Literature DB >> 31141211

Coupling dynamics and evolutionary information with structure to identify protein regulatory and functional binding sites.

Sambit K Mishra1,2, Gaurav Kandoi1,3, Robert L Jernigan1,2.   

Abstract

Binding sites in proteins can be either specifically functional binding sites (active sites) that bind specific substrates with high affinity or regulatory binding sites (allosteric sites), that modulate the activity of functional binding sites through effector molecules. Owing to their significance in determining protein function, the identification of protein functional and regulatory binding sites is widely acknowledged as an important biological problem. In this work, we present a novel binding site prediction method, Active and Regulatory site Prediction (AR-Pred), which supplements protein geometry, evolutionary, and physicochemical features with information about protein dynamics to predict putative active and allosteric site residues. As the intrinsic dynamics of globular proteins plays an essential role in controlling binding events, we find it to be an important feature for the identification of protein binding sites. We train and validate our predictive models on multiple balanced training and validation sets with random forest machine learning and obtain an ensemble of discrete models for each prediction type. Our models for active site prediction yield a median area under the curve (AUC) of 91% and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) of 0.68, whereas the less well-defined allosteric sites are predicted at a lower level with a median AUC of 80% and MCC of 0.48. When tested on an independent set of proteins, our models for active site prediction show comparable performance to two existing methods and gains compared to two others, while the allosteric site models show gains when tested against three existing prediction methods. AR-Pred is available as a free downloadable package at https://github.com/sambitmishra0628/AR-PRED_source.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  active sites; allostery; coarse-graining; elastic network models; machine learning; proteins dynamics; regulatory sites

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31141211      PMCID: PMC6718341          DOI: 10.1002/prot.25749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  54 in total

Review 1.  A perspective on enzyme catalysis.

Authors:  Stephen J Benkovic; Sharon Hammes-Schiffer
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Protein elastic network models and the ranges of cooperativity.

Authors:  Lei Yang; Guang Song; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparisons of Protein Dynamics from Experimental Structure Ensembles, Molecular Dynamics Ensembles, and Coarse-Grained Elastic Network Models.

Authors:  Kannan Sankar; Sambit K Mishra; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 2.991

4.  Altered dynamics upon oligomerization corresponds to key functional sites.

Authors:  Sambit Kumar Mishra; Kannan Sankar; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2017-04-27

5.  The Role of Conformational Dynamics and Allostery in the Disease Development of Human Ferritin.

Authors:  Avishek Kumar; Tyler J Glembo; S Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Structural dynamics flexibility informs function and evolution at a proteome scale.

Authors:  Zeynep Nevin Gerek; Sudhir Kumar; Sefika Banu Ozkan
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  POOL server: machine learning application for functional site prediction in proteins.

Authors:  Srinivas Somarowthu; Mary Jo Ondrechen
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-06-01       Impact factor: 6.937

8.  Prediction of catalytic residues using Support Vector Machine with selected protein sequence and structural properties.

Authors:  Natalia V Petrova; Cathy H Wu
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-06-21       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Fpocket: an open source platform for ligand pocket detection.

Authors:  Vincent Le Guilloux; Peter Schmidtke; Pierre Tuffery
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Emerging Computational Methods for the Rational Discovery of Allosteric Drugs.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Wagner; Christopher T Lee; Jacob D Durrant; Robert D Malmstrom; Victoria A Feher; Rommie E Amaro
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 60.622

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Adaptability and specificity: how do proteins balance opposing needs to achieve function?

Authors:  Bentley Wingert; James Krieger; Hongchun Li; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  ScanNet: an interpretable geometric deep learning model for structure-based protein binding site prediction.

Authors:  Jérôme Tubiana; Dina Schneidman-Duhovny; Haim J Wolfson
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Modeling Electrostatic Force in Protein-Protein Recognition.

Authors:  H B Mihiri Shashikala; Arghya Chakravorty; Emil Alexov
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2019-09-25

Review 4.  Computational Methods for Predicting Functions at the mRNA Isoform Level.

Authors:  Sambit K Mishra; Viraj Muthye; Gaurav Kandoi
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Dissecting mutational allosteric effects in alkaline phosphatases associated with different Hypophosphatasia phenotypes: An integrative computational investigation.

Authors:  Fei Xiao; Ziyun Zhou; Xingyu Song; Mi Gan; Jie Long; Gennady Verkhivker; Guang Hu
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.