Literature DB >> 31116661

Muscle length and joint angle influence spinal but not corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii across forearm postures.

Davis A Forman1, Daniel Abdel-Malek2, Christopher M F Bunce2, Michael W R Holmes3.   

Abstract

Forearm rotation (supination/pronation) alters corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii, but it is unclear whether corticospinal excitability is influenced by joint angle, muscle length, or both. Thus the purpose of this study was to separately examine elbow joint angle and muscle length on corticospinal excitability. Corticospinal excitability to the biceps and triceps brachii was measured using motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited via transcranial magnetic stimulation. Spinal excitability was measured using cervicomedullary motor evoked potentials (CMEPs) elicited via transmastoid electrical stimulation. Elbow angles were manipulated with a fixed biceps brachii muscle length (and vice versa) across five unique postures: 1) forearm neutral, elbow flexion 90°; 2) forearm supinated, elbow flexion 90°; 3) forearm pronated, elbow flexion 90°; 4) forearm supinated, elbow flexion 78°; and 5) forearm pronated, elbow flexion 113°. A musculoskeletal model determined biceps brachii muscle length for postures 1-3, and elbow joint angles (postures 4-5) were selected to maintain biceps length across forearm orientations. MEPs and CMEPs were elicited at rest and during an isometric contraction of 10% of maximal biceps muscle activity. At rest, MEP amplitudes to the biceps were largest during supination, which was independent of elbow joint angle. CMEP amplitudes were not different when the elbow was fixed at 90° but were largest in pronation when muscle length was controlled. During an isometric contraction, there were no significant differences across forearm postures for either MEP or CMEP amplitudes. These results highlight that elbow joint angle and biceps brachii muscle length can each independently influence spinal excitability. NEW & NOTEWORTHY Changes in upper limb posture can influence the responsiveness of the central nervous system to artificial stimulations. We established a novel approach integrating neurophysiology techniques with biomechanical modeling. Through this approach, the effects of elbow joint angle and biceps brachii muscle length on corticospinal and spinal excitability were assessed. We demonstrate that spinal excitability is uniquely influenced by joint angle and muscle length, and this highlights the importance of accounting for muscle length in neurophysiological studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biceps brachii; forearm posture; joint angle; muscle length; spinal excitability

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31116661      PMCID: PMC6689784          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00620.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  43 in total

1.  Integrative pattern of Ia synaptic actions on motoneurones of hip and knee muscles.

Authors:  R M ECCLES; A LUNDBERG
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1958-12-04       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Changes in corticomotor excitability of hand muscles in relation to static shoulder positions.

Authors:  F Ginanneschi; F Del Santo; F Dominici; F Gelli; R Mazzocchio; A Rossi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-10-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cortico-motoneuronal output to intrinsic hand muscles is differentially influenced by static changes in shoulder positions.

Authors:  F Dominici; T Popa; F Ginanneschi; R Mazzocchio; A Rossi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-05-10       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Cutaneous afferents provide a neuronal population vector that encodes the orientation of human ankle movements.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Aimonetti; Valérie Hospod; Jean-Pierre Roll; Edith Ribot-Ciscar
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Modulation of excitability in the cerebral cortex projecting to upper extremity muscles by rotational positioning of the forearm.

Authors:  Kosei Mitsuhashi; Kazunori Seki; Chizuru Akamatsu; Yasunobu Handa
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  [Disynaptic reflex link between muscles of a myotatic unit].

Authors:  D P C LLOYD; Y LAPORTE
Journal:  J Physiol (Paris)       Date:  1951

7.  Differences in corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii between arm cycling and tonic contraction are not evident at the immediate onset of movement.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Devin T G Philpott; Duane C Button; Kevin E Power
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A spinal pathway between synergists can modulate activity in human elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  Benjamin K Barry; Zachary A Riley; Michael A Pascoe; Roger M Enoka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on spinal network excitability in humans.

Authors:  N Roche; A Lackmy; V Achache; B Bussel; R Katz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2009-10-05       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Voluntary activation and twitch potentiation of the elbow flexors across supinated, neutral, and pronated forearm orientations.

Authors:  Sienna Kohn; Rowan R Smart; Jennifer M Jakobi
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2018-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.