Literature DB >> 31134413

The value of the left atrial appendage orifice perimeter of 3D model based on 3D TEE data in the choice of device size of LAmbre™ occluder.

Dan Jia1, Qing Zhou2, Hong-Ning Song1, Lan Zhang1, Jin-Ling Chen1, Yu Liu3, Bin Kong3, Fa-Zhi He4, Yi-Jia Wang1, Yuan-Ting Yang1.   

Abstract

Preoperative optimal selection of the occluder size is crucial in percutaneous left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion, and the maximal width of the LAA orifice is the main reference index, however it can not fully meet the practical operation requirements. We retrospectively analyzed three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and computed tomography (CT) imaging dataset of the 41 patients who underwent LAA occlusion with LAmbre™ system. The LAA orifice parameters were overall evaluated to determine their role in device size selection. Eight LAA 3D models of the four cases who had been replaced their device during the procedure based on TEE and CT were printed out to verify the optimal parameter decision strategy. There was a significant concordance of the results between 3D TEE and CT in the LAA orifice evaluation. The correlations between the perimeter and maximal width measurements by 3D TEE and the closure disk of the device were stronger than that between the area measurements and the closure disk (r = 0.93, 0.95, 0.86, respectively and p < 0.001 all), and the result was similar to that by CT (r = 0.92, 0.93, 0.84, respectively and p < 0.001 all). The ratios of the maximal width to the minimal width of the four cases were all > 1.4, however the rest 37 cases were all ≤ 1.4. Based on the comprehensive assessment of the LAA orifice perimeter and maximal width of the 3D printed models, the experiments were all succeed just for one try. The LAA orifice perimeter of 3D printed model based on 3D TEE may help in choosing the optimal device size of LAmbre™, especially for the LAA with flater ostial shape.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Left atrial appendage closure; Orifice; Size; Three-dimensional model; Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31134413     DOI: 10.1007/s10554-019-01627-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging        ISSN: 1569-5794            Impact factor:   2.357


  23 in total

1.  Application of 3D printing technology to left atrial appendage occlusion.

Authors:  Huakang Li; Maoqin Shu; Xueqin Wang; Zhiyuan Song
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 4.164

2.  Printed MDCT 3D models for prediction of left atrial appendage (LAA) occluder device size: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Orly Goitein; Noam Fink; Victor Guetta; Roy Beinart; Yafim Brodov; Eli Konen; David Goitein; Elio Di Segni; Avishay Grupper; Michael Glikson
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 6.534

3.  Cardiac CT Angiography (CCTA) predicts left atrial appendage occluder device size and procedure outcome.

Authors:  Orly Goitein; Noam Fink; Ilan Hay; Elio Di Segni; Victor Guetta; David Goitein; Yafim Brodov; Eli Konen; Michael Glikson
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Application of 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Image Guidance to WATCHMAN Implantation and Impact on Early Operator Learning Curve: Single-Center Experience.

Authors:  Dee Dee Wang; Marvin Eng; Daniel Kupsky; Eric Myers; Michael Forbes; Mehnaz Rahman; Mohammad Zaidan; Sachin Parikh; Janet Wyman; Milan Pantelic; Thomas Song; Jeff Nadig; Patrick Karabon; Adam Greenbaum; William O'Neill
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 11.195

5.  CT based 3D printing is superior to transesophageal echocardiography for pre-procedure planning in left atrial appendage device closure.

Authors:  Edinrin Obasare; Sumeet K Mainigi; D Lynn Morris; Leandro Slipczuk; Igor Goykhman; Evan Friend; Mary Rodriguez Ziccardi; Gregg S Pressman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Left atrial appendage occlusion simulation based on three-dimensional printing: new insights into outcome and technique.

Authors:  Vlad Ciobotaru; Nicolas Combes; Claire A Martin; Eloi Marijon; Eric Maupas; Augustin Bortone; Eric Bruguière; Jean-Benoit Thambo; Emmanuel Teiger; Pénélope Pujadas-Berthault; Julien Ternacle; Xavier Iriart
Journal:  EuroIntervention       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 6.534

Review 7.  Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: procedural techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Jacqueline Saw; Mathieu Lempereur
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2014-11-17       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 8.  Left atrial appendage occlusion: 2016 in review.

Authors:  Manuel de J Ramos Ramirez; Bonnie Young; Kishore Harjai; Vernon Mascarenhas; Pugazhendhi Vijayaraman
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 9.  Cardiac 3D Printing and its Future Directions.

Authors:  Marija Vukicevic; Bobak Mosadegh; James K Min; Stephen H Little
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-02

10.  Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an update.

Authors:  O De Backer; S Arnous; N Ihlemann; N Vejlstrup; E Jørgensen; S Pehrson; T D W Krieger; P Meier; L Søndergaard; O W Franzen
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2014-06-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Pre-procedural determination of device size in left atrial appendage occlusion using three-dimensional cardiac computed tomography.

Authors:  Iksung Cho; William D Kim; Oh Hyun Lee; Min Jae Cha; Jiwon Seo; Chi Young Shim; Hui-Nam Pak; Boyoung Joung; Geu-Ru Hong; Heidi Gransar; Seung Yong Shin; Jung-Sun Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.