Literature DB >> 17519714

Ropivacaine versus lidocaine in digital nerve blocks: a prospective study.

Evangelos G Keramidas1, Stavroula G Rodopoulou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine is a relatively new long-acting amide local anesthetic. Since its introduction in 1996, it has been used for subcutaneous infiltration; epidural, intrathecal, and peripheral nerve block surgery; and postoperative analgesia. However, it has never been used for digital blocks. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compares the digital block results following the administration of 2.5 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine solution and 2.5 ml of 2% lidocaine solution.
METHODS: From March of 1999 to March of 2001, 70 adult patients who underwent immediate reconstruction for traumatic injuries of the digits were prospectively randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 35) received 2.5 ml 0.75% ropivacaine and group B (n = 35) received 2.5 ml of 2% lidocaine for digital anesthesia. Onset time of anesthetic action, duration of anesthesia, time until first postoperative requirement for pain medication, and digital-brachial artery systolic blood pressure index were recorded and evaluated. Local vascular effects were observed visually.
RESULTS: No side effects were observed. Lidocaine had the quickest onset of anesthesia, with a mean time of 1.3 minutes (range, 1 to 2.7 minutes). Ropivacaine had a mean onset time of 4.5 minutes (range, 3.5 to 5.5 minutes). The mean duration of postoperative anesthesia for lidocaine was 2.4 hours (range, 1.4 to 4 hours), compared with 21.5 hours for ropivacaine and less requirement for analgesics during the first 24 postoperative hours (p < 0.05) (range, 19 to 23 hours). No significant difference was found between the digital-brachial artery systolic blood pressure index of group A compared with group B.
CONCLUSIONS: Ropivacaine can be used effectively as a local anesthetic for digital nerve blocks. It can be used for prolonged operations (>1.5 hours) without additional injections and can provide long-lasting postoperative analgesia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17519714     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000260725.33655.88

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  9 in total

1.  Upper-Extremity Nerve Decompression Under Local Anesthesia: A Systematic Review of Methods for Reduction of Postoperative Pain and Opioid Consumption.

Authors:  Yehuda Chocron; Albaraa Aljerian; Stephanie Thibaudeau
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-04-15

2.  Digital nerve blocks: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tiffany Y Borbón; Pingping Qu; T Tausala Coleman-Satterfield; Ryan Kearney; Eileen J Klein
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2022-07-01

3.  Is 0.75% ropivacaine more efficacious than 2% lignocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine for IANB in surgical extraction of impacted lower third molar?

Authors:  K Varun Reddy; Anendd Jadhav; Nitin Bhola; Apoorva Mishra; Prachet Dakshinkar
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-05-14

4.  A Proposed Classification and Treatment Algorithm for Rectus Diastasis: A Prospective Study.

Authors:  Evangelos Keramidas; Stavroula Rodopoulou; Maria-Ioanna Gavala
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.326

5.  Clinical efficacy of 0.75% ropivacaine vs. 2% lignocaine hydrochloride with adrenaline (1:80,000) in patients undergoing removal of bilateral maxillary third molars: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Aniket Narayan Kakade; Sanjay S Joshi; Charudatta Shridhar Naik; Bhupendra Vilas Mhatre; Arsalan Ansari
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2021-10-01

6.  Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Nerve Block with Short-Acting Lidocaine in the Surgical Treatment of Ingrown Toenails.

Authors:  Beom Suk Kim; Kyungho Kim; Jonathan Day; Jesse Seilern Und Aspang; Jaeyoung Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-11       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  The Onset and Duration of Action of 0.2% Lidocaine in a One-per-Mil Tumescent Solution for Hand Surgery.

Authors:  Theddeus O H Prasetyono; Puri A Lestari
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-05-18

8.  Comparative evaluation of hemodynamic, vasoconstrictive, and SpO2 variability during different stages of periodontal surgery performed using 0.5% ropivacaine or 2% lignocaine HCl (1:80,000 adrenaline) local anesthesia: A randomized, double-blind, split-mouth pilot study.

Authors:  Ashank Mishra; Zohra Lalani; Butchibabu Kalakonda; Preeti Krishnan; Ruchi Pandey; Krishnajaneya Reddy
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2018 May-Jun

Review 9.  Continuous Wound Infiltration of Local Anesthetics in Postoperative Pain Management: Safety, Efficacy and Current Perspectives.

Authors:  Giuseppe Paladini; Stefano Di Carlo; Giuseppe Musella; Emiliano Petrucci; Paolo Scimia; Andrea Ambrosoli; Vincenza Cofini; Pierfrancesco Fusco
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 3.133

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.