Literature DB >> 31102064

Investigation of Low-Dose CT Lung Cancer Screening Scan "Over-Range" Issue Using Machine Learning Methods.

Donglai Huo1, Mark Kiehn2, Ann Scherzinger3.   

Abstract

Low-dose computed tomography (CT) lung cancer screening is recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force for high lung cancer-risk populations. In this study, we investigated an important factor affecting the CT dose-the scan length, for this CT exam. A neural network model based on the "UNET" framework was established to segment the lung region in the CT scout images. It was trained initially with 247 chest X-ray images and then with 40 CT scout images. The mean Intersection over Union (IOU) and Dice coefficient were reported to be 0.954 and 0.976, respectively. Lung scan boundaries were determined from this segmentation and compared with the boundaries marked by an expert for 150 validation images, resulting an average 4.7% difference. Seven hundred seventy CT low-dose lung screening exams were retrospectively analyzed with the validated model. The average "desired" scan length was 252 mm with a standard deviation of 28 mm. The average "over-range" was 58.5 mm or 24%. The upper boundary (superior) on average had an "over-range" of 17 mm, and the lower boundary (inferior) on average had an "over-range" of 41 mm. Further analysis of this data showed that the extent of "over-range" was independent of acquisition date, acquisition time, acquisition station, and patient age, but dependent on technologist and patient weight. We concluded that this machine learning method could effectively support quality control on the scan length for CT low-dose screening scans, enabling the eliminations of unnecessary patient dose.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial neural network; CT dose; CT lung cancer screening; Convolutional neural network; Machine learning

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31102064      PMCID: PMC6841821          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-019-00233-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  Development of a digital image database for chest radiographs with and without a lung nodule: receiver operating characteristic analysis of radiologists' detection of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  J Shiraishi; S Katsuragawa; J Ikezoe; T Matsumoto; T Kobayashi; K Komatsu; M Matsui; H Fujita; Y Kodera; K Doi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  Natural Language Processing Technologies in Radiology Research and Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Tianrun Cai; Andreas A Giannopoulos; Sheng Yu; Tatiana Kelil; Beth Ripley; Kanako K Kumamaru; Frank J Rybicki; Dimitrios Mitsouras
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Segmentation of anatomical structures in chest radiographs using supervised methods: a comparative study on a public database.

Authors:  Bram van Ginneken; Mikkel B Stegmann; Marco Loog
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007.

Authors:  Fred A Mettler; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Keith Faulkner; Debbie B Gilley; Joel E Gray; Geoffrey S Ibbott; Jill A Lipoti; Mahadevappa Mahesh; John L McCrohan; Michael G Stabin; Bruce R Thomadsen; Terry T Yoshizumi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 5.  A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Thijs Kooi; Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Arnaud Arindra Adiyoso Setio; Francesco Ciompi; Mohsen Ghafoorian; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Bram van Ginneken; Clara I Sánchez
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Screening for lung cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Deep Learning for Health Informatics.

Authors:  Daniele Ravi; Charence Wong; Fani Deligianni; Melissa Berthelot; Javier Andreu-Perez; Benny Lo; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 5.772

  9 in total
  3 in total

1.  Automatic Scan Range Delimitation in Chest CT Using Deep Learning.

Authors:  Aydin Demircioğlu; Moon-Sung Kim; Magdalena Charis Stein; Nika Guberina; Lale Umutlu; Kai Nassenstein
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2021-02-10

2.  Value of low-dose and optimized-length computed tomography (CT) scan in CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Hui Yuan; Da Li; Yan Zhang; Xiaozhen Xie; Lujun Shen
Journal:  J Interv Med       Date:  2021-05-21

3.  Utilization of Mid-Thigh Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Lean Body Mass and Knee Extensor Strength in Obese Adults.

Authors:  Stephan G Bodkin; Andrew C Smith; Bryan C Bergman; Donglai Huo; Kenneth A Weber; Simona Zarini; Darcy Kahn; Amanda Garfield; Emily Macias; Michael O Harris-Love
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2022-03-24
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.