| Literature DB >> 31100095 |
I-Chen Li1, Li-Ya Lee1, Ying-Ju Chen2, Ming-Yu Chou2, Ming-Fu Wang2, Wan-Ping Chen1, Yen-Po Chen1, Chin-Chu Chen1,3,4,5.
Abstract
Erinacine A-enriched Hericium erinaceus mycelia is a well-established potential therapeutic agent for neurodegenerative disorders. However, the effect of erinacine A-enriched H. erinaceus mycelia on promoting longevity remains unclear. This is the first study to investigate the effect of erinacine A-enriched H. erinaceus mycelia on lifespan-prolonging activity in Drosophila melanogaster and senescence-accelerated P8 (SAMP8) mice. Two hundred D. melanogaster and 80 SAMP8 mice of both sexes were randomly divided into four groups and were administered with either the standard, low-dose, mid-dose, or high-dose erinacine A-enriched H. erinaceus mycelia. After treatment, the lifespan was measured in D. melanogaster, and the lifespan, food intake and oxidative damage were evaluated in SAMP8 mice. Results showed that supplementation with erinacine A-enriched H. erinaceus mycelia extended the lifespan in both D. melanogaster and SAMP8 by a maximum of 32% and 23%, respectively, compared to the untreated controls. Moreover, erinacine A-enriched H. erinaceus mycelia decreased TBARS levels and induced the anti-oxidative enzyme activities of superoxide dismutase, catalase, and glutathione peroxidase. Together, these findings suggest that erinacine A-enriched H. erinaceus mycelia supplement could promote longevity, mediated partly through the induction of endogenous antioxidants enzymes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31100095 PMCID: PMC6524823 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1(A, B) Maximum lifespan, (C, D) mean lifespan, and 50% survival time extension by different concentrations of erinacine A-enriched H. erinaceus mycelia in Drosophila (A, C) male and (B, D) female flies (n = 200). *p < 0.05 compared with the control group.
Statistical analysis of mean and median survival time in male and female Drosophila after exposure to erinacine A-enriched H. erinaceus mycelia.
| Groups | Number | Censored | Mean Survival Time (days) | 95% CI | Median Survival Time (days) | 95% CI | Log Rank p value (vs control) | Log Rank p value (vs low-dose) | Log Rank p value (vs mid-dose) |
| Control | 200 | 0 | 28.52 | [26.818–30.222] | 30 | [28.37–31.63] | |||
| 0.11 mg/mL | 200 | 0 | 33.47 | [31.518–35.422] | 34 | [31.48–36.52] | 0.000 | ||
| 0.35 mg/mL | 200 | 0 | 35.75 | [33.69–37.81] | 38 | [35.693–40.307] | 0.000 | 0.017 | |
| 1.05 mg/mL | 200 | 0 | 36.96 | [35.248–38.672] | 38 | [35.56–40.44] | 0.000 | 0.44 | 0.621 |
| Groups | Number | Censored | Mean Survival Time (days) | 95% CI | Median Survival Time (days) | 95% CI | Log Rank p value (vs control) | Log Rank p value (vs low-dose) | Log Rank p value (vs mid-dose) |
| Control | 200 | 0 | 27.77 | [26.122–30.222] | 30 | [28.16–31.84] | |||
| 0.11 mg/mL | 200 | 0 | 31.63 | [29.577–33.683] | 34 | [31.754–36.246] | 0.000 | ||
| 0.35 mg/mL | 200 | 0 | 34.79 | [32.447–37.133] | 38 | [33.842–42.158] | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| 1.05 mg/mL | 200 | 0 | 34.15 | [31.897–36.403] | 38 | [33.738–42.262] | 0.000 | 0.005 | 0.235 |
Fig 2(A, B) Maximum lifespan, (C, D) mean lifespan, and 50% survival time extension by different concentrations of erinacine A-enriched H. erinaceus mycelia in SAMP8 (A, C) male and (B, D) female mice (n = 80). *p < 0.05 compared with the control group.
