| Literature DB >> 31127131 |
João Pimenta1,2,3,4,5, Alexandra M Lopes1,2, Angel Carracedo6,7, Miguel Arenas1,2,8,9, António Amorim1,2,4, David Comas10.
Abstract
The Iberian Peninsula is a well-delimited geographic region with a rich and complex human history. However, the causes of its genetic structure and past migratory dynamics are not yet fully understood. In order to shed light on them, here we evaluated the gene flow and genetic structure throughout the Iberian Peninsula with spatially explicit modelling applied to a georeferenced genetic dataset composed of genome-wide SNPs from 746 individuals belonging to 17 different regions of the Peninsula. We found contrasting patterns of genetic structure throughout Iberia. In particular, we identified strong patterns of genetic differentiation caused by relevant barriers to gene flow in northern regions and, on the other hand, a large genetic similarity in central and southern regions. In addition, our results showed a preferential north to south migratory dynamics and suggest a sex-biased dispersal in Mediterranean and southern regions. The estimated genetic patterns did not fit with the geographical relief of the Iberian landscape and they rather seem to follow political and linguistic territorial boundaries.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31127131 PMCID: PMC6534591 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-44121-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Location, sample size and references of the datasets analysed in the present study.
| Population | Sample size | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Basque Country, Spain | 57 |
[ |
| La Rioja | 10 |
[ |
| Navarre | 12 |
[ |
| Catalonia | 93 |
[ |
| Aragon | 24 |
[ |
| Valencia | 16 |
[ |
| Murcia | 13 |
[ |
| Andalusia | 68 |
[ |
| Extremadura | 14 |
[ |
| Castile La Mancha | 34 |
[ |
| Madrid | 2 |
[ |
| Castile and Leon | 36 |
[ |
| Cantabria | 10 |
[ |
| Asturias | 11 |
[ |
| Galicia | 177 |
[ |
| Porto | 124 |
[ |
| Lisbon | 45 |
[ |
|
| ||
| Finland (FIN) | 79 |
[ |
| Northern and Western Europeans from Utah (CEU) | 87 |
[ |
| Tuscany, Italy (TSI) | 96 |
[ |
| Basque Country, France | 24 |
[ |
|
| ||
| Morocco South | 16 |
[ |
| Morocco North | 18 |
[ |
| Algeria | 19 |
[ |
| Tunisia | 18 |
[ |
|
| ||
| Yoruba, Nigeria (YRI) | 101 |
[ |
Figure 1Geographic location of the 17 Iberian populations studied and population structure of the Iberian Peninsula. Geographic locations of the analysed data are shown above. The first and second principal components of the Iberian dataset are shown below.
Figure 2Geogenetic locations of the Iberian populations. The maps were inferred under (a) the model of isolation by distance with migration and (b) the model with migration and admixture estimated with SpaceMix. The plot shows the 95% confidence surfaces of the estimated geogenetic maps. Some names were abbreviated as Leon (Castile and Leon) and Mancha (Castile La Mancha).
Figure 3Effective Migration Maps estimated for the Iberian dataset. The maps were inferred from autosomes (a), X chromosome (b) and chromosome 7 (c). The plots were estimated with EEMS under a log10 scale and after mean centering. Blue regions indicate areas with effective migration rate higher than average (high genetic similarity), while brown colours indicate regions with a lower effective migration (compared to the average) between demes (high genetic differentiation).