| Literature DB >> 31121872 |
Majed Alrobaian1, Sana Al Azwari2, Amany Belal3,4, Hany A Eldeab5.
Abstract
Two series of novel 5-arylazo-3-cyano-2-(2″,3″,4″,6″-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-galacto pyranosyloxy)Entities:
Keywords: anticancer activity; antimicrobial; green chemistry; microwave synthesis; molecular docking; pyridine galactosides
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31121872 PMCID: PMC6572210 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24101969
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthetic pathways of 5-arylazo-3-cyano-2-(2″,3″,4″,6″-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-galactopyranosyloxo)-pyridines (8).
Scheme 2Synthesis of 3-Cyano-2-(2″,3″,4″,6″-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-galactopyranosyloxo)-pyridines (11). Reagents: (i) Pip., 4 h, 80 °C; (ii) 1″,2″,3″,4″,6″-penta-O-acetyl-α-d-galacto-pyranose, silica gel, MW (200 W, 2–3 min); (iii) hexamethyldisilazane, (NH4)2SO4, reflux, 48 h, N2, 2″,3″,4″,6″-tetra-O-acetyl-α-D-galactopyranosyl bromide (7); (iv) acetone/DMF, MW (200 W, 6–7 min), 1″,2″,3″,4″,6″-penta-O-acetyl-α-d-galactopyranose (6), dry MeCN, SnCl4, 0–25 °C; (v) TEA/MeOH; (vi) dry NH3/MeOH; (vii) TEA/MeOH.
Yield and reaction time comparison between microwave and conventional methods in the synthesis of 5-arylazo-3-cyano-2-(2″,3″,4″,6″-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-galactopyranosyloxo)-pyridines (8).
| Compound No. | R | Ar | Microwave Synthesis | Conventional Synthesis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reaction Time/min | Reaction Time/h | ||||
| Method A | Method B | Method C | |||
|
| CH3 | 4-ClC6H4 | 2 (92) | 5 (86) | 53 (50) |
|
| CH3 | 3-NO2C6H4 | 3 (90) | 5 (81) | 53 (49) |
|
| C6H5 | 4-ClC6H4 | 2 (95) | 4 (85) | 51 (44) |
|
| C6H5 | 3-NO2C6H4 | 2 (93) | 4 (83) | 51 (51) |
Yield and reaction time comparison between conventional and microwave-assisted synthesis of 3-Cyano-2-(2″,3″,4″,6″-tetra-O-acetyl-β-d-galactopyranosyloxo)-pyridines (11).
| Compound No. | R1 | R2 | Microwave Synthesis | Conventional Synthesis | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reaction Time/min | Reaction Time/h | ||||
| Method A | Method B | Method C | |||
|
| CH3 | CH3 | 3 (87) | 7 (80) | 62 (61) |
|
| C6H5 | CH3 | 2 (91) | 7 (83) | 67 (70) |
|
| C6H5 | CF3 | 2 (94) | 6 (85) | 65 (61) |
Yield comparison of triethylamine and ammonia methods for synthesis of deprotected galactosides (9).
| Comound No. | R | Ar | Method A | Method B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CH3 | 4-ClC6H4 | 90 | 83 |
|
| CH3 | 3-NO2C6H4 | 88 | 87 |
|
| C6H5 | 4-ClC6H4 | 87 | 83 |
|
| C6H5 | 3-NO2C6H4 | 89 | 80 |
Yield comparison of triethylamine and ammonia methods for synthesis of deprotected galactosides (14).
| Comound No. | R1 | R2 | Method A | Method B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CH3 | CH3 | 85 | 81 |
|
| C6H5 | CH3 | 87 | 81 |
|
| C6H5 | CF3 | 90 | 83 |
Figure 1Antimicrobial activity of the active synthesized compounds.
The docking scores and binding interactions of the docked compounds inside the DHFR active site.
| Compound No. | Docking Score | No. of H-Bonds | Amino Acid Residue | Interacting Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −21.86 | 2 | Met20 and Trp22 | 2 C=O |
|
| −19.91 | 3 | Gly15, Ser49, and Tyr100 | 3 OH |
|
| −19.09 | 3 | Ser49, Tre22, and Gly15 | 3 C=O |
|
| −19.59 | 3 | Trp22, Asp27, and lle94 | CN, 2OH |
|
| −19.54 | 6 | Gly15, lle94, Arg57, Lys32, and Arg52 | 2NH2 and 2 COO |
Figure 2(A) 2D interactions of compound 8 with the DHFR binding site. (B) 3D interactions of compound 8 with the DHFR binding site.
Figure 3(A) 2D interactions of compound 9 with the DHFR binding site. (B) 3D interactions of compound 9 with the DHFR binding site.
Figure 4(A) 2D interactions of compound 11 with the DHFR binding site. (B) 3D interactions of compound 11 with the DHFR binding site.
Figure 5(A) 2D interactions of compound 14 with the DHFR binding site. (B) 3D interactions of compound 14 with the DHFR binding site.
Figure 6(A) 2D interactions of methotrexate with the DHFR binding site. (B) 3D interactions of methotrexate with the DHFR binding site.