Literature DB >> 22467526

Bacterial adherence to separated modular components in joint prosthesis: a clinical study.

Enrique Gómez-Barrena1, Jaime Esteban, Francisco Medel, Diana Molina-Manso, Alberto Ortiz-Pérez, Jose Cordero-Ampuero, José A Puértolas.   

Abstract

Bacterial adherence on total joint replacement implants may lead to biofilm formation and implant-related osteoarticular infection. It is unclear if different biomaterials in the prosthetic components are more prone to facilitate this bacterial adherence, although ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) component exchange in modular systems has been clinically utilized in the early management of these infections. To clarify if the amount of clinically adhered microorganisms was related to the material or the component, we investigated retrieved implants from infected joint replacements. Thirty-two patients were revised after confirmed implant-related infection through positive cultures. Eighty-seven total joint components (hip and knee) were obtained and separately sonicated following a previously published protocol. Cultures were quantified, and detected colony forming units (CFU) were adjusted according to the component surface and compared based on the component material and location. Variable adherence of bacteria to chrome cobalt alloys, UHMWPE, hydroxyapatite coated components, and titanium alloys. The commonest isolated organisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis (23 of 87 components) and Staphylococcus aureus (10 of 87). Twelve components did not show any microorganism adhered despite location in an infected joint, with positive cultures in other components. A mixed linear model adjusted for random effects (the random effect being the infected patient) obtained convergence for the CFU/mm(2) variable, but could not confirm a significantly higher adherence to a particular component or to a particular biomaterial. Therefore, the bacterial adherence primarily depends on the infective microorganism and the response of each individual patient, rather than materials or components.
Copyright © 2012 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22467526     DOI: 10.1002/jor.22114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  14 in total

1.  Is Implant Coating With Tyrosol- and Antibiotic-loaded Hydrogel Effective in Reducing Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) acnes Biofilm Formation? A Preliminary In Vitro Study.

Authors:  Konstantinos Tsikopoulos; Alessandro Bidossi; Lorenzo Drago; Daniil R Petrenyov; Panagiotis Givissis; Dimitris Mavridis; Paraskevi Papaioannidou
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Staphylococcal persistence due to biofilm formation in synovial fluid containing prophylactic cefazolin.

Authors:  Sana S Dastgheyb; Sommer Hammoud; Constantinos Ketonis; Andrew Yongkun Liu; Keith Fitzgerald; Javad Parvizi; James Purtill; Michael Ciccotti; Irving M Shapiro; Michael Otto; Noreen J Hickok
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Antibacterial and non-cytotoxic effect of nanocomposites based in polyethylene and copper nanoparticles.

Authors:  L A Tamayo; P A Zapata; F M Rabagliati; M I Azócar; L A Muñoz; X Zhou; G E Thompson; M A Páez
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.896

4.  Bacterial adherence to different components of total hip prosthesis in patients with prosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Richard Lass; Alexander Giurea; Bernd Kubista; Alexander M Hirschl; Wolfgang Graninger; Elisabeth Presterl; Reinhard Windhager; Johannes Holinka
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Antibacterial effect of antibiotic-loaded SBA-15 on biofilm formation by Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  Anna Aguilar-Colomer; Juan Carlos Doadrio; Concepción Pérez-Jorge; Miguel Manzano; Maria Vallet-Regí; Jaime Esteban
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 2.649

6.  Meta-analysis of sonication fluid samples from prosthetic components for diagnosis of infection after total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zanjing Zhai; Haowei Li; An Qin; Guangwang Liu; Xuqiang Liu; Chuanlong Wu; Huiwu Li; Zhenan Zhu; Xinhua Qu; Kerong Dai
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Tannic acid inhibits Staphylococcus aureus surface colonization in an IsaA-dependent manner.

Authors:  David E Payne; Nicholas R Martin; Katherine R Parzych; Alex H Rickard; Adam Underwood; Blaise R Boles
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2012-12-03       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 8.  Multi-disciplinary antimicrobial strategies for improving orthopaedic implants to prevent prosthetic joint infections in hip and knee.

Authors:  Matthew A Getzlaf; Eric A Lewallen; Hilal M Kremers; Dakota L Jones; Carolina A Bonin; Amel Dudakovic; Roman Thaler; Robert C Cohen; David G Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 9.  Biofilms in periprosthetic orthopedic infections.

Authors:  Stephen J McConoughey; Rob Howlin; Jeff F Granger; Maurice M Manring; Jason H Calhoun; Mark Shirtliff; Sandeep Kathju; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.165

Review 10.  Orthopedic Implant-Related Biofilm Pathophysiology: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Meletis Rozis; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; Spyros G Pneumaticos
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-06-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.