Literature DB >> 19805746

Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on spinal network excitability in humans.

N Roche1, A Lackmy, V Achache, B Bussel, R Katz.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) when applied over the motor cortex, modulates excitability dependent on the current polarity. The impact of this cortical modulation on spinal cord network excitability has rarely been studied. In this series of experiments, performed in healthy subjects, we show that anodal tDCS increases disynaptic inhibition directed from extensor carpi radialis (ECR) to flexor carpi radialis (FCR) with no modification of presynaptic inhibition of FCR Ia terminals and FCR H-reflex recruitment curves. We also show that cathodal tDCS does not modify spinal network excitability. Our results suggest that the increase of disynaptic inhibition observed during anodal tDCS relies on an increase of disynaptic interneuron excitability and that tDCS over the motor cortex in human subjects induces effects on spinal network excitability. Our results highlight the fact that the effects of tDCS should be considered in regard to spinal motor circuits and not only to cortical circuits.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19805746      PMCID: PMC2805376          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2009.177550

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  33 in total

1.  Modulation of spinal cord excitability by subthreshold repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex in humans.

Authors:  A Valero-Cabré; M Oliveri; M Gangitano; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Level of action of cathodal DC polarisation induced inhibition of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Maren S Nitsche; Cornelia C Klein; Frithjof Tergau; John C Rothwell; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.

Authors:  N Lang; M A Nitsche; W Paulus; J C Rothwell; R N Lemon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-01-24       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Hartwig R Siebner; Nicolas Lang; Vincenzo Rizzo; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Roger N Lemon; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-03-31       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The effect of percutaneous motor cortex stimulation on H reflexes in muscles of the arm and leg in intact man.

Authors:  J M Cowan; B L Day; C Marsden; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Assessing changes in presynaptic inhibition of I a fibres: a study in man and the cat.

Authors:  H Hultborn; S Meunier; C Morin; E Pierrot-Deseilligny
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Reciprocal group I inhibition on triceps surae motoneurons in man.

Authors:  Y Mizuno; R Tanaka; N Yanagisawa
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Exteroceptive influences on lower limb motoneurons in man: spinal and supraspinal contributions.

Authors:  P J Delwaide; P Crenna
Journal:  Adv Neurol       Date:  1983

9.  Reciprocal inhibition between the muscles of the human forearm.

Authors:  B L Day; C D Marsden; J A Obeso; J C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Pharmacological modulation of cortical excitability shifts induced by transcranial direct current stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; K Fricke; U Henschke; A Schlitterlau; D Liebetanz; N Lang; S Henning; F Tergau; W Paulus
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-08-29       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  17 in total

1.  Paired associative stimulation induces change in presynaptic inhibition of Ia terminals in wrist flexors in humans.

Authors:  Jean-Charles Lamy; Heike Russmann; Ejaz A Shamim; Sabine Meunier; Mark Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the leg motor area on lumbar spinal network excitability in healthy subjects.

Authors:  N Roche; A Lackmy; V Achache; B Bussel; R Katz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Beyond the target area: remote effects of non-invasive brain stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Muscle length and joint angle influence spinal but not corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii across forearm postures.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Daniel Abdel-Malek; Christopher M F Bunce; Michael W R Holmes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation does not influence the neural adjustments associated with fatiguing contractions in a hand muscle.

Authors:  Achraf Abdelmoula; Stéphane Baudry; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Enhanced locomotor adaptation aftereffect in the "broken escalator" phenomenon using anodal tDCS.

Authors:  D Kaski; S Quadir; M Patel; N Yousif; A M Bronstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on the psychomotor, cognitive, and motor performances of power athletes.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Yohan Grandperrin; Magali Nicolier; Philippe Gimenez; Chrystelle Vidal; Gregory Tio; Emmanuel Haffen; Djamila Bennabi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Polarity specific effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on interhemispheric inhibition.

Authors:  Toshiki Tazoe; Takashi Endoh; Taku Kitamura; Toru Ogata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations.

Authors:  Archy O de Berker; Marom Bikson; Sven Bestmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 10.  Studying the effects of transcranial direct-current stimulation in stroke recovery using magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Charlotte J Stagg; Heidi Johansen-Berg
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.