Literature DB >> 31128580

A Novel MRI Tool for Evaluating Cortical Bone Thickness of the Proximal Femur.

Austin J Ramme, Shaleen Vira, Alexandra Hotca, Rhiannon Miller, Arakua Welbeck, Stephen Honig, Kenneth A Egol, Chamith S Rajapakse, Gregory Chang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Osteoporotic hip fractures heavily cost the health care system. Clinicians and patients can benefit from improved tools to assess bone health. Herein, we aim to develop a three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) method to assess cortical bone thickness and assess the ability of the method to detect regional changes in the proximal femur.
METHODS: Eighty-nine patients underwent hip magnetic resonance imaging. FireVoxel and 3DSlicer were used to generate three-dimensional proximal femur models. ParaView was used to define five regions: head, neck, greater trochanter, intertrochanteric region, and subtrochanteric region. Custom software was used to calculate the cortical bone thickness and generate a color map of the proximal femur. Mean cortical thickness values for each region were calculated. Statistical t-tests were performed to evaluate differences in cortical thickness based on proximal femur region. Measurement reliability was evaluated using coefficient of variation, intraclass correlation coefficients, and overlap metrics.
RESULTS: Three-dimensional regional cortical thickness maps for all subjects were generated. The subtrochanteric region was found to have the thickest cortical bone and the femoral head had the thinnest cortical bone. There were statistically significant differences between regions (p < 0.01) for all possible comparisons.
CONCLUSIONS: Cortical bone is an important contributor to bone strength, and its thinning results in increased hip fracture risk. We describe the development and measurement reproducibility of an MRI tool permitting assessment of proximal femur cortical thickness. This study represents an important step toward longitudinal clinical trials interested in monitoring the effectiveness of drug therapy on proximal femur cortical thickness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31128580      PMCID: PMC7336874     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013)        ISSN: 2328-4633


  22 in total

1.  Measuring bone erosion and edema in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison of manual segmentation and RAMRIS methods.

Authors:  Angela R Crowley; Jing Dong; Alex McHaffie; Andrew W Clarke; Quentin Reeves; Megan Williams; Elizabeth Robinson; Nicola Dalbeth; Fiona M McQueen
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.813

2.  Automated segmentation of necrotic femoral head from 3D MR data.

Authors:  Reza A Zoroofi; Yoshinobu Sato; Takashi Nishii; Nobuhiko Sugano; Hideki Yoshikawa; Shinichi Tamura
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.790

3.  Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.

Authors:  Gregory Chang; Stephen Honig; Ryan Brown; Cem M Deniz; Kenneth A Egol; James S Babb; Ravinder R Regatte; Chamith S Rajapakse
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur.

Authors:  Roland Krug; S Banerjee; E T Han; D C Newitt; T M Link; S Majumdar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-07-06       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Validation of phalanx bone three-dimensional surface segmentation from computed tomography images using laser scanning.

Authors:  Nicole A DeVries; Esther E Gassman; Nicole A Kallemeyn; Kiran H Shivanna; Vincent A Magnotta; Nicole M Grosland
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2007-10-25       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability.

Authors:  P E Shrout; J L Fleiss
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

Authors:  Russel Burge; Bess Dawson-Hughes; Daniel H Solomon; John B Wong; Alison King; Anna Tosteson
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Volume measurement of bone erosions in magnetic resonance images of patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  P D Emond; D Inglis; A Choi; J Tricta; J D Adachi; C L Gordon
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-06-17       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Medical care expenditures and earnings losses among persons with arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in 2003, and comparisons with 1997.

Authors:  Edward Yelin; Louise Murphy; Miriam G Cisternas; Aimee J Foreman; David J Pasta; Charles G Helmick
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2007-05

10.  Quantitative 3D analysis of bone in hip osteoarthritis using clinical computed tomography.

Authors:  Tom D Turmezei; Graham M Treece; Andrew H Gee; Anastasia F Fotiadou; Kenneth E S Poole
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.315

View more
  1 in total

1.  Can magnetic resonance imaging accurately and reliably measure humeral cortical thickness?

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Garrett V Christensen; Hiroaki Ishikawa; Heath B Henninger; Eugene G Kholmovski; Megan Mills; Robert Z Tashjian
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-12-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.