Claudia Langenberg1, Rebecca Hardy, Diana Kuh, Michael E Wadsworth. 1. MRC National Survey of Health and Development, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Royal Free and University College London Medical School, 1-19 Torrington Place, London WC1 6BT, UK. c.langenberg@ucl.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of height, leg and trunk length on pulse pressure (PP), systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in men and women. DESIGN: Prospective, population-based, birth cohort study. SETTING: England, Scotland and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1472 men and 1563 women aged 53 years and followed since their birth in 1946. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PP, SBP and DBP at age 53 years. RESULTS: PP increased linearly with decreasing height and leg length in men and women [shortest compared with the tallest height (leg length) group, men 54.6 versus 51.0 mmHg (55.8 versus 50.7 mmHg), women 52.9 versus 48.4 mmHg (53.3 versus 48.6 mmHg); P for trend < or = 0.001 in each case]. Adjustment for adult confounding factors and childhood social class or birth weight only slightly weakened these results (P for trend < or = 0.01 in each case). SBP, but not DBP, showed similar but weaker trends in men and women, except for the association with height in men, which lost statistical significance after adjustment. Trunk length was not associated with any outcome measure in men or women. CONCLUSIONS: Short height and leg length are associated with increased PP and SBP, but not DBP, in middle-aged men and women. PP is a potential mediator between short height and leg length and increased risk of coronary heart disease. Future studies of the association between shortness and coronary heart disease should consider the role of arterial hemodynamics.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of height, leg and trunk length on pulse pressure (PP), systolic (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in men and women. DESIGN: Prospective, population-based, birth cohort study. SETTING: England, Scotland and Wales. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1472 men and 1563 women aged 53 years and followed since their birth in 1946. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: PP, SBP and DBP at age 53 years. RESULTS: PP increased linearly with decreasing height and leg length in men and women [shortest compared with the tallest height (leg length) group, men 54.6 versus 51.0 mmHg (55.8 versus 50.7 mmHg), women 52.9 versus 48.4 mmHg (53.3 versus 48.6 mmHg); P for trend < or = 0.001 in each case]. Adjustment for adult confounding factors and childhood social class or birth weight only slightly weakened these results (P for trend < or = 0.01 in each case). SBP, but not DBP, showed similar but weaker trends in men and women, except for the association with height in men, which lost statistical significance after adjustment. Trunk length was not associated with any outcome measure in men or women. CONCLUSIONS: Short height and leg length are associated with increased PP and SBP, but not DBP, in middle-aged men and women. PP is a potential mediator between short height and leg length and increased risk of coronary heart disease. Future studies of the association between shortness and coronary heart disease should consider the role of arterial hemodynamics.
Authors: C Mary Schooling; Chaoqiang Jiang; Tai Hing Lam; G Neil Thomas; Michelle Heys; Xiangqian Lao; Weisen Zhang; Peymane Adab; Kar Keung Cheng; Gabriel M Leung Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-08-29 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Michael D Miedema; Andrew B Petrone; Donna K Arnett; John A Dodson; J Jeffrey Carr; James S Pankow; Steven C Hunt; Michael A Province; Aldi Kraja; J Michael Gaziano; Luc Djousse Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Christina M Bergey; Marie Lopez; Genelle F Harrison; Etienne Patin; Jacob A Cohen; Lluís Quintana-Murci; Luis B Barreiro; George H Perry Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-11-09 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Martin Horan; Vicky Newsway; Mark D Lewis; Tammy E Easter; D Aled Rees; Arti Mahto; David S Millar; Annie M Procter; Maurice F Scanlon; Ian B Wilkinson; Ian P Hall; Amanda Wheatley; John Blakey; Philip M W Bath; John R Cockcroft; Michael Krawczak; David N Cooper Journal: Hum Genet Date: 2006-03-30 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Johan Wadén; Carol Forsblom; Lena M Thorn; Markku Saraheimo; Milla Rosengård-Bärlund; Outi Heikkilä; Kustaa Hietala; Ken Ong; Nicholas Wareham; Per-Henrik Groop Journal: Diabetes Date: 2009-06-02 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Claudia Langenberg; Diana Kuh; Michael E J Wadsworth; Eric Brunner; Rebecca Hardy Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2006-10-31 Impact factor: 9.308