Literature DB >> 31120779

Machine Learning Prediction of Liver Stiffness Using Clinical and T2-Weighted MRI Radiomic Data.

Lili He1,2,3, Hailong Li1,2, Jonathan A Dudley2,4, Thomas C Maloney2,4, Samuel L Brady4,5, Elanchezhian Somasundaram4, Andrew T Trout4,5, Jonathan R Dillman2,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to develop a machine learning model to categorically classify MR elastography (MRE)-derived liver stiffness using clinical and nonelastographic MRI radiomic features in pediatric and young adult patients with known or suspected liver disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Clinical data (27 demographic, anthropomorphic, medical history, and laboratory features), MRI presence of liver fat and chemical shift-encoded fat fraction, and MRE mean liver stiffness measurements were retrieved from electronic medical records. MRI radiomic data (105 features) were extracted from T2-weighted fast spin-echo images. Patients were categorized by mean liver stiffness (< 3 vs ≥ 3 kPa). Support vector machine (SVM) models were used to perform two-class classification using clinical features, radiomic features, and both clinical and radiomic features. Our proposed model was internally evaluated in 225 patients (mean age, 14.1 years) and externally evaluated in an independent cohort of 84 patients (mean age, 13.7 years). Diagnostic performance was assessed using ROC AUC values. RESULTS. In our internal cross-validation model, the combination of clinical and radiomic features produced the best performance (AUC = 0.84), compared with clinical (AUC = 0.77) or radiomic (AUC = 0.70) features alone. Using both clinical and radiomic features, the SVM model was able to correctly classify patients with accuracy of 81.8%, sensitivity of 72.2%, and specificity of 87.0%. In our external validation experiment, this SVM model achieved an accuracy of 75.0%, sensitivity of 63.6%, specificity of 82.4%, and AUC of 0.80. CONCLUSION. An SVM learning model incorporating clinical and T2-weighted radiomic features has fair-to-good diagnostic performance for categorically classifying liver stiffness.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; artificial intelligence; elastography; liver; machine learning

Year:  2019        PMID: 31120779     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.19.21082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  14 in total

1.  Numerical simulation of wave propagation through interfaces using the extended finite element method for magnetic resonance elastography.

Authors:  Quanshangze Du; Aline Bel-Brunon; Simon Auguste Lambert; Nahiène Hamila
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 2.482

2.  Usefulness of Noncontrast MRI-Based Radiomics Combined Clinic Biomarkers in Stratification of Liver Fibrosis.

Authors:  Ru Zhao; Hong Zhao; Ya-Qiong Ge; Fang-Fang Zhou; Long-Sheng Wang; Hong-Zhen Yu; Xi-Jun Gong
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 3.  Conventional and artificial intelligence-based imaging for biomarker discovery in chronic liver disease.

Authors:  Jérémy Dana; Aïna Venkatasamy; Antonio Saviano; Joachim Lupberger; Yujin Hoshida; Valérie Vilgrain; Pierre Nahon; Caroline Reinhold; Benoit Gallix; Thomas F Baumert
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 9.029

Review 4.  The digital transformation of hepatology: The patient is logged in.

Authors:  Tiffany Wu; Douglas A Simonetto; John D Halamka; Vijay H Shah
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 17.298

5.  DeepLiverNet: a deep transfer learning model for classifying liver stiffness using clinical and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data in children and young adults.

Authors:  Hailong Li; Lili He; Jonathan A Dudley; Thomas C Maloney; Elanchezhian Somasundaram; Samuel L Brady; Nehal A Parikh; Jonathan R Dillman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2020-10-13

6.  Deep Learning Prediction of Voxel-Level Liver Stiffness in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Authors:  Brian L Pollack; Kayhan Batmanghelich; Stephen S Cai; Emile Gordon; Stephen Wallace; Roberta Catania; Carlos Morillo-Hernandez; Alessandro Furlan; Amir A Borhani
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-09-29

Review 7.  Current and emerging artificial intelligence applications for pediatric abdominal imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan R Dillman; Elan Somasundaram; Samuel L Brady; Lili He
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-04-12

8.  MRI-based radiomic feature analysis of end-stage liver disease for severity stratification.

Authors:  Jennifer Nitsch; Jordan Sack; Michael W Halle; Jan H Moltz; April Wall; Anna E Rutherford; Ron Kikinis; Hans Meine
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  An imageomics and multi-network based deep learning model for risk assessment of liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer.

Authors:  Tiancheng He; Joy Nolte Fong; Linda W Moore; Chika F Ezeana; David Victor; Mukul Divatia; Matthew Vasquez; R Mark Ghobrial; Stephen T C Wong
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 10.  Noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis: review of current quantitative CT and MRI-based techniques.

Authors:  Won Hyeong Im; Ji Soo Song; Weon Jang
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-07-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.