Literature DB >> 29376347

Comparisons of Protein Dynamics from Experimental Structure Ensembles, Molecular Dynamics Ensembles, and Coarse-Grained Elastic Network Models.

Kannan Sankar1,2, Sambit K Mishra1,2, Robert L Jernigan1,2.   

Abstract

Predicting protein motions is important for bridging the gap between protein structure and function. With growing numbers of structures of the same or closely related proteins becoming available, it is now possible to understand more about the intrinsic dynamics of a protein with principal component analysis (PCA) of the motions apparent within ensembles of experimental structures. In this paper, we compare the motions extracted from experimental ensembles of 50 different proteins with the modes of motion predicted by several types of coarse-grained elastic network models (ENMs) which additionally take into account more details of either the protein geometry or the amino acid specificity. We further compare the structural variations in the experimental ensembles with the motions sampled in molecular dynamics (MD) simulations for a smaller subset of 17 proteins with available trajectories. We find that the correlations between the motions extracted from MD trajectories and experimental structure ensembles are slightly different than those for the ENMs, possibly reflecting potential sampling biases. We find that there are small gains in the predictive power of the ENMs in reproducing motions present in either experimental or MD ensembles by accounting for the protein geometry rather than the amino acid specificity of the interactions.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29376347     DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b11668

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phys Chem B        ISSN: 1520-5207            Impact factor:   2.991


  10 in total

Review 1.  Advances in coarse-grained modeling of macromolecular complexes.

Authors:  Alexander J Pak; Gregory A Voth
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 6.809

2.  Coarse-grain simulations on NMR conformational ensembles highlight functional residues in proteins.

Authors:  Sophie Sacquin-Mora
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 3.  Adaptability and specificity: how do proteins balance opposing needs to achieve function?

Authors:  Bentley Wingert; James Krieger; Hongchun Li; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2020-10-11       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Modulation of Toroidal Proteins Dynamics in Favor of Functional Mechanisms upon Ligand Binding.

Authors:  Hongchun Li; Pemra Doruker; Guang Hu; Ivet Bahar
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Coupling dynamics and evolutionary information with structure to identify protein regulatory and functional binding sites.

Authors:  Sambit K Mishra; Gaurav Kandoi; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2019-06-22

6.  hdANM: a new comprehensive dynamics model for protein hinges.

Authors:  Pranav M Khade; Domenico Scaramozzino; Ambuj Kumar; Giuseppe Lacidogna; Alberto Carpinteri; Robert L Jernigan
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Probing the local conformational flexibility in receptor recognition: mechanistic insight from an atomic-scale investigation.

Authors:  Fei Ding; Wei Peng
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.036

8.  Prediction of methionine oxidation risk in monoclonal antibodies using a machine learning method.

Authors:  Kannan Sankar; Kam Hon Hoi; Yizhou Yin; Prasanna Ramachandran; Nisana Andersen; Amy Hilderbrand; Paul McDonald; Christoph Spiess; Qing Zhang
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 9.  Large-Scale Conformational Changes and Protein Function: Breaking the in silico Barrier.

Authors:  Laura Orellana
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2019-11-05

10.  Identification of native protein structures captured by principal interactions.

Authors:  Mehdi Mirzaie
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.