Literature DB >> 14532796

The long-term clinical impact of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer 5 or more years after radical prostatectomy.

John F Ward1, Michael L Blute, Jeffrey Slezak, Erik J Bergstralh, Horst Zincke.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Information regarding the clinical impact of delayed (5 years or greater) biochemical failure (BF) after radical prostatectomy (RP) is lacking. We undertook an investigation to differentiate the innocuous recurrence of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) from that which heralds an eventual clinical failure (CF), and to determine if there is a period following RP when a patient is cured of clinical disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with clinically localized prostate cancer (PCA) undergoing RP (1987 to 1995) were identified from our longitudinal PCA registry. Outcome measurements were based on the detection of post-RP serum PSA 0.4 ng/ml or greater, clinical identification of cancer recurrence and disease related death.
RESULTS: Following RP in 3,903 eligible men, 33% had a detectable PSA (median followup 8.8 years). Of these BFs 27% occurred after 5 or more disease-free years. Currently, 29% of all men with BF have clinical evidence of PCA, with 8% dying of PCA (median actuarial survival time from CF to death 9.8 years). Progression from BF to CF was not significantly altered by the disease-free interval (p = 0.544). A PSA doubling time less than 12 months significantly increased the risk of CF regardless of the interval from surgery. Risk factors for BF were significant throughout the duration of followup.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients are at prolonged risk for BF and CF following RP. Regardless of the timing of the initial PSA recurrence the PSA doubling time is the most powerful predictor of progression, stratifying patients with BF into high and low risk groups for CF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14532796     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000091876.13656.2e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  60 in total

1.  Factors determining biochemical recurrence in low-risk prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sıtkı Ün; Hakan Türk; Osman Koca; Rauf Taner Divrik; Ferruh Zorlu
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

2.  Detection of recurrent prostate carcinoma with anti-1-amino-3-18F-fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid PET/CT and 111In-capromab pendetide SPECT/CT.

Authors:  David M Schuster; Bital Savir-Baruch; Peter T Nieh; Viraj A Master; Raghuveer K Halkar; Peter J Rossi; Melinda M Lewis; Jonathon A Nye; Weiping Yu; F DuBois Bowman; Mark M Goodman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  TMPRSS2-ETS fusion prostate cancer: biological and clinical implications.

Authors:  Francesca Demichelis; Mark A Rubin
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  Incomplete prostatectomy for cancer.

Authors:  Mark Soloway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Other paradigms: growth rate constants and tumor burden determined using computed tomography data correlate strongly with the overall survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Wilfred D Stein; Hui Huang; Michael Menefee; Maureen Edgerly; Herb Kotz; Andrew Dwyer; James Yang; Susan E Bates
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.360

6.  Timing of Prostate-specific Antigen Nadir After Radical Prostatectomy and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  Stephanie L Skove; Lauren E Howard; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Matthew R Cooperberg; Daniel M Moreira; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-07-19       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Initial single-centre Canadian experience with 18F-fluoromethylcholine positron emission tomography-computed tomography (18F-FCH PET/CT) for biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients initially treated with curative intent.

Authors:  Simon Gauvin; Yannick Cerantola; Eléonore Haberer; Vincent Pelsser; Stephan Probst; Franck Bladou; Maurice Anidjar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Comparative performance of PET tracers in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of literature.

Authors:  Chung Yao Yu; Bhushan Desai; Lingyun Ji; Susan Groshen; Hossein Jadvar
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-09-06

9.  In Organ-confined Prostate Cancer, Tumor Quantitation Not Found to Aid in Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence.

Authors:  Yujiro Ito; Emily A Vertosick; Daniel D Sjoberg; Andrew J Vickers; Hikmat A Al-Ahmadie; Ying-Bei Chen; Anuradha Gopalan; Sahussapont J Sirintrapun; Satish K Tickoo; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Victor E Reuter; Samson W Fine
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Prostate-specific antigen measured 3 months after radical prostatectomy as a new predictor of biochemical recurrence.

Authors:  Hitoshi Inoue; Kensaku Nishimura; Seiji Yamaguchi; Norio Nonomura; Tsuneo Hara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.