| Literature DB >> 31120904 |
Kerstin Matejka1,2,3,4,5, Ferdinand Stückler6, Michael Salomon7, Regina Ensenauer8,9,10, Eva Reischl11,12, Lena Hoerburger13, Harald Grallert3,4,5,11,12, Gabi Kastenmüller14, Annette Peters3,12,15, Hannelore Daniel2,16, Jan Krumsiek6,17, Fabian J Theis6,18, Hans Hauner1,2,3,4,5,19, Helmut Laumen1,2,3,4,5,13,20,21.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Genome-wide association studies of common diseases or metabolite quantitative traits often identify common variants of small effect size, which may contribute to phenotypes by modulation of gene expression. Thus, there is growing demand for cellular models enabling to assess the impact of gene regulatory variants with moderate effects on gene expression. Mitochondrial fatty acid oxidation is an important energy metabolism pathway. Common noncoding acyl-CoA dehydrogenase short chain (ACADS) gene variants are associated with plasma C4-acylcarnitine levels and allele-specific modulation of ACADS expression may contribute to the observed phenotype. METHODS ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31120904 PMCID: PMC6532850 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Phenotype of LCLs from donors of the KORA population cohort.
Analysis was performed on samples from three homozygous major T- and G-allele and five homozygous minor C- and A-allele carriers of the rs2014355T>C and rs1799958G>A (c.625G>A, p.G209S) variants. (A) Genotype-dependent C4-acylcarnitine levels in LCLs after 160 min incubation with 100 μmol/L oleic acid. Acylcarnitine levels were normalised to the citrate synthase activity. Values of 3–6 independent experiments (each in triplicates) for each of the eight analysed LCL are expressed as box plots (Boxes extend from first quartile to third quartile; median for each genotype is indicated as a horizontal line; whiskers are drawn equal to 1.5 times the interquartile distance). *** = p < 0.001; Mann-Whitney-U test. (B) mRNA samples were isolated in four independent experiments from each of the eight cell lines and analysed by RT-qPCR. The reference gene index (RGI) was calculated as arithmetic mean of GAPDH and YWHAZ in each LCL sample. Fold changes were calculated using the ΔΔCt method. (C) Protein samples were isolated in four independent experiments from each of the eight individual cell lines and western blot analysis of ACADS protein levels was carried out in 10 μg protein lysates of LCLs. Band intensities were analysed and quantified using the Odyssey IR Imaging System (LI-COR, Bioscience) and ACADS was normalised to GAPDH. Values are mean ± SD. * = p < 0.05; ** = p < 0.01; two-tailed, one-sample t-test. (D) Exemplarily western blot of one independent experiment analysing ACADS expression in the three major and five minor allele carriers.
Fig 2Phenotypes of the shACADS and shNTC knockdown Huh7 cells.
Doxycycline-induced knockdown of ACADS resulted in a long-term decrease of protein abundance and mRNA expression, and an intracellular accumulation of C4-acylcarnitine, which reflects the ACADS substrate C4-CoA. (A) RT-qPCR analysed mRNA of four independent experiments, shown as mean ± SD. (B, C) Western blot analysis of ACADS protein in shACADS and shNTC knockdown Huh7 cell lysates. Western blotting analysed 10 μg of cell lysate per sample depicted exemplary for one (C) of four experiments (B). ** = p < 0.01 (one sample t-test). mRNA (A) and Protein (B) were harvested after 3 or 5 days of treatment with 0, 5, and 10 ng/mL doxycycline, respectively. *** = p < 0.001 (one-sample t-test). (D) Intracellular C4-acylcarnitine measurement in stably transduced Huh7 cells. Values of four independent experiments are expressed as mean ± SD. * = p< 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s post hoc test). NTC = non-target control.
Fig 3Time-course of intracellular acylcarnitine levels in ACADS knockdown cells—comparison of distinct time-points and kinetic differences.
(A) Intracellular acylcarnitine levels, representing acyl-CoAs with corresponding chain length, were extracted and measured before palmitic acid loading and 7, 14, 21 and 28 min after loading in shACADS knockdown Huh7 cells, i.e. shACADSnull and shACADSmax cells treated with 0 and 10 ng/ml doxycycline (dox), respectively, for shRNA induction. Shown are levels of C4-acylcarnitine as primary outcome, C14-, C6-acylcarnitines representing long- and medium-chain acylcarnitines, and C16-acylcarnitine (note that data for acylcarnitines C2 to C16, including the here presented, are given in S2 Fig). Values of four independent experiments are shown as mean ± SD (original data of single measurements are given in S1A Table). Time point specific comparison between shACADSnull and shACADSmax, were performed using t-tests; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01. Results for all acylcarnitines in S2 and S3 Figs for cells treated with shACADS and shNTC, respectively. (B) Results from fitting of linear FAO model to the measured data (note that data for acylcarnitines C2 to C16 are given in S2 Fig). (C) FAO model based quantification of differences in acylcarnitine flux. shACADSnull and shACADSmax are compared by the ratio α = kshACADSmax / kshACADSnull, reaction rates k are derived from the FAO model fits. α-values from best model fits are represented as dots with respective 95% confidence intervals. (B+C) # indicates significant difference (p < 0.05) between reaction rate kshACADSmax and kshACADSnull of the respective knockdown experiments. For details of dynamical modelling, see materials and methods, S4–S6 Figs and S1 Text.
Fig 4Time courses of extracellular C4-acylcarnitine after palmitic acid loading.
Palmitic acid was added to induce FAO in shACADS and shNTC Huh7 cells. C4-acylcarnitine, which accumulates within the cell due to the ACADS knockdown, also accumulates in the supernatant. Gradual expression of shRNA was induced using 0, 5 and 10 ng/mL doxycycline. C4 was measured in supernatants before palmitic acid loading and after 7, 14, 21 and 28 min. Values of four independent experiments are expressed as mean ± SD. (original data of single measurements are given in S1C and S1D Table). **: p < 0.01, *: p < 0.05 comparison between shACADS dox 0 ng/mL and shACADS dox 10 ng/mL (two-sample t-test).