| Literature DB >> 33667053 |
Pierre Watcho1, Baudouin Yannick Petnga Tchatat1, Patrick Brice Defo Deeh1, Georges Romeo Bonsou Fozin1, Modeste Wankeu-Nya2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the preventive effects of aqueous and ethanolic extracts of Dracaena arborea on sperm characteristics and oxidative stress markers in adult male rats with varicocele.Entities:
Keywords: Dracaena arborea; Varicocele; antioxidant; rat
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 33667053 PMCID: PMC8312300 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: JBRA Assist Reprod ISSN: 1517-5693
Figure 1Aspect of the internal spermatic vein (A) before and (B) after partial ligation of the left renal vein.
Figure 2Effects of different treatments on the relative weights of testes (A) and epididymis (B). Values are mean±SEM. *:p<0.05 compared to distilled water; α:p<0.05 compared to normal; N: normal; S.O: sham operated; DW: distilled water; Vit E: vitamin E; A.E: aqueous extract; E.E: ethanolic extract.
Effects of different treatments on sperm parameters
| Treatments | Sperm parameters | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shredded epididymis | Density ( | Viability (%) | Motility (%) | Normality (%) | |
|
|
| 183.54 ± 8.04 | 87.260 ± 2.77 | 72.19 ± 1.39 | 83.59 ± 1.70 |
|
| 186.88 ± 16.11 | 96.25 ± 2.01 | 73.61 ± 3.60 | 88.27 ± 2.26 | |
|
| 115.42 ± 4.45[ | 87.33 ±0.88[ | 62.56 ± 4.77 | 64.88 ± 3.16[ | |
|
| 158.54 ± 6.89 | 94.48 ±0.77 | 69.76 ± 7.81 | 73.33 ± 1.90 | |
|
| 140.31 ± 5.47 | 84.94 ±1.26[ | 77.15 ± 4.11 | 81.63 ± 3.01 | |
|
| 129.06 ± 8.24 | 88.24 ±2.00 | 73.44 ± 5.21 | 59.94 ± 2.25[ | |
|
|
| 175.83 ± 4.86 | 86.40 ±1.61 | 77.96 ± 3.15 | 79.25 ± 1.84 |
|
| 181.77 ± 8.17 | 89.83 ±1.36 | 75.93 ± 2.93 | 81.87 ± 1.69 | |
|
| 137.81 ± 7.76[ | 93.23 ±3.56 | 55.43 ± 4.49[ | 44.75 ± 2.80[ | |
|
| 170.42 ± 6.18 | 85.66 ±1.24 | 66.07 ± 5.88 | 73.86 ± 1.09 | |
|
| 159.06 ± 6.62 | 49.11 ±0.56 | 82.84 ± 2.99 | 42.17 ± 0.70 | |
|
| 150.00 ± 7.83 | 84.94 ±1.36 | 74.50 ± 1.57 | 77.14 ± 1.02 | |
All values are expressed as mean±SEM. Number of rats per group=6.
p <0.01 compared to normal.
p <0.05;
p<0.001 compared to distilled water;
p<0.05;
p<0.01;
p<0.001 compared to vitamin E;
p<0.05;
p<0.01;
p<0.001 compared to sham operated.
Effects of different treatments on sperm abnormalities
| Treatments | Sperm abnormalities | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shredded epididymis | Head abnormality (%) | Tail abnormality (%) | Cytoplasmic droplets (%) | Tailless spermatozoa (%) | |
|
|
| 7.04 ± 1.06 | 8.65 ± 2.35 | 2.43 ± 0.60 | 5.06 ± 1.48 |
|
| 3.56 ± 1.23 | 6.14 ± 2.25 | 4.64 ± 0.63 | 2.94 ± 0.55 | |
|
| 14.09 ± 0.84[ | 19.11 ± 1.82[ | 6.90 ± 0.82[ | 7.06 ± 1.02 | |
|
| 10.71 ± 0.53 | 11.85 ± 1.14 | 7.53 ± 0.57 | 5.20 ± 1.15 | |
|
| 5.94 ± 1.00 | 16.77 ± 1.13 | 5.99 ± 0.81 | 2.41 ± 0.80 | |
|
| 5.70 ± 1.17 | 7.40 ± 0.98[ | 2.79 ± 0.47 | 11.33 ± 1.89[ | |
|
|
| 1.61 ± 2.26 | 5.72 ± 0.58 | 5.90 ± 0.87 | 4.52 ± 1.07 |
|
| 1.36 ± 2.53 | 7.00 ± 0.96 | 6.06 ± 1.45 | 5.09 ± 1.09 | |
|
| 3.56 ± 4.27 | 10.73 ± 4.54 | 7.55 ± 1.09 | 6.15 ± 0.46 | |
|
| 1.24 ± 2.51 | 6.66 ± 0.70 | 6.47 ± 1.14 | 5.10 ± 1.12 | |
|
| 0.56 ± 1.54 | 4.51 ± 1.18 | 3.62 ± 0.59 | 3.04 ± 0.38 | |
|
| 1.36 ± 2.74 | 7.65 ± 1.75 | 5.89 ± 1.40 | 5.90 ± 0.36 | |
All values are expressed as mean±SEM. Number of rats per group=6.
p <0.001 compared with normal;
p <0.05;
p <0.01;
p<0.001 compared with distilled water;
p<0.05;
p<0.001 compared with vitamin E.
Figure 3Effects of different treatments on testicular protein levels. Values are mean ± SEM. *: p<0.05 compared to distilled water; N: normal; S.O: sham operated; DW: distilled water; Vit E: vitamin E; A.E: aqueous extract; E.E: ethanolic extract.
Figure 4Effects of different treatments on testicular MDA (A) SOD (B) and catalase (C) activities. Values are mean ± SEM. *: p<0.05 compared to distilled water; αα: p<0.01: compared to normal; bb: p<0.01 compared to sham operated; N: normal; S.O: sham operated; DW: distilled water; Vit E: vitamin E; A.E: aqueous extract; E.E: ethanolic extract.