Literature DB >> 35836965

Proper animal experimental designs for preclinical research of biomaterials for intervertebral disc regeneration.

Yizhong Peng1, Xiangcheng Qing1, Hongyang Shu2,3, Shuo Tian1, Wenbo Yang1, Songfeng Chen4, Hui Lin1, Xiao Lv1, Lei Zhao1, Xi Chen1, Feifei Pu1, Donghua Huang4, Xu Cao5, Zengwu Shao1.   

Abstract

Low back pain is a vital musculoskeletal disease that impairs life quality, leads to disability and imposes heavy economic burden on the society, while it is greatly attributed to intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD). However, the existing treatments, such as medicines, chiropractic adjustments and surgery, cannot achieve ideal disc regeneration. Therefore, advanced bioactive therapies are implemented, including stem cells delivery, bioreagents administration, and implantation of biomaterials etc. Among these researches, few reported unsatisfying regenerative outcomes. However, these advanced therapies have barely achieved successful clinical translation. The main reason for the inconsistency between satisfying preclinical results and poor clinical translation may largely rely on the animal models that cannot actually simulate the human disc degeneration. The inappropriate animal model also leads to difficulties in comparing the efficacies among biomaterials in different reaches. Therefore, animal models that better simulate the clinical charateristics of human IDD should be acknowledged. In addition, in vivo regenerative outcomes should be carefully evaluated to obtain robust results. Nevertheless, many researches neglect certain critical characteristics, such as adhesive properties for biomaterials blocking annulus fibrosus defects and hyperalgesia that is closely related to the clinical manifestations, e.g., low back pain. Herein, in this review, we summarized the animal models established for IDD, and highlighted the proper models and parameters that may result in acknowledged IDD models. Then, we discussed the existing biomaterials for disc regeneration and the characteristics that should be considered for regenerating different parts of discs. Finally, well-established assays and parameters for in vivo disc regeneration are explored.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal model; biomaterials; intervertebral disc; preclinical evaluation; translational medicine

Year:  2021        PMID: 35836965      PMCID: PMC9255780          DOI: 10.12336/biomatertransl.2021.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomater Transl        ISSN: 2096-112X


  791 in total

1.  Characterization of a developing lumbar arthrodesis in a sheep model with quantitative instability.

Authors:  Mark R Foster; Matthew J Allen; Joanne E Schoonmaker; Hansen A Yuan; Atsunori Kanazawa; Soo-An Park; Baowei Liu
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 2.  Current concepts for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Thami Benzakour; Vasilios Igoumenou; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Ahmed Benzakour
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Alpha-Gal detectors in xenotransplantation research: a word of caution.

Authors:  Filippo Naso; Alessandro Gandaglia; Laura Iop; Michele Spina; Gino Gerosa
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.907

4.  Assessment of changes in the micro-nano environment of intervertebral disc degeneration based on Pfirrmann grade.

Authors:  Yan-Jun Che; Jiang-Bo Guo; Ting Liang; Xi Chen; Wen Zhang; Hui-Lin Yang; Zong-Ping Luo
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Degeneration and the chemical composition of the human lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  R H Pearce; B J Grimmer; M E Adams
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Silk-based multilayered angle-ply annulus fibrosus construct to recapitulate form and function of the intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Bibhas K Bhunia; David L Kaplan; Biman B Mandal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Evaluation of digestive proteinases from the Antarctic krill Euphasia superba as potential chemonucleolytic agents. In vitro and in vivo studies.

Authors:  J Melrose; A Hall; C Macpherson; C R Bellenger; P Ghosh
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Transplantation of human mesenchymal stems cells into intervertebral discs in a xenogeneic porcine model.

Authors:  Helena B Henriksson; Teresia Svanvik; Marianne Jonsson; Margret Hagman; Michael Horn; Anders Lindahl; Helena Brisby
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings.

Authors:  Roger B Fillingim; Christopher D King; Margarete C Ribeiro-Dasilva; Bridgett Rahim-Williams; Joseph L Riley
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.820

10.  Aging and degeneration in the lumbar intervertebral disc.

Authors:  K P Pritzker
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The role of microenvironment in stem cell-based regeneration of intervertebral disc.

Authors:  Genglei Chu; Weidong Zhang; Feng Han; Kexin Li; Chengyuan Liu; Qiang Wei; Huan Wang; Yijie Liu; Fengxuan Han; Bin Li
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-08-09

Review 2.  Characteristics and mechanisms of resorption in lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Pengfei Yu; Feng Mao; Jingyun Chen; Xiaoying Ma; Yuxiang Dai; Guanhong Liu; Feng Dai; Jingtao Liu
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 5.606

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.