Literature DB >> 28306517

Biomechanical analysis of stiffness and fracture displacement after using PMMA-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation for sacrum fractures.

Andreas Höch1, Richard Schimpf1, Niels Hammer1, Stefan Schleifenbaum1, Michael Werner1, Christoph Josten1, Jörg Böhme1.   

Abstract

Cement augmentation of pedicle screws is the gold standard for the stabilization of osteoporotic fractures of the spine. In-screw cement augmentation, in which cement is injected through the cannula, is another option for fracture stabilization of fragility fractures of the sacrum. However, biomechanical superiority of this technique compared to conventional sacroiliac screw fixation has not been tested. The present study compares the stability of cement-augmented and non-cement-augmented sacroiliac screw fixation in osteoporotic sacrum fractures under cyclic loading. Eight human donor pelvises with intact ligaments and 5th lumbar vertebra were dissected. A vertical shear fracture was created as a combination of a sacrum fracture and cutting of the symphysis. Both sides were tested in a single-limb-stance setup with 10,000 loading cycles applied. Stiffness of the pelvis and displacement of the fracture were measured using a hydraulic testing machine and a 3D image correlation system. The augmented screw fixation failed in two of eight pelvises, and the non-augmented screws failed in three of eight pelvises. CT scans showed no leakage of cement. In-screw polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) augmentation showed no advantage based on measured displacement of the sacrum fractures or stiffness for sacroiliac screw fixation of fragility fractures of the sacrum.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PMMA; biomechanical analysis; fragility fracture; osteoporosis; pelvic fracture; sacroiliac screw fixation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28306517     DOI: 10.1515/bmt-2016-0235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)        ISSN: 0013-5585            Impact factor:   1.411


  5 in total

1.  Physiological in vitro sacroiliac joint motion: a study on three-dimensional posterior pelvic ring kinematics.

Authors:  Niels Hammer; Mario Scholze; Thomas Kibsgård; Stefan Klima; Stefan Schleifenbaum; Thomas Seidel; Michael Werner; Ronny Grunert
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2018-12-09       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  CT-Guided Pelvic Osteosynthesis.

Authors:  Gerd Reuther
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  In-screw polymethylmethacrylate-augmented sacroiliac screw for the treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis: a prospective, observational study with 1-year follow-up.

Authors:  Andreas Höch; Philipp Pieroh; Ralf Henkelmann; Christoph Josten; Jörg Böhme
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  On the influence of surface coating on tissue biomechanics - effects on rat bones under routine conditions with implications for image-based deformation detection.

Authors:  Aqeeda Singh; Mario Scholze; Niels Hammer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Pelvic orthosis effects on posterior pelvis kinematics An in-vitro biomechanical study.

Authors:  Stefan Klima; Ronny Grunert; Benjamin Ondruschka; Mario Scholze; Thomas Seidel; Michael Werner; Niels Hammer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.