PURPOSE: African Americans have higher incidence and poorer response to lung cancer treatment compared with Caucasians. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms for the significant ethnic difference are not known. The present study examines the ethnic differences in the type and frequency of MET proto-oncogene (MET) mutation in lung cancer and correlated them with other frequently mutated genes such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), KRAS2, and TP53. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using tumor tissue genomic DNA from 141 Asian, 76 Caucasian, and 66 African American lung cancer patients, exons coding for MET and EGFR were PCR amplified, and mutations were detected by sequencing. Mutation carriers were further screened for KRAS2 and TP53 mutations. Functional implications of important MET mutations were explored by molecular modeling and hepatocyte growth factor binding studies. RESULTS: Unlike the frequently encountered somatic mutations in EGFR, MET mutations in lung tumors were germline. MET-N375S, the most frequent mutation of MET, occurred in 13% of East Asians compared with none in African Americans. The frequency of MET mutations was highest among male smokers and squamous cell carcinoma. The MET-N375S mutation seems to confer resistance to MET inhibition based on hepatocyte growth factor ligand binding, molecular modeling, and apoptotic susceptibility to MET inhibitor studies. CONCLUSIONS: MET in lung cancer tissues contained nonsynonymous mutations in the semaphorin and juxtamembrane domains but not in the tyrosine kinase domain. All the MET mutations were germline. East Asians, African-Americans, and Caucasians had different MET genotypes and haplotypes. MET mutations in the semaphorin domain affected ligand binding.
PURPOSE: African Americans have higher incidence and poorer response to lung cancer treatment compared with Caucasians. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms for the significant ethnic difference are not known. The present study examines the ethnic differences in the type and frequency of MET proto-oncogene (MET) mutation in lung cancer and correlated them with other frequently mutated genes such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), KRAS2, and TP53. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Using tumor tissue genomic DNA from 141 Asian, 76 Caucasian, and 66 African American lung cancerpatients, exons coding for MET and EGFR were PCR amplified, and mutations were detected by sequencing. Mutation carriers were further screened for KRAS2 and TP53 mutations. Functional implications of important MET mutations were explored by molecular modeling and hepatocyte growth factor binding studies. RESULTS: Unlike the frequently encountered somatic mutations in EGFR, MET mutations in lung tumors were germline. MET-N375S, the most frequent mutation of MET, occurred in 13% of East Asians compared with none in African Americans. The frequency of MET mutations was highest among male smokers and squamous cell carcinoma. The MET-N375S mutation seems to confer resistance to MET inhibition based on hepatocyte growth factor ligand binding, molecular modeling, and apoptotic susceptibility to MET inhibitor studies. CONCLUSIONS: MET in lung cancer tissues contained nonsynonymous mutations in the semaphorin and juxtamembrane domains but not in the tyrosine kinase domain. All the MET mutations were germline. East Asians, African-Americans, and Caucasians had different MET genotypes and haplotypes. MET mutations in the semaphorin domain affected ligand binding.
Authors: M F Di Renzo; M Olivero; T Martone; A Maffe; P Maggiora; A D Stefani; G Valente; S Giordano; G Cortesina; P M Comoglio Journal: Oncogene Date: 2000-03-16 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: Xifeng Wu; Hua Zhao; Christopher I Amos; Sanjay Shete; Nimisha Makan; Waun K Hong; Fred F Kadlubar; Margaret R Spitz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-05-01 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Patrick C Ma; Takashi Kijima; Gautam Maulik; Edward A Fox; Martin Sattler; James D Griffin; Bruce E Johnson; Ravi Salgia Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Outi Kilpivaara; Semanti Mukherjee; Alison M Schram; Martha Wadleigh; Ann Mullally; Benjamin L Ebert; Adam Bass; Sachie Marubayashi; Adriana Heguy; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Hagop Kantarjian; Kenneth Offit; Richard M Stone; D Gary Gilliland; Robert J Klein; Ross L Levine Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2009-03-15 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: J Guillermo Paez; Pasi A Jänne; Jeffrey C Lee; Sean Tracy; Heidi Greulich; Stacey Gabriel; Paula Herman; Frederic J Kaye; Neal Lindeman; Titus J Boggon; Katsuhiko Naoki; Hidefumi Sasaki; Yoshitaka Fujii; Michael J Eck; William R Sellers; Bruce E Johnson; Matthew Meyerson Journal: Science Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Thomas J Lynch; Daphne W Bell; Raffaella Sordella; Sarada Gurubhagavatula; Ross A Okimoto; Brian W Brannigan; Patricia L Harris; Sara M Haserlat; Jeffrey G Supko; Frank G Haluska; David N Louis; David C Christiani; Jeff Settleman; Daniel A Haber Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-04-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Haiying Cheng; H Dean Hosgood; Lei Deng; Kenny Ye; Christopher Su; Janaki Sharma; Yuanquan Yang; Balazs Halmos; Roman Perez-Soler Journal: Clin Lung Cancer Date: 2019-07-17 Impact factor: 4.785
Authors: Paul K Paik; Alexander Drilon; Pang-Dian Fan; Helena Yu; Natasha Rekhtman; Michelle S Ginsberg; Laetitia Borsu; Nikolaus Schultz; Michael F Berger; Charles M Rudin; Marc Ladanyi Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Luiz H Araujo; Cynthia Timmers; Erica Hlavin Bell; Konstantin Shilo; Philip E Lammers; Weiqiang Zhao; Thanemozhi G Natarajan; Clinton J Miller; Jianying Zhang; Ayse S Yilmaz; Tom Liu; Kevin Coombes; Joseph Amann; David P Carbone Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 44.544