilities of iron deposits in thalassaemic spleen tissue.

Authors:  S Hackett; W Chua-anusorn; P Pootrakul; T G St Pierre
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2006-12-23

3.  Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field.

Authors:  Ludovic de Rochefort; Ryan Brown; Martin R Prince; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging.

Authors:  Ludovic de Rochefort; Tian Liu; Bryan Kressler; Jing Liu; Pascal Spincemaille; Vincent Lebon; Jianlin Wu; Yi Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  MR spectroscopy of the liver: principles and clinical applications.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.333

6.  Quantification of liver fat in the presence of iron and iodine: an ex-vivo dual-energy CT study.

Authors:  Michael A Fischer; Ralph Gnannt; Dimitri Raptis; Caecilia S Reiner; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Bernhard Schmidt; Sebastian Leschka; Hatem Alkadhi; Robert Goetti
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Iron overload alters glucose homeostasis, causes liver steatosis, and increases serum triacylglycerols in rats.

Authors:  Maísa Silva; Marcelo E Silva; Heberth de Paula; Cláudia Martins Carneiro; Maria Lucia Pedrosa
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 8.  HFE gene in primary and secondary hepatic iron overload.

Authors:  Giada Sebastiani; Ann-P Walker
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Non-invasive liver iron quantification by SQUID-biosusceptometry and serum ferritin iron as new diagnostic parameters in hereditary hemochromatosis.

Authors:  Peter Nielsen; Rainer Engelhardt; Jochen Düllmann; Roland Fischer
Journal:  Blood Cells Mol Dis       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Pathways underlying iron accumulation in human nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Authors:  Elmar Aigner; Igor Theurl; Milan Theurl; Dieter Lederer; Heike Haufe; Otto Dietze; Michael Strasser; Christian Datz; Guenter Weiss
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.045

View more
  4 in total

1.  Simultaneous hepatic iron and fat quantification with dual-energy CT in a rabbit model of coexisting iron and fat.

Authors:  Yun Peng; Jing Ye; Chang Liu; Hongru Jia; Jun Sun; Jun Ling; Martin Prince; Chang Li; Xianfu Luo
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

2.  Dual-energy computed tomography could reliably differentiate metastatic from non-metastatic lymph nodes of less than 0.5 cm in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Ying Zou; Meizhu Zheng; Ziyu Qi; Yu Guo; Xiaodong Ji; Lixiang Huang; Yan Gong; Xiudi Lu; Guolin Ma; Shuang Xia
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

3.  Fast kilovoltage (KV)-switching dual-energy computed tomography hydroxyapatite (HAP)-water decomposition technique for identifying bone marrow edema in vertebral compression fractures.

Authors:  Junhan Pan; Luyou Yan; Hui Gao; Yewen He; Zeya Zhong; Ping Li; Yaxi Zhang; Ying Guo; Liangying Liao; Shuwei Zhou; Kun Zhang
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2020-03

4.  Investigating Dual-Energy CT Post-Contrast Phases for Liver Iron Quantification: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Luca Basso; Dario Baldi; Lorenzo Mannelli; Carlo Cavaliere; Marco Salvatore; Valentina Brancato
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.658

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.