Literature DB >> 31089895

Is 0.75% ropivacaine more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for IANB in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar?

K Varun Reddy1, Anendd Jadhav2, Nitin Bhola2, Apoorva Mishra2, Prachet Dakshinkar2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We aim to compare and evaluate the anesthetic efficacy and safety of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) using 0.75% ropivacaine and 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine in lower impacted third molar (LI3M) surgery. PATIENTS AND
METHOD: We designed a prospective randomized, double-blind, split-mouth study evaluating 60 systemically healthy patients with the presence of bilateral symmetrically oriented LI3M. The sides and sequence of drug administered were randomly allocated. The primary outcome variables analyzed were hemodynamic stability, profoundness of anesthesia, and duration of postoperative analgesia. Time of onset, duration of soft tissue anesthesia, patients requiring analgesics, and their quantity for five postoperative days were recorded.
RESULTS: Early onset of anesthesia was seen in Lignocaine (68.6 ± 20.4 s) compared with Ropivacaine (104.1 ± 17.7 s) with significant differences (p = 0.001). Both the anesthetic solutions were found to be equipotent in providing profound intraoperative anesthesia. No significant difference emerged in perioperative hemodynamic stability. Ropivacaine exhibited statistically significant differences in the duration of soft tissue anesthesia (p = 0.001) and postoperative analgesia (p = 0.001). Patients requiring rescue pain medication and the number of analgesics consumed were greater on first and during five postoperative days in lignocaine when compared with that of ropivacaine with significant differences p < 0.001 and p < 0.001 respectively.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that 0.75% ropivacaine is effective in providing adequate anesthesia, prolonged postoperative analgesia, and better postoperative pain control with a safer cardiovascular profile in LI3M surgery. It can be an addition to the existing list of long-acting local anesthetics used for LI3M surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analgesia; Impacted tooth; Lignocaine; Postoperative pain; Ropivacaine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31089895     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-019-00779-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  18 in total

1.  Assessment of ropivacaine as a local anesthetic for skin infiltration in skin surgery.

Authors:  D L Moffitt; D A De Berker; C T Kennedy; L E Shutt
Journal:  Dermatol Surg       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.398

2.  Interscalene brachial plexus anaesthesia with 0.5%, 0.75% or 1% ropivacaine: a double-blind comparison with 2% mepivacaine.

Authors:  A Casati; G Fanelli; G Aldegheri; M Berti; E Colnaghi; V Cedrati; G Torri
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 9.166

3.  The value of the dental impaction pain model in drug development.

Authors:  Stephen A Cooper; Paul J Desjardins
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2010

4.  Anesthetic efficacy of different ropivacaine concentrations for inferior alveolar nerve block.

Authors:  Eman El-Sharrawy; John A Yagiela
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

Review 5.  Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales.

Authors:  Amelia Williamson; Barbara Hoggart
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.036

6.  The assessment of anesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine in oral surgery.

Authors:  Nikola Buric
Journal:  N Y State Dent J       Date:  2006 Apr-May

7.  Cardiovascular response to epinephrine-containing local anesthesia in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  H Niwa; M Sugimura; Y Satoh; A Tanimoto
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2001-12

8.  Ropivacaine versus lidocaine in digital nerve blocks: a prospective study.

Authors:  Evangelos G Keramidas; Stavroula G Rodopoulou
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.730

9.  Ropivacaine for dental anesthesia: a dose-finding study.

Authors:  Malin Ernberg; Sigvard Kopp
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.895

10.  Changes in life quality following third molar surgery--the immediate postoperative period.

Authors:  C McGrath; M B Comfort; E C M Lo; Y Luo
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 1.626

View more
  9 in total

1.  A meta-analysis on the efficacy of the ropivacaine infiltration in comparison with other dental anesthetics.

Authors:  Norma Patricia Figueroa-Fernández; Ycenna Ailed Hernández-Miramontes; Ángel Josabad Alonso-Castro; Mario Alberto Isiordia-Espinoza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of efficacy of lignocaine, ropivacaine, and bupivacaine in pain control during extraction of mandibular posterior teeth.

Authors:  Jazib Nazeer; Soni Kumari; Nazia Haidry; Pranay Kulkarni; Ashesh Gautam; Preeti Gupta
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2021-07-15

3.  Local anaesthesia for surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fan Yang; Yuxuan Gao; Lan Zhang; Bo Zheng; Liu Wang; Huan Sun; Dingming Huang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-24       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marco Tulio Rossi; Murilo Navarro de Oliveira; Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal; Walbert de Andrade Vieira; Cristiano Elias Figueiredo; Cauane Blumenberg; Vinicius Lima de Almeida; Luiz Renato Paranhos; Luciana Butini Oliveira; Walter Luiz Siqueira; Rui Barbosa de Brito Júnior
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-08       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Comparison of anaesthetic efficacy of ropivacaine (0.75% & 0.5%) with 2% lignocaine with adrenaline (1:200000) in surgical extraction of bilateral mandibular 3rd molars using IANB:a prospective, randomized, single blind study.

Authors:  Kamil N Rajpari; Neelam N Andrade; Trupti Nikalje
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-02-09

6.  Comparison of the effects of articaine and bupivacaine in impacted mandibular third molar tooth surgery: a randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  Berkay Tokuç; Fatih Mehmet Coşkunses
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-11-26

7.  Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Aniket Narayan Kakade; Sanjay S Joshi; Charudatta Shridhar Naik; Bhupendra Vilas Mhatre; Arsalan Ansari
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-10-01

8.  Does dexmedetomidine combined with levobupivacaine in inferior alveolar nerve blocks among patients undergoing impacted third molar surgery control postoperative morbidity?

Authors:  Shweta Murlidhar Patil; Anendd Jadhav; Nitin Bhola; Pawan Hingnikar; Krutarth Kshirsagar; Dipali Patil
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-03-25

9.  The Effectiveness and Safety of Ropivacaine and Medium-Dose Dexmedetomidine in Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Bin-Bin Huang; Shi-Kun Niu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 2.650

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.