Literature DB >> 31135555

Is Implant Coating With Tyrosol- and Antibiotic-loaded Hydrogel Effective in Reducing Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes Biofilm Formation? A Preliminary In Vitro Study.

Konstantinos Tsikopoulos1, Alessandro Bidossi, Lorenzo Drago, Daniil R Petrenyov, Panagiotis Givissis, Dimitris Mavridis, Paraskevi Papaioannidou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have suggested that Cutibacterium acnes (formerly known as Propionibacterium) is the most frequently isolated pathogen after shoulder arthroplasty. To address the burden of periprosthetic joint infections associated with this pathogen, new prevention methods are needed. Tyrosol has a promising record of effectiveness in the field of biofilm-associated infections; however, to our knowledge, it has not been tested against C. acnes thus far. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: In this in vitro study, we asked: (1) Is tyrosol effective in inhibiting and eradicating C. acnes planktonic growth? (2) Is there synergy between tyrosol and rifampicin? (3) Is supplementation of hydrogel with tyrosol at the minimum inhibitory and subinhibitory concentrations efficacious in reducing free-floating C. acnes growth? (4) Is implant hydrogel coating (either alone or combined with tyrosol, rifampicin, or vancomycin) beneficial in reducing C. acnes biofilm formation? (5) Is the administration of soluble tyrosol an effective measure against C. acnes biofilm formation?
METHODS: We assessed C. acnes planktonic growth and eradication by inspecting visually the results of the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) assays. We also evaluated macroscopically the presence of synergy among tyrosol and rifampicin by means of the MIC checkerboard testing. Thereafter, we addressed colorimetrically the efficacy of tyrosol-loaded Defensive Antibacterial Coating (DAC®) hydrogel against the C. acnes free-floating form by means of the XTT cell proliferation reduction assay. Then, we explored photometrically the effect of hydrogel and soluble tyrosol at reducing C. acnes biofilm formation on titanium alloy disks that simulated orthopaedic implants by using the minimum biofilm inhibition concentration assay. In particular, 16 disks were sequentially allocated to each of the following testing conditions: (1) hydrogel alone; (2) tyrosol-loaded hydrogel; (3) rifampicin-supplemented hydrogel; (4) vancomycin-loaded hydrogel; and (5) soluble tyrosol. Subsequently, implants were sonicated and cell viability was evaluated in terms of the XTT assay.
RESULTS: Tyrosol was effective in inhibiting C. acnes planktonic (free-floating) growth demonstrating MIC values of 63 mM (9 mg/mL) and MBC values of 250 mM (35 mg/mL). Concerning synergy assessment, the checkerboard testing revealed additivity among tyrosol and rifampicin with a fractional inhibitory concentration index of 0.56. In addition, a hydrogel coating with tyrosol at the MIC showed no difference in the inhibition of free-floating C. Acnes form over control (median absorbance [MA] for tyrosol-supplemented hydrogel versus control groups were 0.21 [interquartile range {IQR}, 0.19-0.24] versus 0.26 [IQR, 0.23-0.31], p = 0.066). Furthermore, loaded hydrogel with tyrosol at 597 mg/mL (1 M) was no more effective than control in reducing C. acnes biofilm formation (MAs for tyrosol versus control were 0.12 [IQR, 0.11-0.13] versus 0.14 [IQR, 0.12-0.16], respectively; p = 0.076). This was also the case when we considered hydrogel in conjunction with vancomycin and rifampicin (MAs for vancomycin at 2% and 5% and rifampicin at 1% versus biofilm control were 0.139 [IQR, 0.133-0.143] and 0.141 [IQR, 0.133-0.143] and 0.135 [IQR, 0.128-0.146] versus 0.142 [IQR, 0.136-0.144], correspondingly). In contrast, soluble tyrosol at 597 mg/mL (1 M) inhibited biofilm formation compared to control (MAs for tyrosol and control groups were 0.11 [IQR, 0.09-0.13] versus 0.13 [IQR, 0.12-0.14], p = 0.007).
CONCLUSIONS: Although the implant coating with hydrogel (either pure or supplemented with antimicrobial agents) did not diminish C. acnes biofilm development in vitro, soluble tyrosol at 597 mg/mL (1 M) exceeded the meaningful biofilm inhibition threshold of 80%. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The results of the current preclinical investigation did not support the use of a fast, bioresorbable hydrogel as a coating method against C. acnes biofilms. Instead, direct local administration of soluble tyrosol at high concentrations should be further tested in future animal studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31135555      PMCID: PMC6999983          DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000663

