Gareth Rivalland1,2,3, Paul Mitchell1,4, Carmel Murone1, Khashayer Asadi5, Adrienne L Morey6, Maud Starmans7,8, Paul C Boutros3,7,9, Marzena Walkiewicz1, Benjamin Solomon10, Gavin Wright11,12, Simon Knight13, Thomas John1,2,4. 1. Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. 3. Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 4. Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia. 5. Department of Pathology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia. 6. Department of Anatomical Pathology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, Australia. 7. Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada. 8. Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 9. Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 10. Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia. 11. Research and Education Lead in Lung Cancer, Victorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Parkville, Australia. 12. Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, St Vincent's Hospital, Fitzroy, Australia. 13. Department of Thoracic Surgery, Austin Health, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mesenchyme to epithelial transition (MET) protein abundance increases with disease stage and is implicated in resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. To better clarify the impact of MET overexpression on tumor behavior, we investigated a large cohort of patients who underwent curative surgical resection to determine whether MET gene amplification or protein abundance was prognostic. METHODS: Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed using triplicate 1 mm cores of FFPE primary NSCLC specimens. TMAs underwent immunohistochemical (IHC) staining with the SP44 clone (Ventana) and cores were considered positive if >50% of tumor exhibited 2+ staining. The highest of triplicate values was used. MET gene amplification was detected using either SISH using Ventana's MET DNP probe or FISH using the D7S486/CEP 7 Abbott Probe. DNA was subjected to mutational profiling using Sequenom's LungCarta panel. RESULTS: Data from two institutions comprising 763 patients (516; 68%) male were generated, including 360 stage I, 226 stage II, 160 stage III and 18 resected stage IV. High MET protein expression was detected in 25% (193/763), and was significantly more common in adenocarcinomas than squamous cell carcinoma (P<0.01). MET gene copy number (GCN) correlated with high MET protein expression by IHC (P=0.01). Increased MET protein expression was associated with EGFR and KRAS mutations (P<0.01 for both). Once polysomy was excluded, true MET gene amplification was detected in only 8/763 (1%) of samples. In multivariate analysis, neither MET protein abundance nor GCN were correlated to overall patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: MET expression by IHC and GCN amplification was not prognostic in this large Caucasian surgical series. MET's primary role remains as a therapeutic target.
BACKGROUND: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), mesenchyme to epithelial transition (MET) protein abundance increases with disease stage and is implicated in resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. To better clarify the impact of MET overexpression on tumor behavior, we investigated a large cohort of patients who underwent curative surgical resection to determine whether MET gene amplification or protein abundance was prognostic. METHODS: Tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed using triplicate 1 mm cores of FFPE primary NSCLC specimens. TMAs underwent immunohistochemical (IHC) staining with the SP44 clone (Ventana) and cores were considered positive if >50% of tumor exhibited 2+ staining. The highest of triplicate values was used. MET gene amplification was detected using either SISH using Ventana's MET DNP probe or FISH using the D7S486/CEP 7 Abbott Probe. DNA was subjected to mutational profiling using Sequenom's LungCarta panel. RESULTS: Data from two institutions comprising 763 patients (516; 68%) male were generated, including 360 stage I, 226 stage II, 160 stage III and 18 resected stage IV. High MET protein expression was detected in 25% (193/763), and was significantly more common in adenocarcinomas than squamous cell carcinoma (P<0.01). MET gene copy number (GCN) correlated with high MET protein expression by IHC (P=0.01). Increased MET protein expression was associated with EGFR and KRAS mutations (P<0.01 for both). Once polysomy was excluded, true MET gene amplification was detected in only 8/763 (1%) of samples. In multivariate analysis, neither MET protein abundance nor GCN were correlated to overall patient survival. CONCLUSIONS: MET expression by IHC and GCN amplification was not prognostic in this large Caucasian surgical series. MET's primary role remains as a therapeutic target.
Entities:
Keywords:
Immunohistochemistry; in situ hybridisation; mesenchyme to epithelial transition amplification (MET amplification); mesenchyme to epithelial transition receptor (MET receptor); non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Authors: David R Spigel; Howard A Burris; F Anthony Greco; Dianna L Shipley; Elke K Friedman; David M Waterhouse; Robert C Whorf; R Brian Mitchell; Davey B Daniel; Jeffrey Zangmeister; J David Bass; John D Hainsworth Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-05-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Eunice L Kwak; Christina Siwak-Tapp; Joni Dy; Kristin Bergethon; Jeffrey W Clark; D Ross Camidge; Benjamin J Solomon; Robert G Maki; Yung-Jue Bang; Dong-Wan Kim; James Christensen; Weiwei Tan; Keith D Wilner; Ravi Salgia; A John Iafrate Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Rafal Dziadziuszko; Murry W Wynes; Shalini Singh; Bernadette Reyna Asuncion; James Ranger-Moore; Krzysztof Konopa; Witold Rzyman; Barbara Szostakiewicz; Jacek Jassem; Fred R Hirsch Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Soundararajan Krishnaswamy; Rajani Kanteti; Jonathan S Duke-Cohan; Sivakumar Loganathan; Wanqing Liu; Patrick C Ma; Martin Sattler; Patrick A Singleton; Nithya Ramnath; Federico Innocenti; Dan L Nicolae; Zheng Ouyang; Jie Liang; John Minna; Mark F Kozloff; Mark K Ferguson; Viswanathan Natarajan; Yi-Ching Wang; Joe G N Garcia; Everett E Vokes; Ravi Salgia Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thomas John; Maud H W Starmans; Yao-Tseng Chen; Prudence A Russell; Stephen A Barnett; Shane C White; Paul L Mitchell; Marzena Walkiewicz; Arun Azad; Philippe Lambin; Ming-Sound Tsao; Siddhartha Deb; Nasser Altorki; Gavin Wright; Simon Knight; Paul C Boutros; Jonathan S Cebon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 3.240