Literature DB >> 3111938

The effects of chromosomal rearrangements on the zeste-white interaction in Drosophila melanogaster.

S M Smolik-Utlaut, W M Gelbart.   

Abstract

Three gene systems have been shown to exhibit proximity-dependent phenotypes in Drosophila melanogaster: bithorax (BX-C), decapentaplegic (DPP-C) and white (w). In structurally homozygous genotypes, specific allelic combinations at these loci exhibit one phenotype, while in certain rearrangement heterozygotes the same allelic combinations exhibit dramatically different phenotypes. These observations have led to the suggestion that, through the process of somatic chromosome pairing, such loci are brought into sufficient proximity to permit effective passage of molecular information between homologues; rearrangement heterozygosity would then displace the homologues relative to one another such that this trans-communication is obviated. The genetic properties of the proximity-dependent allelic complementation (termed transvection effects) at the BX-C and DPP-C, are quite similar. Chromosomal rearrangements which disrupt transvection possess a breakpoint in a particular segment of the chromosome arm bearing the transvection-sensitive gene (arm 2L for the DDP-C and 3R for the BX-C); this segment of each arm has been termed the critical region by Lewis (1954). As determined by cytogenetic analysis of transvection-disrupting rearrangements, the critical regions for the BX-C and DDP-C transvection effects extend proximally from these loci for several hundred polytene chromosome bands (Lewis 1954; Gelbart 1982). The interaction between the zeste and white loci appears to depend upon the proximity of the two w+ alleles. By use of insertional duplications, displacement of w+ homologues has been shown to interfere with the zeste-white interaction. In contrast to transvection at bithorax and decapentaplegic, however, only breakpoints in the immediate vicinity of the white locus can disrupt the zeste-white interaction (Gans 1953; Green 1967; Gelbart 1971; this report). In this report, we investigate the basis for the difference in the size of the BX-C and DPP-C critical regions from that of white. We test and eliminate the possibility that the difference is due to the presence near the white locus of a site which mediates somatic chromosome pairing. Rather, our evidence strongly suggests that the zeste-white interaction is, at the phenotypic level, much less sensitive to displacement of the homologous genes than is transvection at either the BX-C or DPP-C. We also show that many of the breakpoints in the vicinity of the white locus do not behave as if they are disrupting a critical region for somatic chromosome pairing. Given these results, we suggest that the zeste-white interaction and transvection are two different proximity-dependent phenomena.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3111938      PMCID: PMC1203139     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  7 in total

1.  Allelic pairing and gene regulation: A model for the zeste-white interaction in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J W Jack; B H Judd
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genetic and physical studies of a portion of the white locus participating in transcriptional regulation and in synapsis-dependent interactions in Drosophila adult tissues.

Authors:  D Davison; C H Chapman; C Wedeen; P M Bingham
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Three-dimensional architecture of a polytene nucleus.

Authors:  D A Agard; J W Sedat
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983-04-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Synapsis-dependent allelic complementation at the decapentaplegic gene complex in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W M Gelbart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Transformation of white locus DNA in drosophila: dosage compensation, zeste interaction, and position effects.

Authors:  T Hazelrigg; R Levis; G M Rubin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1984-02       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Decapentaplegic: a gene complex affecting morphogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  F A Spencer; F M Hoffmann; W M Gelbart
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Multiple upstream regulatory elements control the expression of the Drosophila white gene.

Authors:  V Pirrotta; H Steller; M P Bozzetti
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1985-12-16       Impact factor: 11.598

  7 in total
  20 in total

1.  Enhancer action in trans is permitted throughout the Drosophila genome.

Authors:  Ji-Long Chen; Kathryn L Huisinga; Michaela M Viering; Sharon A Ou; C-ting Wu; Pamela K Geyer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Paramutation in maize.

Authors:  V L Chandler; W B Eggleston; J E Dorweiler
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.076

3.  A novel transvection phenomenon affecting the white gene of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Gubb; M Ashburner; J Roote; T Davis
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  An unusual genomic position effect on Drosophila white gene expression: pairing dependence, interactions with zeste, and molecular analysis of revertants.

Authors:  T Hazelrigg; S Petersen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Effects of chromosomal rearrangements on transvection at the yellow gene of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Sharon A Ou; Elaine Chang; Szexian Lee; Katherine So; C-ting Wu; James R Morris
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-08-10       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Genetic analysis of the enhancer of zeste locus and its role in gene regulation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  R S Jones; W M Gelbart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Topological constraints on transvection between white genes within the transposing element TE35B in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Gubb; J Roote; J Trenear; D Coulson; M Ashburner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Trans-inactivation of the Drosophila brown gene: evidence for transcriptional repression and somatic pairing dependence.

Authors:  S Henikoff; T D Dreesen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The mcp element from the Drosophila melanogaster bithorax complex mediates long-distance regulatory interactions.

Authors:  M Muller; K Hagstrom; H Gyurkovics; V Pirrotta; P Schedl
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Drawing a stripe in Drosophila imaginal disks: negative regulation of decapentaplegic and patched expression by engrailed.

Authors:  M Sanicola; J Sekelsky; S Elson; W M Gelbart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.