Literature DB >> 17592209

Modulation of excitability in the cerebral cortex projecting to upper extremity muscles by rotational positioning of the forearm.

Kosei Mitsuhashi1, Kazunori Seki, Chizuru Akamatsu, Yasunobu Handa.   

Abstract

The forearm rotation changes sensory inputs to the central nervous system, thereby providing orientation of the hand for grasping an object. Electrical activities of the muscles, induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation to the brain, i.e., motor evoked potentials (MEPs), are used for estimation of the excitability of motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord. It is well known that rotational positioning of the forearm influences MEPs of forearm muscles through modulation of excitability in the central nervous system. In the present study, we investigated whether such a posture-dependent change of MEPs could be found in upper arm and intrinsic hand muscles at three different rotational forearm positions: the most internal (pronation), neutral, and most external (supination) positions of rotation. MEPs were simultaneously recorded from the four muscles, biceps brachii (BB), triceps brachii (TB), abductor digiti minimi (ADM), and abductor pollicis brevis (AbPB). MEP amplitudes and latencies in BB, TB and ADM were significantly larger and shorter, respectively, in supination compared to the values in other positions. By contrast, MEP of AbPB in supination was lower in amplitude and longer in latency. Importantly, muscle lengths of TB, ADM and AbPB are constant in any rotational forearm positions, excluding the possibility of the muscle-length dependent change of spinal reflex. Therefore, these results might be attributable to the posture-dependent modulation of the motor cortex activity for the upper limb. The motor cortex probably changes the control strategy for the upper limb muscles in accordance with the sensory input from the forearm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17592209     DOI: 10.1620/tjem.212.221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med        ISSN: 0040-8727            Impact factor:   1.848


  7 in total

1.  Contributions of altered stretch reflex coordination to arm impairments following stroke.

Authors:  Randy D Trumbower; Vengateswaran J Ravichandran; Matthew A Krutky; Eric J Perreault
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effect of movement-related pain on behaviour and corticospinal excitability changes associated with arm movement preparation.

Authors:  Cécilia Neige; Nicolas Mavromatis; Martin Gagné; Laurent J Bouyer; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Muscle length and joint angle influence spinal but not corticospinal excitability to the biceps brachii across forearm postures.

Authors:  Davis A Forman; Daniel Abdel-Malek; Christopher M F Bunce; Michael W R Holmes
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Arm posture-dependent changes in corticospinal excitability are largely spinal in origin.

Authors:  James L Nuzzo; Gabriel S Trajano; Benjamin K Barry; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Is the joint-angle specificity of isometric resistance training real? And if so, does it have a neural basis?

Authors:  Marcel B Lanza; Thomas G Balshaw; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Posture-Dependent Corticomotor Excitability Differs Between the Transferred Biceps in Individuals With Tetraplegia and the Biceps of Nonimpaired Individuals.

Authors:  Carrie L Peterson; Lynn M Rogers; Michael S Bednar; Anne M Bryden; Michael W Keith; Eric J Perreault; Wendy M Murray
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.919

7.  Modulation of corticospinal output in agonist and antagonist proximal arm muscles during motor preparation.

Authors:  Cécilia Neige; Hugo Massé-Alarie; Martin Gagné; Laurent J Bouyer; Catherine Mercier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.