| Literature DB >> 31096992 |
Si Yin1, Heng Du2, Weigong Zhao1, Shaohui Ma3, Ming Zhang3, Min Guan4, Miao Liu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The vertebral endplate route was demonstrated to be the main pathway for nutrition to the intervertebral disc. However, it is still a controversial issue on whether the blocking of the endplate nutritional pathway could result in intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) in animal models. The aim was therefore to investigate the effect of the inhibition of both endplate nutritional pathways by bone cement injection on the IDD in a goat model.Entities:
Keywords: Bone cement; Endplate nutritional pathway; Goat model; Intervertebral disc degeneration
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31096992 PMCID: PMC6521378 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1188-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1The surgical procedure of blocking both endplate nutritional pathways by cement injection. The determined lumbar vertebral bodies and intervertebral discs were exposed (a), and the slots were made parallel and close to the endplates (about 2 mm away) (green arrows in b). The bone cement was injected to fill the bone defect (yellow arrows in c), and the lumber vertebral laminas after osteotomy were shown in d
The effective cement blocking area, % DHI, and IDD grade after 48 weeks of surgery
| Number | Cement injection | Normal control | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disc location | Blocking area (%) | % DHI | IDD grade | Disc location | % DHI | IDD grade | |
| 1 | L2–3 | 52.9 | 79.2 | 3 | L1–2 | 85.7 | 2 |
| L3–4 | 57.2 | 75.3 | 4 | L4–5 | 92.6 | 1 | |
| 2 | L2–3 | 54.7 | 81.7 | 3 | L1–2 | 80.2 | 1 |
| L3–4 | 62.5 | 69.0 | 5 | L4–5 | 88.0 | 1 | |
| 3 | L2–3 | 58.4 | 77.8 | 4 | L1–2 | 90.5 | 1 |
| L3–4 | 59.8 | 72.7 | 4 | L4–5 | 82.1 | 2 | |
| 4 | L2–3 | 58.5 | 72.6 | 3 | L1–2 | 85.3 | 2 |
| L3–4 | 69.6 | 70.7 | 5 | L4–5 | 93.8 | 1 | |
| 5 | L2–3 | 62.5 | 68.2 | 4 | L1–2 | 84.7 | 1 |
| L3–4 | 67.2 | 60.5 | 5 | L4–5 | 85.6 | 1 | |
| 6 | L2–3 | 63.9 | 66.8 | 4 | L1–2 | 79.4 | 2 |
| L3–4 | 49.6 | 79.2 | 3 | L4–5 | 82.0 | 2 | |
| 7 | L2–3 | 64.7 | 66.5 | 4 | L1–2 | 90.5 | 1 |
| L3–4 | 63.2 | 73.8 | 4 | L4–5 | 86.3 | 2 | |
| 8 | L2–3 | 65.7 | 74.0 | 5 | L1–2 | 83.2 | 2 |
| L3–4 | 61.4 | 75.4 | 4 | L4–5 | 93.7 | 1 | |
| Mean | 60.7 ± 5.3 | 72.7 ± 5.6* | 4.0 ± 0.7* | 86.5 ± 4.6* | 1.4 ± 0.5* | ||
DHI disc height index, IDD intervertebral disc degeneration
*Difference between experimental and control groups was significant
Fig. 2The histological images of the intervertebral discs at 12, 24, and 48 weeks after surgery. a–d The HE stainings of nucleus pulposus. e–h The HE stainings of cartilage endplates. i–l The Masson trichrome stainings of intervertebral discs. m–p The Safranin O stainings of intervertebral discs. q–t The proteoglycan stainings of intervertebral discs. u–w The Sirius Red stainings of intervertebral discs