| Literature DB >> 31091706 |
Phoenix Hwaung1, Moonseong Heo2, Brianna Bourgeois3, Samantha Kennedy4, John Shepherd5, Steven B Heymsfield6.
Abstract
Background: Previous studies link tall stature with a reduced ischemic stroke risk. One theory posits that tall people have larger cerebral artery lumens and therefore have a lower plaque occlusion risk than those who are short. Previous studies have not critically evaluated the associations between height and cerebral artery structure independent of confounding factors.Entities:
Keywords: cerebrovascular disease; clinical; ultrasound
Year: 2019 PMID: 31091706 PMCID: PMC6631842 DOI: 10.3390/medicines6020057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicines (Basel) ISSN: 2305-6320
Subject characteristics.
| Men | Women | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 101 | 130 | 231 |
|
| 45.7 ± 17.7 | 47.7 ± 17.0 | 46.8 ± 17.3 |
|
| 90.2 ± 21.8 | 72.3 ± 19.2 ‡ | 80.1 ± 22.2 |
|
| 177.3 ± 6.9 | 162.4 ± 6.6 ‡ | 168.9 ± 10.0 |
|
| 28.6 ± 6.3 | 27.4 ± 7.1 | 27.9 ± 6.8 |
|
| 26.3 ± 6.3 | 37.9 ± 7.5 ‡ | 32.9 ± 9.1 |
|
| 6.16 ± 0.88 | 5.72 ± 0.79 ‡ | 5.92 ± 0.85 |
|
| 0.66 ± 0.20 | 0.64 ± 0.20 | 0.65 ± 0.20 |
|
| 96.3 ± 20.2 | 94.7 ± 18.8 | 95.4 ± 19.4 |
|
| 97.5 ± 63.0 | 86.6 ± 46.6 | 91.32 ± 54.5 |
|
| 104.9 ± 30.1 | 112.7 ± 30.3 | 109.3 ± 30.4 |
|
| 53.4 ± 14.3 | 63.5 ± 16.7 ‡ | 59.1 ± 16.5 |
|
| 177.8 ± 37.4 | 193.8 ± 38.3 ‡ | 186.8 ± 38.7 |
|
| 119.2 ± 12.8 | 116.6 ± 15.2 | 117.7 ± 14.2 |
|
| 77.9 ± 8.3 | 73.9 ± 8.8 ‡ | 75.6 ± 8.8 |
|
| 41.3 ± 9.6 | 42.7 ± 11.4 | 42.1 ± 10.7 |
|
| 91.6 ± 0.89 | 88.1 ± 0.87 † | 89.7 ± 0.64 |
|
|
| ||
|
| 47 | ||
|
| 22 | ||
|
| 11 | ||
|
| 8 | ||
|
| 4 | ||
|
| 28 | ||
|
| 8 | ||
|
| 2 | ||
|
| 26 | ||
|
| 7 | ||
|
| 5 | ||
|
| 0 | ||
|
| 3 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 17 | ||
|
| 15 | ||
|
| 1 | ||
|
| 1 |
Characteristics of the total sample of men and women, expressed as X ± SD. Abbreviations: BP, participants taking blood pressure medication; BMI, body mass index; CCAD, common carotid artery diameter in systole; Chol, participants taking cholesterol-lowering medications; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IMT, carotid intima–media thickness in systole; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; MBP, mean blood pressure; PP, pulse pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure; TC, total cholesterol; plasma TG, triglycerides. †, p < 0.01; ‡, p < 0.001 versus men.
Figure 1Measured CCAD (mm) and IMT (mm) in men and women versus height (cm). The CCAD correlation is significant at p < 0.001, while the IMT correlation is non-significant (p = 0.41).
Right common carotid artery diameter (CCAD) and intima–media thickness (IMT) multiple regression models (n = 156).
| Model 1: CCAD | Model 2: IMT | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| −0.62 | −4.25 to 3.00 | 1.84 | −0.29 | −1.09 to 0.51 | 0.41 |
|
| 0.035 ‡ | 0.017 to 0.053 | 0.009 | 0.003 | −0.001 to 0.007 | 0.002 |
|
| 0.047 † | 0.014 to 0.080 | 0.017 | 0.004 | −0.003 to 0.011 | 0.004 |
|
| 0.007 | −0.003 to 0.016 | 0.005 | 0.004 ‡ | 0.002 to 0.006 | 0.001 |
|
| 0.172 | −0.40 to 0.74 | 0.289 | -0.041 | −0.167 to 0.086 | 0.064 |
|
| 0.009 | −0.020 to 0.039 | 0.015 | 0.0002 | −0.006 to 0.007 | 0.003 |
|
| −0.004 | −0.022 to 0.014 | 0.009 | 0.002 | −0.002 to 0.006 | 0.002 |
|
| 0.001 | −0.002 to 0.004 | 0.001 | 0.00008 | −0.0005 to 0.0006 | 0.0003 |
|
| −0.005 | −0.010 to 0.0001 | 0.003 | 0.0003 | −0.001 to 0.001 | 0.0006 |
|
| 0.005 | −0.004 to 0.013 | 0.004 | −0.0003 | −0.002 to 0.002 | 0.001 |
|
| −0.002 | −0.016 to 0.011 | 0.007 | 0.0003 | −0.003 to 0.003 | 0.002 |
|
| −0.008 | −0.029 to 0.013 | 0.011 | −0.002 | −0.007 to 0.003 | 0.002 |
|
| 0.27 ‡ | 0.77 | 0.13 ‡ | 0.17 | ||
†, p < 0.01; ‡, p < 0.001. BMI, body mass index; CI, 95% confidence interval; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HDL, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; IMT, carotid intima–media thickness in systole; LDL, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; PGlu, plasma glucose; SBP, systolic blood pressure; SE, standard error.
Figure 2Hypothetical cross-sections of the common carotid artery showing the estimated percentage differences in internal lumen areas and intima–media thicknesses between a short, young, normal (Nl) weight reference person and their tall, old, and obese counterparts. Calculations are based on respective CCAD and IMT prediction equations #1 and #2 in the text and Table S1.