Literature DB >> 31119509

Use of Consumer Protection Tools on Internet Gambling Sites: Customer Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers to Use.

Sally M Gainsbury1, Douglas J Angus2, Lindsey Procter2, Alex Blaszczynski2.   

Abstract

Internet gambling has been widely legalised in recognition of its capacity to, and the importance of, providing consumer protection tools to prevent and minimise gambling-related harms. Most licensed Internet gambling sites are required to provide consumer protection tools, including activity statements, deposit limits, and time-outs (temporary self-exclusion). However, few Internet gambling customers engage with the tools. An online survey of 564 customers of Australian Internet gambling sites aimed to understand the extent to which consumer protection tools are used, characteristics of those using these tools, and the perceptions and attitudes towards tool use, including barriers to use. Most participants were aware of the tools and had accessed activity statements; few had used deposit limits (24.5%) or time-outs (8.1%) but use of these restrictive tools was higher among those at-risk of gambling problems. Satisfaction with tools was generally high among users and tools were mostly used as intended; however, only moderate changes in behaviour were reported. Participants predominately did not use the restrictive tools as they did not see these as relevant for them, and they were perceived to be intended for people with gambling problems. The findings are important to drive necessary improvements to consumer protection efforts including efforts to encourage perception that tools are relevant for all customers. Changes to current practice, including terminology and promotion of tools, are needed by Internet gambling operators and policy makers to improve the utilisation and effectiveness of consumer protection tools to enable sustainable gambling among the broader cohort of Internet gamblers.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Harm minimisation; Online gambling; Prevention; Responsible gambling; Self-exclusion; Voluntary pre-commitment

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31119509     DOI: 10.1007/s10899-019-09859-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gambl Stud        ISSN: 1050-5350


  25 in total

1.  Usage of a Responsible Gambling Tool: A Descriptive Analysis and Latent Class Analysis of User Behavior.

Authors:  David Forsström; Hugo Hesser; Per Carlbring
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2016-09

2.  Risk of harm among gamblers in the general population as a function of level of participation in gambling activities.

Authors:  Shawn R Currie; David C Hodgins; JianLi Wang; Nady el-Guebaly; Harold Wynne; Sophie Chen
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 6.526

3.  Real limits in the virtual world: self-limiting behavior of Internet gamblers.

Authors:  Sarah E Nelson; Debi A LaPlante; Allyson J Peller; Anja Schumann; Richard A LaBrie; Howard J Shaffer
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2008-08-12

4.  Breadth and depth involvement: Understanding Internet gambling involvement and its relationship to gambling problems.

Authors:  Debi A LaPlante; Sarah E Nelson; Heather M Gray
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2013-08-05

5.  Understanding Positive Play: An Exploration of Playing Experiences and Responsible Gambling Practices.

Authors:  Richard T A Wood; Mark D Griffiths
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-12

Review 6.  Nudging and Boosting: Steering or Empowering Good Decisions.

Authors:  Ralph Hertwig; Till Grüne-Yanoff
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-08-09

7.  Social responsibility tools in online gambling: a survey of attitudes and behavior among Internet gamblers.

Authors:  Mark D Griffiths; Richard T A Wood; Jonathan Parke
Journal:  Cyberpsychol Behav       Date:  2009-08

8.  Greater involvement and diversity of Internet gambling as a risk factor for problem gambling.

Authors:  Sally M Gainsbury; Alex Russell; Alex Blaszczynski; Nerilee Hing
Journal:  Eur J Public Health       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.367

9.  Personalized Behavioral Feedback for Online Gamblers: A Real World Empirical Study.

Authors:  Michael M Auer; Mark D Griffiths
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-11-28

10.  Online Gambling among Treatment-Seeking Patients in Singapore: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Melvyn Zhang; Yi Yang; Song Guo; Chris Cheok; Kim Eng Wong; Gomathinayagam Kandasami
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.390

View more
  9 in total

1.  "It started 30 years ago, and it still haunts me": an exploratory investigation of Territorians' gambling behaviours, harm, and help-seeking for gambling issues in an Australian jurisdiction.

Authors:  Himanshu Gupta; Matthew Stevens
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  Perspective of Internet Poker Players on Harm-Reduction Strategies: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Patrycja Michalska; Anne Chatton; Louise Penzenstadler; Paweł Izdebski; Emilien Jeannot; Olivier Simon; Magali Dufour; Lucien Rochat; Suzanne Lischer; Yasser Khazaal
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Online self-exclusion from multiple gambling venues: Stakeholder co-design of a usable and acceptable self-directed website.

Authors:  D Pickering; A Serafimovska; S J Cho; A Blaszczynski; S M Gainsbury
Journal:  Internet Interv       Date:  2021-12-18

4.  Analyzing Consumer Protection for Gamblers Across Different Online Gambling Operators: A Replication Study.

Authors:  Maris Catania; Mark D Griffiths
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Addict       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 11.555

5.  How structural changes in online gambling are shaping the contemporary experiences and behaviours of online gamblers: an interview study.

Authors:  Nerilee Hing; Michele Smith; Matthew Rockloff; Hannah Thorne; Alex M T Russell; Nicki A Dowling; Helen Breen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 4.135

6.  Predicting self-exclusion among online gamblers: An empirical real-world study.

Authors:  Niklas Hopfgartner; Michael Auer; Mark D Griffiths; Denis Helic
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2022-08-10

7.  Gamblers' use of measures to prevent gambling problems and reduce harm.

Authors:  Jonny Engebø; Torbjørn Torsheim; Ståle Pallesen
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 5.435

8.  Who chooses to enroll in a new national gambling self-exclusion system? A general population survey in Sweden.

Authors:  A Håkansson; V Henzel
Journal:  Harm Reduct J       Date:  2020-10-21

9.  Gamblers' Perception of the Playscan Risk Assessment: A Mixed-Methods Study.

Authors:  David Forsström; Alexander Rozental; Emma Wiklund; Per Carlbring; Philip Lindner
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2021-06-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.