| Literature DB >> 31110554 |
Zhu Zhu1,2, Xiaozhen Zhao1,3, Feng Huang1, Feng Wang1, Wei Wang1,4.
Abstract
Evidence supporting best treatment practices for varicocele is lacking. The effects of a water-soluble polysaccharide extracted from Morinda officinalis (MOP) on the progression of varicocele were evaluated in the present study. The extracted MOP was confirmed as having a high purity of 98% with scant protein contamination, and it mainly consisted of glucose, lactose, and xylose at a molar ratio of 7.63:1.23:0.95 glucose:lactose:xylose. MOPs were administered to experimental left varicocele rats immediately after surgery at doses ranging from 25 to 200 mg/kg. As detected by sperm analysis and histopathological staining, the intragastric administration of 100 mg/kg MOPs significantly improved the sperm parameters of bilateral cauda epididymis, attenuated seminiferous epithelial structures, and inhibited germ cell apoptosis. The results of immunofluorescence and immunoblot showed that administration of 100 mg/kg MOPs effectively inhibited angiogenesis in the bilateral testes but modulated the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2), and MMP9 mildly. These results indicate that inhibition of angiogenesis may be one of the mechanisms by which MOP exerts its inhibitive activities on the progression of varicocele, whereas a relative upregulation of VEGF and MMP-9 may be crucial for the spermatogenetic protective effects of 100 mg/kg MOP administration.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31110554 PMCID: PMC6487148 DOI: 10.1155/2019/8453635
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1UV and FT-IR spectra and HPGPC profile of MOP. (a) UV spectra. (b) FT-IR spectra. (c) A dextran standard with different molecular weights was used to establish a standard curve (black curve). There was one single and symmetrical peak on the HPGPC profile of MOP (red curve).
Sperm parameters and testes apoptosis value of the experimental groups.
| sperm count | abnormal sperm (%) | Testes apoptosis (AI) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ipsilateral | contralateral | ipsilateral | contralateral | ipsilateral | contralateral | |
| SO group | 196.38±13.64 | 199.25±9.12 | 9.83±0.67 | 9.66±0.84 | 1.19±0.22 | 1.18±0.31 |
| ELV group | 96.21±9.11a | 128.63±12.15a | 53.37±7.89a | 46.62±6.21a | ∞a | 12.87±2.92a |
| ddH2O group | 98.73±8.99a | 126.31±9.34 a | 51.21±6.36a | 47.73±7.47a | ∞a | 13.36±4.18a |
| M25 group | 121.37±14.41a | 141.63±8.14 a | 42.24±3.83a | 36.63±4.12a | 7.27±2.18ab | 7.66±2.38ab |
| M50 group | 168.71±11.24b | 187.71±13.36b | 21.23±2.47ab | 16.62±1.34ab | 5.15±1.18 ab | 5.28±1.23ab |
| M100 group | 183.43±18.21b | 194.47±9.22b | 10.29±0.87b | 10.08±0.77b | 3.31±1.12 | 2.54±1.01b |
| M200 group | 162.38±16.88ab | 183.88±12.37ab | 48.61±4.29a | 52.27±5.53a | 8.36±2.24ab | 7.87±1.67ab |
a P<0.05 compared to the SO group.
b P<0.05 compared to the ELV group.
Figure 2Histopathological staining and apoptosis test results of the experimental groups. (a) H&E staining. (b) TUNEL staining. (c) Johnson scores of bilateral testes. (d) Microvessel density of bilateral testes. ∗: P<0.05; ∗∗: P<0.01; ∗∗∗: P<0.001.
Figure 3Effects of MOPs on expression of CD34 and Cas3 in bilateral testes. (a) Immunofluorescence of CD34 and Cas3 in bilateral testes. Green: CD34. Red: Cas3. Blue: nucleus. (b) Immunofluorescence intensities of bilateral CD34. (c) Immunofluorescence intensities of bilateral Cas3. ∗: P<0.05; ∗∗: P<0.01; ∗∗∗: P<0.001.
Figure 4Effects of MOPs on expression of VEGF and p-AKT in bilateral testes. (a) Immunofluorescence of VEGF and p-AKT in bilateral testes. Green: VEGF. Red: p-AKT. Blue: nucleus. (b) Immunofluorescence intensities of bilateral VEGF. (c) Immunofluorescence intensities of bilateral p-AKT. ∗: P<0.05; ∗∗: P<0.01; ∗∗∗: P<0.001.
Figure 5Effects of MOPs on expression of MMP2 and MMP9 in bilateral testes. (a) Immunofluorescence of MMP2 and MMP9 in bilateral testes. Green: MMP9. Red: MMP2. Blue: nucleus. (b) Immunofluorescence intensities of bilateral MMP9. (c) Immunofluorescence intensities of bilateral MMP2. ∗: P<0.05; ∗∗: P<0.01; ∗∗∗: P<0.001.
Figure 6Effects of MOPs on the expression of MMP2 and MMP9 in bilateral testes. (a) Immunofluorescence of MMP2 and MMP9 in bilateral testes. Green: MMP9. Red: MMP2. Blue: nucleus. (b) Immunofluorescence intensities of bilateral MMP9. (c) Immunofluorescence intensities of bilateral MMP2. ∗: P<0.05; ∗∗: P<0.01; ∗∗∗: P<0.001.