Statistical analysis of mean and median survival time in male and female SAMP8 mice after exposure to erinacine A-enriched H. erinaceus mycelia.
| Groups | Number | Censored | Mean Survival Time (months) | 95% CI | Median Survival Time (months) | 95% CI | Log Rank p value (vs control) | Log Rank p value (vs low-dose) | Log Rank p value (vs mid-dose) |
| Control | 20 | 0 | 10.05 | [9.112–10.988] | 10 | [7.82–12.18] | |||
| Low-dose | 20 | 0 | 10.9 | [9.728–12.072] | 10 | [8.91–11.09] | 0.135 | ||
| Mid-dose | 20 | 0 | 11.6 | [10.241–12.959] | 11 | [8.809–13.191] | 0.027 | 0.256 | |
| High-dose | 20 | 0 | 12.05 | [10.798–13.302] | 12 | [9.82–14.18] | 0.007 | 0.14 | 0.73 |
| Groups | Number | Censored | Mean Survival Time (months) | 95% CI | Median Survival Time (months) | 95% CI | Log Rank p value (vs control) | Log Rank p value (vs low-dose) | Log Rank p value (vs mid-dose) |
| Control | 20 | 0 | 10.3 | [9.274–11.326] | 10 | [7.82–12.18] | |||
| Low-dose | 20 | 0 | 10.65 | [9.555–11.745] | 10 | [8.546–11.454] | 0.482 | ||
| Mid-dose | 20 | 0 | 11.5 | [10.289–12.711] | 11 | [8.82–13.18] | 0.087 | 0.203 | |
| High-dose | 20 | 0 | 12.2 | [11.04–13.36] | 11 | [9.247–12.753] | 0.014 | 0.04 | 0.466 |
Body weights, food intakes, and water consumption in SAMP8 mice fed with different doses of erinacine A-enriched H. erinaceus mycelia for 13 weeks.
| Sex | Groups | Body Weight (g) | Food Intake (g/day) | Water Consumption (mL/day) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | Final | Gain | ||||||||||||||
| Male | Control | 28.40 | ± | 0.27 | 31.26 | ± | 0.30 | 2.85 | ± | 0.14 | 5.59 | ± | 0.05 | 6.32 | ± | 0.10 |
| Low-dose | 28.21 | ± | 0.18 | 30.82 | ± | 0.24 | 2.61 | ± | 0.16 | 5.65 | ± | 0.04 | 6.36 | ± | 0.09 | |
| Mid-dose | 28.22 | ± | 0.20 | 30.85 | ± | 0.23 | 2.63 | ± | 0.17 | 5.57 | ± | 0.05 | 6.45 | ± | 0.08 | |
| High-dose | 28.38 | ± | 0.27 | 31.03 | ± | 0.39 | 2.65 | ± | 0.24 | 5.58 | ± | 0.06 | 6.52 | ± | 0.09 | |
| Female | Control | 28.44 | ± | 0.18 | 29.61 | ± | 0.22 | 1.17 | ± | 0.09 | 4.95 | ± | 0.05 | 4.97 | ± | 0.08 |
| Low-dose | 28.69 | ± | 0.20 | 29.72 | ± | 0.23 | 1.03 | ± | 0.09 | 5.00 | ± | 0.04 | 4.97 | ± | 0.07 | |
| Mid-dose | 28.71 | ± | 0.25 | 29.80 | ± | 0.31 | 1.09 | ± | 0.15 | 5.02 | ± | 0.05 | 4.91 | ± | 0.06 | |
| High-dose | 28.57 | ± | 0.14 | 29.53 | ± | 0.17 | 0.96 | ± | 0.11 | 4.96 | ± | 0.04 | 4.98 | ± | 0.08 | |
Values were expressed as mean ± SEM and analyzed by one-way ANOVA (n = 80).
Fig 3Effect of 13 weeks of erinacine A-enriched of (A) thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), (B) superoxide dismutase (SOD), (C) catalase, and (D) glutathione peroxidase (GPx) in the liver of SAMP8 mice (n = 80). Different letters indicate significant differences in the mean values.