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  57 in total

1.  Interim analyses and sequential designs in phase III studies.

Authors:  S Todd; A Whitehead; N Stallard; J Whitehead
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Propionibacterium acnes infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a diagnostic challenge.

Authors:  Christopher C Dodson; Edward V Craig; Frank A Cordasco; David M Dines; Joshua S Dines; Edward Dicarlo; Barry D Brause; Russell F Warren
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2009-11-01       Impact factor: 3.019

3.  Prevention of Propionibacterium acnes biofilm formation in prosthetic infections in vitro.

Authors:  Robert P Howlin; Christopher Winnard; Elizabeth M Angus; Connor J Frapwell; Jeremy S Webb; John J Cooper; Sean S Aiken; Julie Y Bishop; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  Outcomes in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infection after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Gregory N Nelson; Daniel E Davis; Surena Namdari
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Bacterial adherence to separated modular components in joint prosthesis: a clinical study.

Authors:  Enrique Gómez-Barrena; Jaime Esteban; Francisco Medel; Diana Molina-Manso; Alberto Ortiz-Pérez; Jose Cordero-Ampuero; José A Puértolas
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Exogenous tyrosol inhibits planktonic cells and biofilms of Candida species and enhances their susceptibility to antifungals.

Authors:  Rossana de A Cordeiro; Carlos E C Teixeira; Raimunda S N Brilhante; Débora S C M Castelo-Branco; Lucas P Alencar; Jonathas S de Oliveira; André J Monteiro; Tereza J P G Bandeira; José J C Sidrim; José Luciano Bezerra Moreira; Marcos F G Rocha
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Role of rifampin against Propionibacterium acnes biofilm in vitro and in an experimental foreign-body infection model.

Authors:  Ulrika Furustrand Tafin; Stéphane Corvec; Bertrand Betrisey; Werner Zimmerli; Andrej Trampuz
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Aryl rhodanines specifically inhibit staphylococcal and enterococcal biofilm formation.

Authors:  Timothy J Opperman; Steven M Kwasny; John D Williams; Atiyya R Khan; Norton P Peet; Donald T Moir; Terry L Bowlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-08-03       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Staphylococcus aureus attachment patterns on glass surfaces with nanoscale roughness.

Authors:  Natasa Mitik-Dineva; James Wang; Vi Khanh Truong; Paul Stoddart; Francois Malherbe; Russell J Crawford; Elena P Ivanova
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 2.188

10.  Delayed Propionibacterium acnes surgical site infections occur only in the presence of an implant.

Authors:  Yuta Shiono; Ken Ishii; Shigenori Nagai; Hiroaki Kakinuma; Aya Sasaki; Haruki Funao; Tetsuya Kuramoto; Kenji Yoshioka; Hiroko Ishihama; Norihiro Isogai; Kenichiro Takeshima; Takashi Tsuji; Yasunori Okada; Shigeo Koyasu; Masaya Nakamura; Yoshiaki Toyama; Mamoru Aizawa; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  2 in total

1.  CORR Insights®: Is Implant Coating With Tyrosol- and Antibiotic-loaded Hydrogel Effective in Reducing Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes Biofilm Formation? A Preliminary In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Antibacterial Activity in Iodine-coated Implants Under Conditions of Iodine Loss: Study in a Rat Model Plus In Vitro Analysis.

Authors:  Ken Ueoka; Tamon Kabata; Masaharu Tokoro; Yoshitomo Kajino; Daisuke Inoue; Tomoharu Takagi; Takaaki Ohmori; Junya Yoshitani; Takuro Ueno; Yuki Yamamuro; Atsushi Taninaka; Hiroyuki Tsuchiya
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.755

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.