AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of simulation based on 3D-printed models before left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) for peri-device leaks (PDL) and the impact on procedural outcomes compared to conventional imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-six patients referred for LAAO with double disc device underwent construction of a 3D-printed LA model using flexible photopolymer resin. An implant simulation was performed retrospectively in Group 1 (55 patients), blinded to implanted device size, and prospectively in Group 2 (21 patients). In Group 1, an off-axis device position occurred in 14 patients (25%) and the incidence of PDL was 27% (15 patients); mismatch between model and device size was the best predictor (area under the curve 0.88, CI: 0.77-0.99). When using 3D simulation prospectively, mean prosthesis number per patient (1.05±0.21 vs. 1.20±0.52, p=0.04) and incidence of leaks (5% vs. 27%, p<0.01) were reduced compared to conventional imaging alone, as well as fluoroscopy time (19 mins [13.4-23] vs. 13.5 mins [11.1-15], p=0.012) and total fluoroscopy dose (7,291 [1,811-12,734] vs. 1,978 (1,548-4,800) mGy·cm2, p=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed patient-specific adaptive and flexible LA models improve LAAO double disc device sizing. This can potentially reduce procedure time and the number of prostheses employed per patient.
AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of simulation based on 3D-printed models before left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) for peri-device leaks (PDL) and the impact on procedural outcomes compared to conventional imaging. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-six patients referred for LAAO with double disc device underwent construction of a 3D-printed LA model using flexible photopolymer resin. An implant simulation was performed retrospectively in Group 1 (55 patients), blinded to implanted device size, and prospectively in Group 2 (21 patients). In Group 1, an off-axis device position occurred in 14 patients (25%) and the incidence of PDL was 27% (15 patients); mismatch between model and device size was the best predictor (area under the curve 0.88, CI: 0.77-0.99). When using 3D simulation prospectively, mean prosthesis number per patient (1.05±0.21 vs. 1.20±0.52, p=0.04) and incidence of leaks (5% vs. 27%, p<0.01) were reduced compared to conventional imaging alone, as well as fluoroscopy time (19 mins [13.4-23] vs. 13.5 mins [11.1-15], p=0.012) and total fluoroscopy dose (7,291 [1,811-12,734] vs. 1,978 (1,548-4,800) mGy·cm2, p=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: 3D-printed patient-specific adaptive and flexible LA models improve LAAO double disc device sizing. This can potentially reduce procedure time and the number of prostheses employed per patient.
Authors: Ramtin Gharleghi; Claire A Dessalles; Ronil Lal; Sinead McCraith; Kiran Sarathy; Nigel Jepson; James Otton; Abdul I Barakat; Susann Beier Journal: Ann Biomed Eng Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 3.934
Authors: William D Kim; Iksung Cho; Young Doo Kim; Min Jae Cha; Sang-Wook Kim; Young Choi; Seung Yong Shin Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2022-02-16